Advertisement

Minimal microfabrication required digital microfluidic system toward point-of-care nucleic acid amplification test application for developing countries

  • Thien Hoang
  • Bao-Han Ly
  • Thanh-Xuan Le
  • Thanh-Thao Huynh
  • Hoang-Tuan Nguyen
  • Toi Van Vo
  • Thi Thu Hien Pham
  • Khon HuynhEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Digital Microfluidics (DMF) has potentially been a favorable platform for point-of-care molecular diagnostics. However, its fabrication process normally relies heavily on expensive microfabrication facilities and equipment. In this work, we developed a portable, small footprint DMF device that requires minimal microfabrication work (only a small clean bench and a DIY spin coater were required) but is still capable of performing nucleic acid amplification tests. The DMF system implemented in this work could perform successfully the Loop-mediated isothermal Amplification (LAMP) reaction with samples containing extracted DNA of Plasmodium falciparum that causes Malaria in human. The LAMP reaction was conducted at the optimal temperature of 65 °C in 45 min with the total reaction volume of 1.5 µL. The results of LAMP were designed to be observable to naked eyes via the color change from pink to yellowish orange, which simplifies the readout step and eliminates the necessity for external and bulky result-reading equipment.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the International University—Vietnam National Universities, Ho Chi Minh City under the grant number of T2018-BME-02.

References

  1. AC-DC—OpenDrop (2019). https://www.gaudi.ch/OpenDrop/?p=274. Accessed 29 Sep 2019
  2. Abdelgawad M, Wheeler AR (2007) Rapid prototyping in copper substrates for digital microfluidics. Adv Mater 19(1):133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdelgawad M, Wheeler AR (2008) Low-cost, rapid-prototyping of digital microfluidics devices. Microfluid Nanofluidics 4(4):349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alistar M, Gaudenz U (2017) OpenDrop: an integrated do-it-yourself platform for personal use of biochips. Bioengineering 4(2):45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharjee B, Najjaran H (2010) Droplet position control in digital microfluidic systems. Biomed Microdevices 12(1):115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang YH, Bin Lee G, Huang FC, Chen YY, Lin JL (2006) Integrated polymerase chain reaction chips utilizing digital microfluidics. Biomed Microdevices 8(3):215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho SK, Moon H, Kim C-J (2003) Creating, transporting, cutting, and merging liquid droplets by electrowetting-based actuation for digital microfluidic circuits. J Microelectromech Syst 12(1):70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi K, Ng AHC, Fobel R, Wheeler AR (2012) Digital microfluidics. Annu Rev Anal Chem 5(1):413–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coelho B et al (2017a) Digital microfluidics for nucleic acid amplification. Sensors 17(7):1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coelho B et al (2017b) A digital microfluidics platform for loop-mediated isothermal amplification detection. Sensors 17(11):2616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Smith N (2016) Nixie HV switching PSU. https://desmith.net/NMdS/Electronics/NixiePSU.html. Accessed 22 Jan 2018
  12. Fair R (2007) Digital microfluidics: is a true lab-on-a-chip possible? Microfluid Nanofluid 3:245–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fobel R, Fobel C, Wheeler AR (2013) DropBot: an open-source digital microfluidic control system with precise control of electrostatic driving force and instantaneous drop velocity measurement. Appl Phys Lett 102(19):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gong J, Kim C-J (2005) Two dimensional digital microfluidic system by multi-layer printed circuit board. IEEE 11:2693–2700Google Scholar
  15. Gong J, Kim C-J (2008) All-electronic droplet generation on-chip with real-time feedback control for EWOD digital microfluidics. Lab Chip 8(6):898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Supertex Inc (1995) 64-Channel serial to parallel converter with high voltage push-pull outputs. HV507 datasheet, no. DSFP-HV507Google Scholar
  17. Jebrail MJ et al (2011) A digital microfluidic method for dried blood spot analysis. Lab Chip 11(19):3218–3224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalsi S et al (2015) Rapid and sensitive detection of antibiotic resistance on a programmable digital microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 15(14):3065–3075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lau YL, Lai MY, Fong MY, Jelip J, Mahmud R (2016) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for identification of five human plasmodium species in Malaysia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 94(2):336–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lebrasseur E et al (2007) Two-dimensional electrostatic actuation of droplets using a single electrode panel and development of disposable plastic film card. Sens Actuators A Phys 136(1):358–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Y, Li H, Baker RJ (2015) A low-cost and high-resolution droplet position detector for an intelligent electrowetting on dielectric device. J Lab Autom 20(6):663–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Louie M, Louie L, Simor AE (2000) The role of DNA amplification technology in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. CMAJ 163(3):301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manuscript A, Microfluidics DTD, Printed UM, Board C (2009) NIH public access. Vital Health Stat Ser 20 Data From Natl Vitalstatist Syst 17(2):257–264Google Scholar
  24. Murran MA, Najjaran H (2012) Capacitance-based droplet position estimator for digital microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 12(11):2053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ng AHC et al (2018) A digital microfluidic system for serological immunoassays in remote settings. Sci Transl Med 6076:1–13Google Scholar
  26. Nikapitiya NYJB, Nahar MM, Moon H (2017) Accurate, consistent, and fast droplet splitting and dispensing in electrowetting on dielectric digital microfluidics. Micro Nano Syst Lett 5(1):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norian H, Field RM, Kymissis I, Shepard KL (2014) An integrated CMOS quantitative-polymerase-chain-reaction lab-on-chip for point-of-care diagnostics. Lab Chip 14(20):4076–4084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pollack MG (2001) Electrowetting-based microactuation of droplets for digital microfluidics, pp 1–159Google Scholar
  29. Pollack MG, Fair RB, Shenderov AD (2000) Electrowetting-based actuation of liquid droplets for microfluidic applications. Appl Phys Lett 77(11):1725–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shah GJ, Sadeghi S, Ding H, Chen S, Van Dam RM (2011) Impedance-based droplet volume and concentration, pp 1308–1310Google Scholar
  31. Shih SCCC, Fobel R, Kumar P, Wheeler AR (2011) A feedback control system for high-fidelity digital microfluidics. Lab Chip 11(3):535–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Srigunapalan S, Eydelnant IA, Simmons CA, Wheeler AR (2012) A digital microfluidic platform for primary cell culture and analysis. Lab Chip 12(2):369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tanner NA, Zhang Y, Evans TC (2015) Visual detection of isothermal nucleic acid amplification using pH-sensitive dyes. Biotechniques 58(2):59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wan L et al (2019) LampPort: a handheld digital microfluidic device for loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)Google Scholar
  35. Wan L et al (2017) A digital microfluidic system for loop-mediated isothermal amplification and sequence specific pathogen detection. Sci Rep 7(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. WHO | Antimicrobial resistance (2018) WHO. https://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/en/. Accessed 07 July 2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biomedical EngineeringInternational University, Vietnam National UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations