Advertisement

Air damping of high performance resonating micro-mirrors with angular vertical comb-drive actuators

  • Russell FarrugiaEmail author
  • Barnaby Portelli
  • Ivan Grech
  • Duncan Camilleri
  • Owen Casha
  • Joseph Micallef
  • Edward Gatt
Technical Paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The maximum scan angle amplitude of resonating micro-mirrors, intended for micro-projection display applications is limited by air damping. Three-dimensional transient Navier–Stokes (N–S) simulations are performed to analyse the fluid flow interactions with a high frequency scanning micro-mirror driven by angular vertical comb (AVC) actuators. The time-dependent damping moment contributions due to viscous shear and pressure drag are subsequently computed for both the mirror plate and comb-drive structures. A computational-efficient N–S model of the AVC structure, based on the sliding mesh technique available in ANSYS Fluent, is proposed. The effect of scan angle amplitude on the damping moment and the flow regime surrounding the oscillating micro-mirror plate is analysed in detail. It is shown that the simplified damping models applicable to resonant MEMS devices are not valid within the operating range of high performance micro-scanners. From dynamic mesh N–S simulations, the effect of the underlying mirror cavity wall on pressure drag damping is also evaluated. Good qualitative agreement in the overall quality factor is achieved between simulation and measurement results.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank ST Microelectronics (Agrate Brianza, Italy) for the provision and preparation of the sample micro-mirrors characterised as part of this research. This work was supported by the project Lab4MEMS II. Lab4MEMS II project has been launched by the European Nanoelectronics Initiative Advisory Council (ENIAC) Joint Undertaking (JU), a public–private partnership in nanoelectronics-Project ID: 621176-2 (ENIAC Call 2013-2).

References

  1. ANSYS® Academic Research (2016) Release 18.0, help system, sliding mesh theory, ANSYS Inc.Google Scholar
  2. ANSYS® Academic Research (2016) Release 18.0, help system, mechanical APDL, fluids analysis guide, chapter 5: slide film damping. ANSYS, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Bird GA (1998) Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi S, Choi H, Kang S (2002) Characteristics of flow over a rotationally oscillating cylinder at low Reynolds number. Phys Fluids 14(8):2767–2777CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Chu HC, Kim M-U (2004) Oscillatory Stokes flow due to motions of a circular disk parallel to an infinite plane wall. Fluid Dyn Res 34:77–97MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark RJ, Williams P, Jensen OE (2005) The drag on a microcantilever oscillating near a wall. J Fluid Mech 545:397–426MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis WO (2009) Empirical analysis of form drag damping for scanning micromirrors. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 7208Google Scholar
  8. Farrugia R, Grech I, Camilleri D, Casha O, Gatt E, Micallef J (2017) Theoretical and finite element analysis of dynamic deformation in resonating micromirrors. Microsyst Technol 24:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrugia R, Grech I, Camilleri D, Casha O, Micallef J, Gatt E (2018) Design optimization of a dynamically flat resonating micro-mirror for pico-projection applications. Microsyst TechnolGoogle Scholar
  10. Fornari A, Sullivan M, Chen H, Harrison C (2010) Experimental observation of inertia-dominated squeeze film. J Fluids Eng 132(12):121201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoang Manh C, Hane K (2009) Vacuum operation of comb-drive micro display mirrors. J Micromech Microeng 19(10):105018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim MU, Kim K, Cho YH, Kwak B (2001) Hydrodynamic force on a plate near the plane wall. Part II: plate in squeezing motion. Fluid Dyn Res 29:171–198CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Klose T, Sandner T, Schenk H, Lakner H (2006) Extended damping model for out-of-plane comb driven micromirrors. In: MOEMS display, imaging, and miniaturized microsystems IV, San Jose, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. Klose T, Conrad H, Sandner T, Schenk H (2008) Fluidmechanical damping analysis of resonant micromirrors with out-of-plane comb drive. In: COMSOL conference, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  15. Koay L, Ratnam M, Gitano-Briggs H (2015) An approach for nonlinear damping characterization for linear optical scanner. Exp Tech 39:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mariani MS, De Fazio M (2014) Fluid damping in compliant, comb-actuated torsional micromirrors. In: EuroSimE, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  17. Nabholz U, Heinzelmann W, Mehner J, Degenfeld-Schonburg P (2018) Amplitude- and gas pressure-dependent nonlinear damping of high-Q oscillatory MEMS micro mirrors. J Microelectromech Syst 27(3):383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Portelli B, Farrugia R, Grech I, Casha O, Micallef J, Gatt E (2017) Capacitance measurement techniques in MOEMS angular vertical comb-drive actuators. In: Symposium on design, test, integration and packaging of MEMS/MOEMS, BordeauxGoogle Scholar
  19. Sandner T, Klose T, Wolter A, Schenk H, Lakner H (2004) Damping analysis and measurement for a comb-drive scanning mirror. Proc SPIE 5455:147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sherwood JD (2013) Stokes drag on a disc with a Navier slip condition. Fluid Dyn Res 45(5):055505MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Silva G, Carpignano F, Guerinoni F, Costantini S, Fazio MD, Merlo S (2015) Optical detection of the electromechanical response of MEMS micromirrors designed for scanning picoprojectors. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 21(4):147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sorger A, Freitag M, Shaporin A, Mehner J (2012) CFD analysis of viscous losses in complex microsystems. In: 9th international multi-conference on system, signals and devices, ChemnitzGoogle Scholar
  23. Tian X, Xiao L, Zhang X, Yang J, Tao L, Yang D (2017) Flow around an oscillating circular disk at low to moderate Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech 812:1119–1145MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Urey H, Wine D, Osborn T (2000) Optical performance requirements for MEMS-scanner based microdisplays. In: MOEMS and miniaturized systems conference, Santa ClaraGoogle Scholar
  25. Veijola T, Kuisma H, Lahdenpera J, Ryhanen T (1995) Equivalent-circuit model of the squeezed gas film in a silicon accelerometer. Sens Actuators A 48:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xia C, Qiao D, Zeng Q, Yuan W (2015) The squeeze-film air damping of circular and elliptical micro-torsion mirrors. Microfluid Nanofluidics 19(3):585–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang W, Stone H (1998) Oscillatory motions of circular disks and nearly spherical particles in viscous flows. J Fluid Mech 367:329–358CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Microelectronics and Nanoelectronics, Faculty of Information and Communication TechnologyUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations