The effect of lipotropic agents on the nutritional induction of fatty liver syndrome in broilers
- 30 Downloads
One of the major metabolic disorders in poultry industry is the incidence of fatty deposits in the hepatic tissue. The high-energy diets are accompanied with fatty liver and damaging effect on the hepatic tissue. This study hypothesized that the application of lipotropic agents may help broiler chicks to efficiently utilize the high-energy diets. A total of 100-day-old broiler chicks were randomly divided into five equal groups; negative control, positive control (fed on high-energy diet), and three groups fed on high-energy diet with supplemental lipotropic agents (100 mg/kg b.wt. carnitine as l-carnitine or 1000 mg/kg b.wt. choline as choline chloride or combination of both). Average body weight (BW) and daily weight gain (BWG) were recorded during the 42-day experimental period. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, beside the serum level of total protein, albumin, globulin and A/G ratio, lipogram, and histopathological examination were carried out. The BW and BWG were decreased with an increase in ALT and ALP activity in the positive control group. Proteinogram was not affected; meanwhile, a significant increase in triglyceride (TG) was observed. Dietary supplementation of these lipotropic agents (carnitine and choline) improved all these parameters. Choline and carnitine co-treatment showed better effect than each one individually. Our histopathological examination confirms the results. Interestingly, the modulation of lipotropic agents for co-administration considers a new mechanism with a pathway key to overcome on hepatic fat accumulation.
KeywordsBroilers Choline Carnitine Fatty liver
- AVIAGEN R (2014) Ross Broiler Management Manual, 2009. http://pt.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Cen ter/Ross_Broiler/Ross_Broiler_Manual_ 9:350–364.
- Bancroft JD, Floyd AD, Suvarna SK (2013) Bancroft\’s theory and practice of histological techniquesGoogle Scholar
- Bremer J (1997) The role of carnitine in cell metabolism. In: Carnitine today. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–37Google Scholar
- Caballero F, Fernandez A, Matias N, Martinez L, Fucho R, Elena M, Caballeria J, Morales A, Fernandez-Checa JC, Garcia-Ruiz C (2010) Specific contribution of methionine and choline in nutritional nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: impact on mitochondrial S-adenosyl-L-methionine and glutathione. J Biol Chem 285:18528–18536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hossininezhad MM, Irani M, Seidavi A (2011) Dietary effects of L-carnitine supplement on performance and blood parameters of broiler chickens. J Food Agric Environ 9:475–481Google Scholar
- Kaplan A et al. (1984) Triglycerides. Clin. Chem. The C.V. Mosby St. Louis Toronto Priceton. 1194–1206Google Scholar
- Khoshkhoo PH, Azad GA, Ila N, Moayer F, and Nayeri HD (2006) Effect of dietary L-carnitine supplementation on overall performance, carcass traits, serum components and immune response in broiler chicken. In: EPC 2006-12th European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy, 10–14 September, 2006. World’s Poult Sci Association (WPSA)Google Scholar
- Krohn RI (2005) The colorimetric detection and quantitation of total protein. Current protocols in toxicology/editorial board, Mahin D. Maines Appendix 3:A 3I 1–28Google Scholar
- Lukicheva TI, Pivovarova S, Doroguntseva (1987) II [Determination of serum albumin by a colorimetric micromethod using bromcresol purple]. Laboratornoe delo 3–6Google Scholar
- Tamhane AC, Dunlop DD (2000) Statistic and data analysis from elementary to intermediate. Upper Saddle River, USAGoogle Scholar
- Veenema K, Solis C, Li R, Wang W, Maletz CV, Abratte CM, Caudill MA (2008) Adequate intake levels of choline are sufficient for preventing elevations in serum markers of liver dysfunction in Mexican American men but are not optimal for minimizing plasma total homocysteine increases after a methionine load. Am J Clin Nutr 88:685–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Whitehead CC (1979) Nutritional and metabolic aspects of fatty liver disease in poultry. Tijdschrift diergeneeskunde 104(suppl):150–157Google Scholar