Advertisement

Comparative Clinical Pathology

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1057–1060 | Cite as

Evaluation of the effect of static magnetic field in treatment of tendon injuries in dog

  • Ali AliabadiEmail author
  • Seifollah N. Dehghani
  • Maryam Farahmand
  • Sara Varzandian
  • Aboozar Dehghan
Original Article
  • 124 Downloads

Abstract

To assess the effect of magnetic field in experimental tendon injuries, ten clinically healthy adult indigenous dogs were divided into two equal groups (control and experimental). The left superficial digital flexor tendon was exposed and three windows of 6 mm thickness, 3 mm length, and 2 mm intervals were made under general anesthesia. In the experimental group, the dogs were subjected to a magnetic field of 6 × 800 G for 30 days. The tendon biopsy was collected from the site of operation on the postoperative day 30. Histomorphological changes indicated low rate of inflammatory cells, high rate of mature fibroblast, and increased normal collagen fibers, and these were better in the experimental group. The biomechanical test revealed that the tendons of the dogs in the experimental group were more resistant than tendons of the dogs in the control group. The result of this study indicated that magnetic field therapy reduced edema and local swelling, enhanced proliferation of fibroblasts, and regulated arrangement of collagen fibers, providing a good noninvasive physical therapy for tendinous injuries.

Keywords

Tendon healing Dog Magnetic field 

References

  1. Aaron RK, Ciombor DM (1993) Therapeutic effects of electromagnetic fields in stimulation of connective tissue repair. J Cell Biochem 52(1):42–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agren MS, Engle MA, Mertz PM (1994) Collagenase during burn wound healing: influence of a hydrogel dressing and pulsed electrical stimulation. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:518–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson DE, Jean G (1996) Diagnosis and management of tendon disorders in cattle. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 12:85–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassett CA (1993) Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Biochem 51(4):387–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bassett CA, Becker RO (1962) Generation of electric potentials by bone in response to mechanical stress. Science 137:1063–1064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bassett CA, Chokshi HR, Hernandez E et al (1979) The effect of pulsing electromagnetic fields on cellular calcium and calcification of nonunions. In: Brighton CT, Black J, Pollack SR (eds) Electrical properties of bone and cartilage: experimental effects and clinical applications. Grune & Stratton, New York, pp 427–441Google Scholar
  7. Farndale RW, Murray JC (1985) Pulsed electromagnetic fields promote collagen production in bone marrow fibroblasts via athermal mechanisms. Calcif Tissue Int 37:178–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fredericks DC, Nepola JV, Baker JT, Abbott J, Simon B (2000) Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone healing in a rabbit tibial osteotomy model. J Orthop Trauma 14:93–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gmitrov J, Ohkubo C, Okano H (2002) Effect of 0.25 T static magnetic field on microcirculation in rabbits. Bioelectromagnetics 23:224–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenough CG (1996) The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on flexor tendon healing in the rabbit. J Hand Surg 21A:808–812Google Scholar
  11. Inoue N, Ohnishi I, Chen D, Deitz LW, Schwardt JD, Chao EY (2002) Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) on late-phase osteotomy gap healing in a canine tibial model. J Orthop Res 20:1106–1114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. James R, Kesturu G, Gary Balian A, Chhabra B (2008) Tendon: biology, biomechanics, repair, growth factors, and evolving treatment options. JHS 33:103–112Google Scholar
  13. Kumar NA, Sharma A, Sharma K, Kumar S (2002) Carbon fibres and plasma-preserved tendon allografts for gap repair of flexor tendon in bovines: gross, microscopic and scanning electron microscopic observations. J Vet Med A 49:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Linovitz RJ, Pathria M, Bernhardt M et al (2002) Combined magnetic fields accelerate and increase spine fusion: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study. Spine 27:1383–1389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Macias MY, Battocletti JH, Sutton CH, Pintar FA, Maiman DJ (2000) Directed and enhanced neurite growth with pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. Bioelectromagnetics 21(4):272–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mayrovitz HN, Groseclose EE (2005) Effects of static magnetic field of either polarity on skin microcirculation. Microvasc Res 69:24–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Norton LA (1985) Pulsed electromagnetic field effects on chondroblast culture. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 19:70–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Norton LA, Rovetti LA (1988) Calcium incorporation in cultured chondroblasts perturbed by electromagnetic field. J Orthop Res 6:559–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ramey DW, Kirschvink JL (1998) Effect of therapeutic magnetic warps on circulation in the third metacarpal region. AAEP Proc 44:272–274Google Scholar
  20. Robotti E, Zimbler AG, Kenna D, Grossman JA (1999) The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on flexor tendon healing in chickens. J Hand Surg [Br] 24(1):56–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ryaby JT (1998) Clinical effects of electromanetic and electric fields on fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355(Suppl):S205–S215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saini NS, Roy NS, Bansal NS, Singh B, Simran PS (2002) A preliminary study on the effect of ultrasound therapy on the healing of surgically severed Achilles tendons in five dogs. J Vet Med A 49:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seiler JG III (2001) Flexor tendon repair. J Am Soc Surg Hand 1(3):177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharrard WJ (1990) A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 72B:347–355Google Scholar
  25. Steyn PE, Ramey DW, Kirschrink J, Uhring J (2000) Effect of a static magnetic field on blood flow to the metacarpus in horses. J Am-Vet-Med Assoc 217:874–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strauch B, Patel MK, Navarro JA, Berdichevsky M, Yu HL, Pilla AA (2007) Pulsed magnetic fields accelerate cutaneous wound healing in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:425–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tepper OM, Callaghan MJ, Chang EI et al (2004) Electromagnetic fields increase in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis through endothelial release of FGF-2. FASEB J 18:1231–1233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Verma PRP, Khan AA, Dass LL, Eshan Md, Jha GJ (1983) Autogenous facial tendon grafting in buffalo calves: an experimental study. Indian Vet Med J 7:23–27Google Scholar
  29. Yen-Patton GP, Patton WF, Beer DM, Jacobson BS (1988) Endothelial cell response to pulsed electromagnetic fields: stimulation of growth rate and angiogenesis in vitro. J Cell Physiol 134:37–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Aliabadi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Seifollah N. Dehghani
    • 2
  • Maryam Farahmand
    • 3
  • Sara Varzandian
    • 1
  • Aboozar Dehghan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary MedicineKazeroon Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityKazeroonIran
  2. 2.Department of Veterinary Surgery, School of Veterinary MedicineShiraz UniversityShirazIran
  3. 3.Department of Biology, School of Basic SciencesKazeroon Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityKazeroonIran

Personalised recommendations