Advertisement

Multi-objective optimization design for a sand crab-inspired compliant microgripper

  • Duc Nam Nguyen
  • Nhat Linh Ho
  • Thanh-Phong DaoEmail author
  • Ngoc Le Chau
Technical Paper
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

A large working travel and a minimal stress are the most critical characteristics of a microgripper but they are conflicted each other. This paper develops a new efficient hybrid algorithm to solve the multi-objective optimization design for a sand bubbler crab-inspired compliant microgripper. The structure of sand bubbler crab-inspired compliant microgripper is inspired from the profile of sand bubbler crab. A surrogate-assisted multi-objective optimization is conducted by developing a hybrid approach of finite element analysis, response surface method, Kigring metamodel and multi-objective genetic algorithm. First, the data are collected by integrating the finite element analysis and response surface method. Subsequently, in the types of common surrogates, Kigring metamodel is adopted as an efficient tool to approximate the objective functions. And then, the Pareto-optimal fronts are found via the multi-objective genetic algorithm. The results indicated that the optimal results are at the displacement of 5999.9 µm and stress of 330.68 MPa. The results revealed that the optimized results are highly consistent with both the validation results. The accuracy of the surrogate models showed that the regression model is a good prediction. The proposed approach is useful tool to solve complex optimization designs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under Grant number 107.03-2018.11.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ai W, Xu Q (2014) New structural design of a compliant gripper based on the Scott-Russell mechanism. Int J Adv Robot Syst 11:1623–1628.  https://doi.org/10.5772/59655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSYS Workbench Software (2016) ANSYS meshing advanced techniques—PADT lunch & learn series. ANSYS Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Cao L, Dolovich AT, Chen A, Zhang W (2018) Topology optimization of efficient and strong hybrid compliant mechanisms using a mixed mesh of beams and flexure hinges with strength control. Mech Mach Theory 121:213–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang FS, Wu JS, Lee CN, Shen HC (2014) Greedy-search-based multi-objective genetic algorithm for emergency logistics scheduling. Expert Syst Appl 41:2947–2956.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chau NL, Dao TP, Nguyen VTT (2018) Optimal design of a dragonfly-inspired compliant joint for camera positioning system of nanoindentation tester based on a hybrid integration of Jaya-ANFIS. Math Probl Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8546095 Google Scholar
  6. Chen W, Qu J, Chen W, Zhang J (2017a) A compliant dual-axis gripper with integrated position and force sensing. Mechatronics 47:105–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen W, Zhang X, Li H et al (2017b) Nonlinear analysis and optimal design of a novel piezoelectric-driven compliant microgripper. Mech Mach Theory 118:32–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen S, Ling M, Zhang X (2018) Design and experiment of a millimeter-range and high-frequency compliant mechanism with two output ports. Mech Mach Theory 126:201–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dang MP, Dao TP, Chau NL, Le HG (2019) Effective hybrid algorithm of Taguchi method, FEM, RSM, and teaching learning-based optimization for multiobjective optimization design of a compliant rotary positioning stage for nanoindentation tester. Math Probl Eng 2019:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4191924 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dao TP (2016) Multiresponse optimization of a compliant guiding mechanism using hybrid Taguchi-grey based fuzzy logic approach. Math Probl Eng 2016:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5386893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dao TP, Huang SC (2016) Design and analysis of a compliant micro-positioning platform with embedded strain gauges and viscoelastic damper. Microsyst Technol 23:441–456.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-016-3048-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dao TP, Huang SC (2017a) Compliant thin-walled joint based on zygoptera nonlinear geometry. J Mech Sci Technol 31:1293–1303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-0228-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dao TP, Huang SC (2017b) Optimization of a two degrees of freedom compliant mechanism using Taguchi method-based grey relational analysis. Microsyst Technol 23L:4815–4830.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3292-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dao TP, Huang SC (2017c) Design and multi-objective optimization for a broad self-amplified 2-DOF monolithic mechanism. Sadhana Acad Proc Eng Sci 42:1527–1542.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0714-9 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Dao TP, Ho NL, Nguyen TT et al (2017a) Analysis and optimization of a micro-displacement sensor for compliant microgripper. Microsyst Technol 23:5375–5395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-017-3378-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dao TP, Huang SC, Thang PT (2017b) Hybrid Taguchi-cuckoo search algorithm for optimization of a compliant focus positioning platform. Appl Soft Comput J 57:526–538.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edin BB, Beccai L, Ascari L et al (2006) A bio-inspired approach for the design and characterization of a tactile sensory system for a cybernetic prosthetic hand. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2006, pp 1354–1358.  https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2006.1641897
  18. Hao G, Hand RB (2016) Design and static testing of a compact distributed-compliance gripper based on flexure motion. Arch Civ Mech Eng 16:708–716.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2016.04.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho NL, Dao TP (2019) Optimal design of a compliant microgripper for assemble system of cell phone vibration motor using a hybrid approach of ANFIS and Jaya. Arab J Sci Eng 44:1205–1220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3445-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho NL, Dao TP, Le Chau N, Huang SC (2018) Multi-objective optimization design of a compliant microgripper based on hybrid teaching learning-based optimization algorithm. Microsyst Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-018-4222-6 Google Scholar
  21. Huang SC, Dao TP (2016) Multi-objective optimal design of a 2-DOF flexure-based mechanism using hybrid approach of grey-Taguchi coupled response surface methodology and entropy measurement. Arab J Sci Eng 41:5215–5231.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2242-z MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang P, Wang C, Zhou Q et al (2016) Optimization of laser welding process parameters of stainless steel 316L using FEM, Kriging and NSGA-II. Adv Eng Softw 99:147–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lai LJ, Zhu ZN (2017) Design, modeling and testing of a novel flexure-based displacement amplification mechanism. Sens Actuators A Phys 266:122–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2017.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ling M, Cao J, Zeng M et al (2016) Enhanced mathematical modeling of the displacement amplification ratio for piezoelectric compliant mechanisms. Smart Mater Struct 25:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ling M, Cao J, Jiang Z, Li Q (2018a) Development of a multistage compliant mechanism with new boundary constraint. Rev Sci Instrum 89:015009-8.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5007890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ling M, Cao J, Jiang Z, Lin J (2018b) A semi-analytical modeling method for the static and dynamic analysis of complex compliant mechanism. Precis Eng 52:64–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu Y, Xu Q (2016) Mechanical design, analysis and testing of a large-range compliant microgripper. Mech Sci 7:119–126.  https://doi.org/10.5194/ms-7-119-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu S, Dai J, Li A et al (2016) Analysis of frequency characteristics and sensitivity of compliant mechanisms. Chin J Mech Eng 29:680–693.  https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2015.1215.148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu CH, Huang GF, Chiu CH, Pai TY (2017) Topology synthesis and optimal design of an adaptive compliant gripper to maximize output displacement. J Intell Robot Syst Theory Appl 90:287–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0671-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martínez-vargas A, Domínguez-guerrero J, Andrade ÁG et al (2015) Application of NSGA-II algorithm to the spectrum assignment problem in spectrum sharing networks. Appl Soft Comput J 39:188–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noh M, Kim S, An S et al (2012) Flea-inspired catapult mechanism for miniature jumping robots. IEEE Trans Robot 28:1007–1018.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2012.2198510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pajares A, Blasco X, Herrero JM, Reynoso-meza G (2018) A multiobjective genetic algorithm for the localization of optimal and nearly optimal solutions which are potentially useful: nevMOGA. Complexity 2018:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1792420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sakhaei AH, Kaijima S, Lee TL et al (2018) Design and investigation of a multi-material compliant ratchet-like mechanism. Mech Mach Theory 121:184–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sun C, Ding J, Zeng J, Jin Y (2016) A fitness approximation assisted competitive swarm optimizer for large scale expensive optimization problems. Memet Comput 10:123–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-016-0199-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Valentini PP, Pennestrì E (2018) Compliant four-bar linkage synthesis with second-order flexure hinge approximation. Mech Mach Theory 128:225–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wegst UGK, Bai H, Saiz E et al (2014) Bioinspired structural materials. Nat Mater 14:23–36.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhou M, Jiang Z (2016) A multi-objective memetic algorithm based on decomposition for big optimization problems. Memet Comput 8:45–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-015-0175-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou X, Xu H, Cheng J et al (2015) Flexure-based roll-to-roll platform: a practical solution for realizing large-area microcontact printing. Sci Rep 5:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10402 Google Scholar
  39. Zhu WL, Zhu Z, Guo P, Ju BF (2018) A novel hybrid actuation mechanism based XY nanopositioning stage with totally decoupled kinematics. Mech Syst Signal Process 99:747–759.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringIndustrial University of Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringHo Chi Minh City University of Technology and EducationHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  3. 3.Division of Computational Mechatronics, Institute for Computational ScienceTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  4. 4.Faculty of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations