Advertisement

Optimal location and parametric settings of FACTS devices based on JAYA blended moth flame optimization for transmission loss minimization in power systems

  • Stita Pragnya DashEmail author
  • K. R. Subhashini
  • J. K. Satapathy
Technical Paper
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a novel hybrid algorithm that includes the superior properties of strong algorithms which have been developed in recent past. The study involves minimization of transmission loss in IEEE networks through the efficient placement of flexible alternating current transmission system (FACTS) devices. In this work two types of devices namely thyristor controlled series compensator (TCSC) and static VAR compensator (SVC) are used in IEEE 14 bus and IEEE 30 bus systems. The main objective of active power loss reduction is achieved through the minimization of installation cost of these devices which is considered as the fitness function for the optimization algorithms. In this paper Moth flame optimization (MFO) in its natural form as well as in hybrid form called JAYA blended MFO (JMFO) is applied for the study. The results obtained are compared with existing technique like particle swarm optimization (PSO).

Notes

References

  1. Akumalla SS, Peddakotla S, Kuppa SRA (2016) A modified cuckoo search algorithm for improving voltage profile and to diminish power losses by locating multi-type facts devices. J Control Autom Electr Syst 27(1):93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ara AL, Kazemi A, Niaki SN (2012) Multiobjective optimal location of facts shunt-series controllers for power system operation planning. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 27(2):481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benabid R, Boudour M, Abido M (2009) Optimal location and setting of svc and tcsc devices using non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimization. Electr Power Syst Res 79(12):1668–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya B, Goswami S (2012) Optimal planning for the placement of facts devices by differential evolution technique for the increased loadabilty of a power system. In: 2012 Asia-pacific power and energy engineering conference. IEEE, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharyya B, Gupta VK (2014) Fuzzy based evolutionary algorithm for reactive power optimization with facts devices. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 61:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai L, Erlich I, Stamtsis G (2004) Optimal choice and allocation of facts devices in deregulated electricity market using genetic algorithms. In: IEEE PES power systems conference and exposition. IEEE, pp 201–207Google Scholar
  7. Duan C, Fang W, Jiang L, Niu S (2015) Facts devices allocation via sparse optimization. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(2):1308–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fughar A, Nwohu M (2014) Optimal location of statcom in Nigerian 330 kv network using ant colony optimization meta-heuristic. Glob J Res EngGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerbex S, Cherkaoui R, Germond AJ (2001) Optimal location of multi-type facts devices in a power system by means of genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(3):537–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gitizadeh M, Kalantar M (2009) Genetic algorithm-based fuzzy multi-objective approach to congestion management using facts devices. Electr Eng 90(8):539–549zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hingorani NG, Gyugyi L, El-Hawary M (2000) Understanding FACTS: concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission systems, vol 1. IEEE Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Idris RM, Khairuddin A, Mustafa M (2010) Optimal allocation of facts devices in deregulated electricity market using bees algorithm. WSEAS Trans Power Syst 5(2):108–119Google Scholar
  13. Jumaat SA, Musirin I, Othman MM, Mokhlis H (2011) Transmission loss minimization using svc based on particle swarm optimization. In: 2011 IEEE symposium on industrial electronics and applications. IEEE, pp 419–424Google Scholar
  14. Jumaat SA, Musirin I, Othman MM, Mokhlis H (2012) Optimal placement and sizing of multiple facts devices installation. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on power and energy (PECon). IEEE, pp 145–150Google Scholar
  15. Mirjalili S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl Based Syst 89:228–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nguyen KP, Vo DN, Fujita G (2016) Hybrid cuckoo search algorithm for optimal placement and sizing of static var compensator. In: Handbook of research on modern optimization algorithms and applications in engineering and economics, IGI Global, pp 288–326Google Scholar
  17. Nireekshana T, Rao GK, Raju SS (2016) Available transfer capability enhancement with facts using cat swarm optimization. Ain Shams Eng J 7(1):159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parastar A, Pirayesh A, Nikoukar J (2007) Optimal location of facts devices in a power system using modified particle swarm optimization. In: 2007 42nd international universities power engineering conference. IEEE, pp 1122–1128Google Scholar
  19. Phadke A, Fozdar M, Niazi K (2012) A new multi-objective fuzzy-ga formulation for optimal placement and sizing of shunt facts controller. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 40(1):46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prasad D, Mukherjee V (2016) A novel symbiotic organisms search algorithm for optimal power flow of power system with facts devices. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19(1):79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ranganathan S, Kalavathi MS et al (2016) Self-adaptive firefly algorithm based multi-objectives for multi-type facts placement. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(11):2576–2584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rao R (2016) Jaya: a simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput 7(1):19–34Google Scholar
  23. Rashed GI, Shaheen H, Cheng S (2007) Optimal location and parameter setting of TCSC by both genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. In: 2007 2nd IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications. IEEE, pp 1141–1147Google Scholar
  24. Rashedi E, Nezamabadi-Pour H, Saryazdi S, Farsangi MM (2007) Allocation of static var compensator using gravitational search algorithm. World 1:10Google Scholar
  25. Ravi K, Rajaram M (2013) Optimal location of facts devices using improved particle swarm optimization. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 49:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saravanan M, Slochanal SMR, Venkatesh P, Abraham JPS (2007) Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of facts devices considering cost of installation and system loadability. Electr Power Syst Res 77(3–4):276–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shaheen HI, Rashed GI, Cheng S (2011) Optimal location and parameter setting of UPFC for enhancing power system security based on differential evolution algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(1):94–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharma AK (2006) Optimal number and location of tcsc and loadability enhancement in deregulated electricity markets using MINLP. Int J Emerg Electr Power Syst.  https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-779X.1117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh S, David A (2001) Optimal location of facts devices for congestion management. Electr Power Syst Res 58(2):71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Subhashini K, Chinta P (2019) An augmented animal migration optimization algorithm using worst solution elimination approach in the backdrop of differential evolution. Evolut Intell 12(2):273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sumpavakup C, Srikun I, Chusanapiputt S (2010) A solution to the optimal power flow using artificial bee colony algorithm. In: 2010 international conference on power system technology. IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  32. Sundareswaran K, Bharathram P, Siddharth M, Vaishnavi G, Shrivastava NA, Sarma H (2009) Voltage profile enhancement through optimal placement of facts devices using queen-bee-assisted GA, In: Power Systems, 2009. ICPS’09. International Conference on IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  33. Sute S, Rajderkar V (2012) Sensitivity based analysis for the optimal placement of upfc for congestion management. In: IRNet transactions on electrical and electronics engineeringGoogle Scholar
  34. Tabatabaei N, Aghajani G, Boushehri N, Shoarinejad S (2011) Optimal location of facts devices using adaptive particle swarm optimization mixed with simulated annealing. Int J Tech Phys Probl Eng (IJTPE) 7:60–70Google Scholar
  35. Taleb M, Salem A, Ayman A, Azma M (2016) Optimal allocation of TCSC using adaptive cuckoo search algorithm. In: 2016 eighteenth international Middle East power systems conference (MEPCON). IEEE, pp 387–391Google Scholar
  36. Ushasurendra S, Parathasarthy S (2012) Congestion management in deregulated power sector using fuzzy based optimal location technique for series flexible alternative current transmission system (facts) device. J Electr Electron Eng Res 4(1):12–20Google Scholar
  37. Vaidya P, Rajderkar V (2011) Optimal location of series facts devices for enhancing power system security. In: 2011 4th international conference on emerging trends in engineering & technology. IEEE, pp 185–190Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of TechnologyRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations