Mycorrhiza

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 175–183 | Cite as

Small-scale spatial heterogeneity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal abundance and community composition in a wetland plant community

  • Benjamin E. Wolfe
  • Daniel L. Mummey
  • Matthias C. Rillig
  • John N. Klironomos
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Although it has become increasingly clear that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) play important roles in population, community, and ecosystem ecology, there is limited information on the spatial structure of the community composition of AMF in the field. We assessed small-scale spatial variation in the abundance and molecular diversity of AMF in a calcareous fen, where strong underlying environmental gradients such as depth to water table may influence AMF. Throughout an intensively sampled 2 × 2 m plot, we assessed AMF inoculum potential at a depth of 0–6 and 6–12 cm and molecular diversity of the AMF community using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism of 18S rDNA. Inoculum potential was only significantly spatially autocorrelated at a depth of 6–12 cm and was significantly positively correlated with depth to water table at both depths. Molecular diversity of the AMF community was highly variable within the plot, ranging from 2–14 terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) per core, but the number of T-RFs did not relate to water table or plant species richness. Plant community composition was spatially autocorrelated at small scales, but AMF community composition showed no significant spatial autocorrelation. Saturated soils of calcareous fens contain many infective AMF propagules and the abundance and diversity of AMF inoculum is patchy over small spatial scales.

