Advertisement

Comparative Clinical Pathology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 47–57 | Cite as

Interrelationship among blood constituents, renal histopathology and ultrasonography in unilateral ureteral ligation of dogs

  • M. A. H. Abd El-Hakiem
  • Mahmoud R. Abd EllahEmail author
  • H A. Youssef
  • A. S. Saleh
  • Khaled M. A. Hassanein
Original Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of unilateral ureteral ligation on blood constituents, renal histopathology and ultrasonography in dogs. A total number of 25 apparently healthy adult mongrel dogs found Assiut City, Egypt, were subjected to study. Animals were divided into five equal groups: the left ureter was ligated for 2, 7, 14 and 21 days in groups, I, II, III and IV, respectively, while group V represented the control group. The animals in groups I, II, III and IV were euthanized on days 2, 7, 14 and 21, respectively. Right and left uretronephrectomies were performed and specimens were taken for the histopathological examination. Results revealed significant increases in total leucocytes and neutrophils counts from day 2 to day 17. There were significant decreases (p < 0.01) in total red blood cell (RBC) count and packed cell volume (PCV)% at day 14. Creatinine level was significantly increased on days 7 and 17. Histopathological changes were varied from glomerular swelling and congestion to glomerular atrophy. In conclusion, serum creatinine was highest on days 3 and 7, while creatinine clearance was lowest at day 7. The serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was the highest at day 21. Major histopathological changes were observed on day 21. These changes were compatible with the ultrasonographic and biochemical findings.

Keywords

Dog Haematology Histopathology Serum Ureter Ligation 

References

  1. Abuelo JG (2007) Normotensive ischemic acute renal failure. N Engl J Med 357:797–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman N (1983) Radiology of urogenital diseases in dogs and cats, Vol. 82. Venture Press, Davis CA, p 9Google Scholar
  3. Alpers CE (2010) The kidney. In: Robbins and Cotran. Pathologic basis of disease, 8th ed. International Edition. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, an Imprint of Elsevier Inc., pp. 905–971Google Scholar
  4. Bancroft TD, Stevens A, Turner DR (1996) Theory and practice of histological technique, 4th edn. Churchill, Livingston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun JP, Lefebvre HP, Watson ADJ (2003) Creatinine in the dog: a review. Am Soc Vet Clin Pathol 32:162–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burk RL, Feeney DA (2003) The abdomen. In: Burk RL, Feeney DA (eds) Small animal radiography and ultrasonography. A diagnostic atlas and text. Elsevier (USA), Saunders, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  7. Cartee RE, Selcer BA, Patton CS (1980) Ultrasonographic diagnosis of renal disease in small animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 176:426–430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coles EH (1986) Veterinary clinical pathology, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  9. Felkai C, Voros K, Fenyves B (1995) Lesions of the renal pelvis and proximal ureter in various nephro-urological conditions and ultrasonographic study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 36:397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finco DR (1995) Obstructive uropathy and hydronephrosis. In: Osborne CA, Finco DA (eds) Canine and feline nephrology and urology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp 889–894Google Scholar
  11. Fink RL, Caridis DT, Chmiel R, Ryan G (1980) Renal impairment and its reversibility following variable periods of complete ureteric obstruction. Aust NZ J Surg 50:77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gönenci R, Durgut R, Erdogan S, Altug MN, Bal R (2003) EvaIuation of kidney abnormalities in mongrel dogs using clinical, ultrasonographical and biochemical examinations. Ankara Üniv Yet Fak Derg 50:97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guyton C, Hall E (1998) Textbook of medical physiology, 10th edn. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 246–379Google Scholar
  14. Harris KP, Klahr S, Schreiner G (1993) Obstructive nephropathy: from mechanical disturbance to immune activation? Exp. Nephrol 1:198–204Google Scholar
  15. Jones TC, Hunt RD, King NW (1997) Veterinary pathology, 6th edn. Lippincott, Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, pp 467–469Google Scholar
  16. Moody TE, Vaughan ED, Gillenwater JY (1977) Comparison of the renal hemodynamic response to unilateral and bilateral ureteral occlusion. Invest Urol 14:455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nyland TG, Matoon JS, Herrgesell EJ (2002) Urinary tract. In: Nyland TG, Matoon JS (eds) Small animal diagnostic ultrasound, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, pp 158–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sahal M, Haziroğlu R, Özkanlar Y, Beyaz L (2005) Bilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureter in a German shepherd dog. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg 52:193–196Google Scholar
  19. Tucci S, Facincani I, Beduschi MC, Franco PB, Martins AC (1997) Cutaneous vesicostomy in children. J Pediatr 73:265–268Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. H. Abd El-Hakiem
    • 1
  • Mahmoud R. Abd Ellah
    • 2
    Email author
  • H A. Youssef
    • 1
  • A. S. Saleh
    • 1
  • Khaled M. A. Hassanein
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt
  3. 3.Department of Pathology and Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineAssiut UniversityAssiutEgypt

Personalised recommendations