, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 41–54 | Cite as

Spatial structuring of arbuscular mycorrhizal communities in benchmark and modified temperate eucalypt woodlands

  • Suzanne M. Prober
  • A. Bissett
  • C. Walker
  • G. Wiehl
  • S. McIntyre
  • M. Tibbett
Original Paper


Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are crucial to the functioning of the plant–soil system, but little is known about the spatial structuring of AMF communities across landscapes modified by agriculture. AMF community composition was characterized across four sites in the highly cleared south-western Australian wheatbelt that were originally dominated by forb-rich eucalypt woodlands. Environmentally induced spatial structuring in AMF composition was examined at four scales: the regional scale associated with location, the site scale associated with past management (benchmark woodlands with no agricultural management history, livestock grazing, recent revegetation), the patch scale associated with trees and canopy gaps, and the fine scale associated with the herbaceous plant species beneath which soils were sourced. Field-collected soils were cultured in trap pots; then, AMF composition was determined by identifying spores and through ITS1 sequencing. Structuring was strongest at site scales, where composition was strongly related to prior management and associated changes in soil phosphorus. The two fields were dominated by the genera Funneliformis and Paraglomus, with little convergence back to woodland composition after revegetation. The two benchmark woodlands were characterized by Ambispora gerdemannii and taxa from Gigasporaceae. Their AMF communities were strongly structured at patch scales associated with trees and gaps, in turn most strongly related to soil N. By contrast, there were few patterns at fine scales related to different herbaceous plant species, or at regional scales associated with the 175 km distance between benchmark woodlands. Important areas for future investigation are to identify the circumstances in which recolonization by woodland AMF may be limited by fungal propagule availability, reduced plant diversity and/or altered chemistry in agricultural soils.


Agricultural landscapes Ecological restoration Glomeromycota Land use Nitrogen Phosphorus Soil fungi 



We thank the Department of Parks and Wildlife WA, Tom and Lyn Cooke and Neil and Wendy Whyte for allowing us to sample their sites, Khalil Kariman for preparing fertilizer solutions and Jon Leff and Jane Speijers for advice on data analysis. This study was supported through the CSIRO Building Resilient Australian Biodiversity Assets theme and the Great Western Woodlands Supersite, part of the Australian government’s Terrestrial Ecosystems Research Network.

Supplementary material

572_2014_587_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (33 kb)
Table S1 (PDF 32 kb)
572_2014_587_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (59 kb)
Table_S2 (PDF 58.9 kb)


  1. Adams F, Reddell P, Webb MJ, Shipton WA (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizas and ectomycorrhizas on Eucalyptus grandis (Myrtaceae) trees and seedlings in native forests of tropical north-eastern Australia. Aust J Bot 54:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baoming JI, Gehring CA, Wilson GWT, Miller RM, Flores-Rentería L, Johnson NC (2013) Patterns of diversity and adaptation in Glomeromycota from three prairie grasslands. Mol Ecol 22:2573–2587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barea JM, Palensuela J, Cornejo P, Sánchez-Castro I, Navarro-Fernández C, Lopéz-García A, Estrada B, Azcón R, Ferrol N, Azcón-Aguilar C (2011) Ecological and functional roles of mycorrhizas in semi-arid ecosystems of Southeast Spain. J Arid Environ 75:1292–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett LT, Kasel S, Tibbits J (2009) Woodland trees modulate soil resources and conserve fungal diversity in fragmented landscapes. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2162–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair GJ, Chinoim N, Lefroy RB, Anderson GC, Crocker GJ (1991) A soil sulfur test for pasture and crops. Aust J Soil Res 29:619–626Google Scholar
  6. Brundrett MC (2009) Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant Soil 320:37–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brundrett MC, Ashwath N (2013) Glomeromycotan mycorrhizal fungi from tropical Australia III. Measuring diversity in natural and disturbed habitats. Plant Soil 370:419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chagnon P, Bradley RL, Maherali H, Klironomos JN (2013) A trait-based framework to understand life history of mycorrhizal fungi. Trends Plant Sci 18:484–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorrough J, McIntyre S, Scroggie MP (2011) Individual plant species responses to phosphorus and livestock grazing. Aust J Bot 59:669–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dowd S, Callaway T, Wolcott R, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Hagevoort R, Edrington T (2008) Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). BMC Microbiol 8:125PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fester T, Sawers R (2011) Progress and challenges in agricultural applications of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerdemann JW (1955) Relation of a large soil-borne spore to phycomycetous mycorrhizal infections. Mycologia 47:619–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosling P, Proctor M, Jones J, Bending G (2014) Distribution and diversity of Paraglomus spp. in tilled agricultural soils. Mycorrhiza 24:1–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green J, Bohannan BJM (2006) Spatial scaling of microbial biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 21:501–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green J, Holmes AJ, Westoby M, Oliver I, Briscoe D, Dangerfield M, Gillings M, Beattie AJ (2004) Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature 432:747–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Helgason T, Fitter AH (2010) Natural selection and the evolutionary ecology of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Phylum Glomeromycota). J Exp Bot 60:2465–2480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herrera-Peraza RA, Hamel C, Fernández F, Ferrer RL, Furrazola E (2010) Soil-strain compatibility: the key to effective use of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants? Mycorrhiza 21:183–193PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hewitt EJ, Smith TA (1975) Plant mineral nutrition. English Universities Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson NC (2009) Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. New Phytol 185:631–647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson NC, Wilson GWT, Bowker MA, Wilson JA, Miller RM (2010) Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:2093–2098PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kardol P, Wardle DA (2010) How understanding aboveground–belowground linkages can assist restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 25:670–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kariman K, Barker SJ, Finnegan PM, Tibbett M (2012) Dual mycorrhizal associations of jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) in a nurse-pot system. Aust J Bot 60:661–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kasel S, Bennett LT, Tibbits J (2008) Land use influences soil fungal community composition across central Victoria, south-eastern Australia. Soil Biol Biochem 4:1724–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klironomos J, Zobel M, Tibbett M, Stock WD, Rillig MC, Parrent JI, Moora M, Koch AM, Facelli JM, Facelli E, Dickie IA, Bever JD (2011) Forces that structure plant communities: quantifying the importance of the mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol 189:366–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kõljalg U, Nilsson RH, Abarenkov K et al (2013) Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Mol Ecol 22:5271–5277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krüger M, Stockinger H, Krüger C, Schüβler A (2009) DNA-based species level detection of Glomeromycota: one PCR primer set for all arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 183:212–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lambers H, Raven JA, Shaver GR, Smith SE (2008) Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trends Ecol Evol 23:95–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li X, Gai J, Cai X, Li X, Christie P, Zhang F, Zhang J (2014) Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with two co-occurring perennial plant species on a Tibetan altitudinal gradient. Mycorrhiza 24:95–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindenmayer D, Bennett AF, Hobbs R (2010) An overview of the ecology, management and conservation of Australia’s temperate woodlands. Ecol Manag Restor 11:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lozupone C, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8228–8235PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucero ME, Unc A, Cooke P, Dowd S, Sun S (2011) Endophyte microbiome diversity in micropropagated Atriplex canescens and Atriplex torreyi var griffithsii. PLoS One 6:e17693PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martínez-García LB, Armas C, Padilla FM, Miranda JD, Pugnaire FI (2011) Shrubs influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities in a semiarid environment. Soil Biol Biochem 43:682–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4. MjM Software Design, OregonGoogle Scholar
  35. Minchin PR (1989) DECODA user's manual. Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitchell RJ, Campbell CD, Chapman SJ, Cameron CM (2010) The ecological engineering impact of a single tree species on the soil microbial community. J Ecol 98:50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mummey DL, Rillig MC (2008) Spatial characterization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal molecular diversity at the submetre scale in a temperate grassland. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:260–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newbound M, Bennett LT, Tibbits J, Kasel S (2012) Soil chemical properties, rather than landscape context, influence woodland fungal communities along an urban–rural gradient. Aust Ecol 37:236–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nilsson RH, Bok G, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Hallenberg N (2009) A software pipeline for processing and identification of fungal ITS sequences. Source Code Biol Med 4:1PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nilsson RH, Veldre V, Hartmann M, Unterseher M, Amend A, Bergsten J, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Jumpponen A, Abarenkov K (2010) An open source software package for automated extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from fungal ITS sequences for use in high-throughput community assays and molecular ecology. Fungal Ecol 3:284–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oehl F, Laczo E, Bogenrieder A, Stahr K, Bӧsch R, van der Heijden M, Sieverding E (2010) Soil type and land use intensity determine the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Soil Biol Biochem 42:724–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Öpik M, Moora M, Liira J, Koljalg U, Zobel M, Sen R (2003) Divergent arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities colonize roots of Pulsatilla spp. in boreal Scots pine forest and grassland soils. New Phytol 160:581–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Öpik M, Moora M, Liira J, Zobel M (2006) Composition of root-colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in different ecosystems around the globe. J Ecol 94:778–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Osborne C, Zwart A, Broadhurst L, Young A, Richardson A (2011) The influence of sampling strategies and spatial variation on the detected soil bacterial communities under three different land-use types. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78:70–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P (2010) Estimating and controlling for spatial structure in the study of ecological communities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prober SM, Smith FP (2009) Enhancing biodiversity persistence in intensively-used agricultural landscapes: a synthesis of 30 years of research in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Agric Environ 132:173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prober SM, Wiehl G (2012) Relationships among soil fertility, native plant diversity and exotic plant abundance inform restoration of forb-rich eucalypt woodlands. Divers Distrib 18:795–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prober SM, Standish RJ, Wiehl G (2011) After the fence: vegetation and topsoil condition in grazed, fenced and benchmark eucalypt woodlands of fragmented agricultural landscapes. Aust J Bot 59:369–381Google Scholar
  49. Quince C, Lanzen A, Davenport RJ, Turnbaugh PJ (2011) Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinforma 12:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rayment GE, Lyons DJ (2010) Soil chemical methods: Australiasia. CSIRO, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  51. Richter BS, Stutz JC (2002) Mycorrhizal inoculation of Big Sacaton: implications for grassland restoration of abandoned agricultural fields. Restor Ecol 10:607–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rilllig MC (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizae and terrestrial ecosystem processes. Ecol Lett 7:740–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rowe HI, Brown CS, Paschke MW (2009) The influence of soil inoculum and nitrogen availability on restoration of high elevation steppe communities invaded by Bromus tectorum. Restor Ecol 17:686–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Santos JC, Finlay RD, Tehler A (2006) Molecular analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising a semi-natural grassland along a fertilisation gradient. New Phytol 172:159–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL (2011) Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PloS ONE 6:e27310Google Scholar
  56. Schüβler A, Krüger M, Walker C (2011) Revealing natural relationships among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: culture line BEG47 represents Diversispora epigaea, not Glomus versiforme. PLoS ONE 6(8):1–12 (e23333). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023333
  57. Searle PL (1984) The Berthelot or indophenol reaction and its use in the analytical chemistry of nitrogen. Analyst 109:549–568Google Scholar
  58. Sikes BA, Maherali H, Klironomos JN (2013) Mycorrhizal fungal growth responds to soil characteristics but not host plant identity, during a primary lacustrine dune succession. Mycorrhiza. doi: 10.1007/s00572-013-0531-x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Smallbone L, Prober SM, Lunt ID (2007) Restoration treatments enhance early establishment of native forbs in a degraded grassy woodland. Aust J Bot 55:818–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tibbett M, Ryan MH, Barker SJ, Chen Y, Denton M, Edmonds-Tibbett, Walker C (2008) The diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizas of selected Australian Fabaceae. Plant Biosyst 142:420–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Veresoglou SD, Chen B, Rillig MC (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhiza and soil nitrogen cycling. Soil Biol Biochem 46:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wakelin S, Mandera C, Gerards E, Jansab J, Erbb A, Younga S, Condronc L, O’Callaghan M (2012) Response of soil microbial communities to contrasted histories of phosphorus fertilisation in pastures. Appl Soil Ecol 61:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Willis A, Rodrigues BF, Harris PJC (2013) The ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crit Rev Plant Sci 32:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzanne M. Prober
    • 1
  • A. Bissett
    • 2
  • C. Walker
    • 3
    • 4
  • G. Wiehl
    • 1
  • S. McIntyre
    • 5
  • M. Tibbett
    • 3
    • 6
  1. 1.CSIRO Ecosystem SciencesPerthAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Plant IndustryCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.School of Earth Sciences and EnvironmentUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  4. 4.Royal Botanic Garden EdinburghEdinburghUK
  5. 5.CSIRO Ecosystem SciencesCanberraAustralia
  6. 6.Department of Environmental Science and TechnologyCranfield UniversityCranfieldUK

Personalised recommendations