Keywords

Spatial heterogeneity Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Wetland Calcareous fen T-RFLP 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Hafiz Maherali, Doug Larson, and Peter Weishampel provided useful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. This work was funded by the US National Science Foundation and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Bedford BL, Godwin KS (2003) Fens of the United States: distribution, characteristics, and scientific connection versus legal isolation. Wetlands 23:608–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boerner REJ, DeMars BG, Leicht PN (1996) Spatial patterns of mycorrhizal infectiveness of soils along a successional chronosequence. Mycorrhiza 6:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brundrett MC, Abbott LK (1995) Mycorrhizal fungus propagules in the jarrah forest. 2. Spatial variability in inoculum levels. New Phytol 131:461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brundrett MC, Piche Y, Peterson RL (1984) A new method for observing the morphology of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae. Can J Bot 62:2128–2134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrows RL, Pfleger FL (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi respond to increasing plant diversity. Can J Bot 80:120–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantelmo AJ, Ehrenfeld JG (1999) Effects of microtopography on mycorrhizal infection in Atlantic white cedar (Chamaecyparis thyoides (L.) Mills.). Mycorrhiza 8:175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carvalho LM, Cacador I, Martins-Loucao MA (2001) Temporal and spatial variation of arbuscular mycorrhizas in salt marsh plants of the Tagus estuary (Portugal). Mycorrhiza 11:303–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvalho LM, Correia PM, Ryel RJ, Martins-Loucao MA (2003) Spatial variability of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spores in two natural plant communities. Plant Soil 251:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carvalho LM, Correia PM, Martins-Loucao MA (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal propagules in a salt marsh. Mycorrhiza 14:165–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clapp JP, Helgason T, Daniell TJ, Young JPW (2002) Genetic studies of the structure and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. In: van der Heijden MGA, Sanders IR (eds) Mycorrhizal ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 201–221Google Scholar
  11. Clifford P, Richardson S, Hemon D (1989) Assessing the significance of the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 45:123–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Colmer TD (2003) Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant Cell Environ 26:17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornwell WK, Bedford BL, Chapin CT (2001) Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a phosphorus-poor wetland and mycorrhizal response to phosphorus fertilization. Am J Bot 88:1824–1829CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Douhan GW, Peterson C, Bledsoe C, Rizzo DM (2005) Contrasting root associated fungi of three common oak-woodland plant species based on molecular identification: host specificity or non-specific amplification? Mycorrhiza 15:365–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunbar J, Ticknor LO, Kuske CR (2001) Phylogenetic specificity and reproducibility and new method for analysis of terminal restriction fragment profiles of 16S rRNA genes from bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:190–197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunham RM, Ray AM, Inouye RS (2003) Growth, physiology, and chemistry of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Typha latifolia seedlings. Wetlands 23:890–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ettema CH, Wardle DA (2002) Spatial soil ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 17:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fortin MJ, Dale MRT (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Gange AC, Brown VK, Aplin DM (2005) Ecological specificity of arbuscular mycorrhizae: evidence from foliar- and seed-feeding insects. Ecology 86:603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Godwin KS, Shallenberger JP, Leopold DJ, Bedford BL (2002) Linking landscape properties to local hydrogeologic gradients and plant species occurrence in minerotrophic fens of New York State, USA: a hydrogeologic setting (HGS) framework. Wetlands 22:722–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hart M, Klironomos JN (2002) Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ecosystem functioning. In: van der Heijden MGA, Sanders IR (eds) Mycorrhizal ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 225–239Google Scholar
  22. Helgason T, Fitter AH, Young JPW (1999) Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising Hyacinthoides non-scripta (bluebell) in a seminatural woodland. Mol Ecol 8:659–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horner-Devine MC, Lage M, Hughes JB, Bohannan BJM (2004) A taxa–area relationship for bacteria. Nature 432:750–753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson NC, O’Dell T, Bledsoe C (1999) Methods for ecological studies of mycorrhizae. In: Robertson GP, Bledsoe C, Coleman DC, Sollins P (eds) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 378–412Google Scholar
  25. Johnson D, Vandenkoornhuyse PJ, Leake JR, Gilbert L, Booth RE, Grime JP, Young JPW, Read DJ (2004) Plant communities affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and community composition in grassland microcosms. New Phytol 161:503–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keddy P (2000) Wetland ecology: principles and conservation. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Koide RT, Dickie IA (2002) Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on plant populations. Plant Soil 244:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA (1990) A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 115:495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller SP (2000) Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of semi-aquatic grasses along a wide hydrologic gradient. New Phytol 145:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller SP, Bever JD (1999) Distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in stands of the wetland grass Panicum hemitomon along a wide hydrologic gradient. Oecologia 119:586–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller SP, Sharitz RR (2000) Manipulation of flooding and arbuscular mycorrhiza formation influences growth and nutrition of two semiaquatic grass species. Funct Ecol 14:738–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Mummey DL, Rillig MC, Holben WE (2005) Neighboring plant influences on AMF community composition: a potential mechanism for invasive plant success. Plant Soil 271:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Opik M, Moora M, Liira J, Koljalg U, Zobel M, Sen R (2003) Divergent arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities colonize roots of Pulsatilla spp. in boreal Scots pine forest and grassland soils. New Phytol 160:581–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pringle A, Bever JD (2002) Divergent phenologies may facilitate the coexistence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a North Carolina grassland. Am J Bot 89:1439–1446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rickerl DH, Sancho FO, Ananth S (1994) Vesicular–arbuscular endomycorrhizal colonization of wetland plants. J Environ Qual 23:913–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ritz K, McNicol W, Nunan N, Grayston S, Millard P, Atkinson D, Gollotte A, Habeshaw D, Boag B, Clegg CD, Griffiths BS, Wheatley RE, Glover LA, McCaig AE, Prosser JI (2004) Spatial structure in soil chemical and microbiological properties in an upland grassland. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49:191–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosendahl S, Stukenbrock EH (2004) Community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in undisturbed vegetation revealed by analyses of LSU rDNA sequences. Mol Ecol 13:3179–3186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Stevens KJ, Peterson RL (1996) The effect of a water gradient on the vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal status of Lythrum salicaria L (purple loosestrife). Mycorrhiza 6:99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stevens KJ, Spender SW, Peterson RL (2002) Phosphorus, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and performance of the wetland plant Lythrum salicaria L. under inundated conditions. Mycorrhiza 12:277–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Turner SD, Amon JP, Schneble RM, Friese CF (2000) Mycorrhizal fungi associated with plants in ground-water fed wetlands. Wetlands 20:200–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. USDA NRCS (2004) The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874–4490 USA
  43. van der Heijden MGA, Sanders IR (eds) (2002) Mycorrhizal ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR (1998) Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396:69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Ridgway KP, Watson IJ, Fitter AH, Young JPW (2003) Co-existing grass species have distinctive arbuscular mycorrhizal communities. Mol Ecol 12:3085–3095CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Weishampel PA (2005) Distribution and function of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in calcareous fen plant communities. PhD Dissertation. Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  47. Wirsel SGR (2004) Homogenous stands of a wetland grass harbour diverse consortia of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 48:129–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wolfe BE, Weishampel PA, Klironomos JN (2006) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and water table affect wetland plant community. J of Eco 94:905–914Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin E. Wolfe
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel L. Mummey
    • 3
  • Matthias C. Rillig
    • 3
  • John N. Klironomos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.Department of Organismic and Evolutionary BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Division of Biological SciencesThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations