Advertisement

Mycorrhiza

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 187–192 | Cite as

Influence of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae on uptake of arsenate by the As hyperaccumulator fern Pteris vittata L.

  • Y. Liu
  • Y. G. Zhu
  • B. D. Chen
  • P. Christie
  • X. L. Li
Original Paper

Abstract

We report for the first time some effects of colonization by an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus (Glomus mosseae) on the biomass and arsenate uptake of an As hyperaccumulator, Pteris vittata. Two arsenic levels (0 and 300 mg As kg−1) were applied to an already contaminated soil in pots with two compartments for plant and hyphal growth in a glasshouse experiment. Arsenic application had little or no effect on mycorrhizal colonization, which was about 50% of root length. Mycorrhizal colonization increased frond dry matter yield, lowered the root/frond weight ratio, and decreased frond As concentration by 33–38%. Nevertheless, transfer of As to fronds showed a 43% increase with mycorrhizal colonization at the higher soil As level. Frond As concentrations reached about 1.6 g kg−1 (dry matter basis) in non-mycorrhizal plants in the As-amended soil. Mycorrhizal colonization elevated root P concentration at both soil As levels and mycorrhizal plants had higher P/As ratios in both fronds and roots than did non-mycorrhizal controls.

Keywords

Arsenic Arbuscular mycorrhiza Arsenic hyperaccumulator As resistance Phytoremediation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Project 30370818), the National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of the Science Technology Department of the People’s Republic of China (Project 2001AA645010-4) and the Royal Society of London (Project 15360). The original seedlings were kindly supplied by Dr. Tongbin Chen of the Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

References

  1. Baker AJM, McGrath SP, Reeves RD, Smith JAC (1999) Metal hyperaccumulator plants: a review of the ecology and physiology of a biochemical resource for phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils. In: Terry N, Bañuelos GS (eds) Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water. Lewis, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 85–107Google Scholar
  2. Benson AA, Cooney RV, Herrera-Lasso LJM (1981) Arsenic metabolism in algae and higher plants. J Plant Nutr 3:285–292Google Scholar
  3. Buchet JP, Lison D (1998) Mortality by cancer in groups of the Belgian population with a moderately increased intake of arsenic. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71:125–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhankher OP, Li YJ, Rosen BP, Shi J, Salt D, Senecoff JF, Sashti NA, Meagher RB (2002) Engineering tolerance and hyperaccumulation of arsenic in plants by combining arsenate reductase and γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase expression. Nat Biotechnol 20:1140–1145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ernst WHO (2000) Evolution of metal hyperaccumulation and phytoremediation hype. New Phytol 146:357–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giovannetti M, Mosse B (1980) An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular infection in roots. New Phytol 84:489–500Google Scholar
  7. Gonzalez-Chavez C, Harris PJ, Dodd J, Meharg AA (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi confer enhanced arsenate resistance on Holcus lanatus. New Phytol 155:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gruebel KA, Davis JA, Leckie JO (1988) The feasibility of using sequential extraction techniques for arsenic and selenium in soils and sediments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:390–397Google Scholar
  9. Gucwa-Przepiora E, Turnau K (2001) Arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant succession on zinc smelter spoil heap in Katowice-Welnowiec. Acta Soc Bot Pol 70:153–158Google Scholar
  10. Johnson SE, Barnard WM (1979) Comparative effectiveness of fourteen solutions for extracting arsenic from four western New York soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:304–308Google Scholar
  11. Karim MM (2000) Arsenic in groundwater and health problems in Bangladesh. Water Res 34:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee RB (1982) Selectivity and kinetics of ion uptake by barley plants following nutrient deficiency. Ann Bot 50:429–449Google Scholar
  13. Leyval C, Turnau K, Haselwandter K (1997) Effect of heavy metal pollution on mycorrhizal colonization and function: physiological, ecological and applied aspects. Mycorrhiza 7:139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ma LQ, Komar KM, Tu C, Zhang WH, Cai Y, Kennelley ED (2001) A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic. Nature 409:579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mandal BK, Suzuki KT (2002) Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58:201–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meharg AA, Hartley-Whitaker J (2002) Arsenic uptake and metabolism in arsenic resistant and nonresistant plant species. New Phytol 154:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meharg AA, Bailey J, Breadmore K, MacNair MR (1994) Biomass allocation, phosphorus nutrition and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in clones of Yorkshire Fog, Holcus lanatus L. (Poaceae) that differ in their phosphate uptake kinetics and tolerance to arsenate. Plant Soil 160:11–20Google Scholar
  18. Rodriguez RR, Basta NT, Casteel SW, Armstrong FP, Ward DC (2003) Chemical extraction methods to assess bioavailable arsenic in soil and solid media. J Environ Qual 32:876–884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sharples JM, Meharg AA, Chambers SM, Cairney JWG (1999) Arsenate sensitivity in ericoid and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1848–1855Google Scholar
  20. Sharples JM, Meharg AA, Chambers SM, Cairney JWG (2000a) Mechanism of arsenate resistance in the ericoid mycorrhizal fungus Hymenoscyphus ericae. Plant Physiol 124:1327–1334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharples JM, Meharg AA, Chambers SM, Cairney JWG (2000b) Evolution—symbiotic solution to arsenic contamination. Nature 404:951–952Google Scholar
  22. Sidibe A, Tesarova M (2001) Effect of inoculation with endomycorrhizal fungi on the growth of selected plants. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brunensis 49:15–20Google Scholar
  23. Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Tu C, Ma LQ (2002) Effects of arsenic concentrations and forms on arsenic uptake by the hyperaccumulator ladder brake. J Environ Qual 31:641–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Turnau K (1998) Heavy metal content and localization in mycorrhizal Euphorbia cyparissias from zinc wastes in southern Poland. Acta Soc Bot Pol 67:105–113Google Scholar
  26. Valberg PA, Beck BD, Bowers TS, Keating JL, Bergstrom PD, Boardman PD (1997) Issues in setting health-based cleanup levels for arsenic in soil. Regul Toxicol Pharm 26:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang JR, Zhao FJ, Meharg AA, Raab A, Feldmann J, McGrath SP (2002) Mechanism of arsenic hyperaccumulation in Pteris vittata. Uptake kinetics, interactions with phosphate, and arsenic speciation. Plant Physiol 130:1552–1561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. White PJ (2001) Phytoremediation assisted by microorganisms. Trends Plant Sci 6:502–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhao FJ, Dunham SJ, McGrath SP (2002) Arsenic hyperaccumulation by different fern species. New Phytol 156:27–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Liu
    • 1
  • Y. G. Zhu
    • 2
  • B. D. Chen
    • 2
  • P. Christie
    • 1
    • 3
  • X. L. Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant NutritionChina Agricultural UniversityBeijing China
  2. 2.Department of Soil Environmental Science, Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijing China
  3. 3.Agricultural and Environmental Science Department Queen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations