Advertisement

An ultrasensitive acoustic wave resonator device enabled by gluing a replaceable micropillar film

  • Hamed Esmaeilzadeh
  • Junwei Su
  • Siqi Ji
  • Che-Fu Su
  • George Cernigliaro
  • Marina Ruths
  • Hongwei SunEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Traditional acoustic wave based sensing devices such as quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) rely on the thin films coated on the piezoelectric substrates as the sensing films for chemical and biological detection. This study demonstrates that significant sensitivity enhancement over traditional film based QCM (QCM-F) devices can be achieved by simply attaching a poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) micropillar film onto a QCM substrate (QCM-P) by using a UV-curable glue. Humidity absorption measurements shows that the unique resonance occurred between the micropillars and the piezoelectric substrate improved the mass sensitivity of the QCM sensor by more than eight-fold. In addition, the newly developed QCM-P sensor and traditional QCM-F were utilized to detect bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein immobilization on PMMA surfaces. It was found that the glued QCM-P was capable of measuring BSA at a much lower concentration (200 nM) in comparison to QCM-F (1500 nM). The glue-based micropillar QCM device showed great potential for improving the sensitivity, simplifying the fabrication process, and reducing the cost of QCM sensors for various biosensing and chemical usages.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank MicroChem Corp. (Westborough, MA, USA) for providing PMMA material and financial support to the project.

References

  1. Ballantine DS, White RM, Martin SJ, Zellers ET, Wohltjen H (1997) Acoustic wave sensors: Theory, design and physical-chemical applications, 1st edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg S, Ruths M, Johannsmann D (2002a) High-frequency measurements of interfacial friction using quartz crystal resonators integrated into a surface forces apparatus. Phys Rev E 65(2):026119Google Scholar
  3. Berg S, Johannsmann D, Ruths M (2002b) Frequency response of quartz crystal shear-resonator during an adhesive, elastic contact in a surface forces apparatus. J Appl Phys 92(11):6905–6910Google Scholar
  4. Berg S, Ruths M, Johannsmann D (2003) Quartz crystal resonators with atomically smooth surfaces for use in contact mechanics. Rev Sci Instrum 74(8):3845–3852Google Scholar
  5. Carr-Brion K (1986) Moisture sensors in process control. Elsevier Applied Science; Sole distributor in the USA and Canada. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Chavan CH, Karande PV (2014) Wireless monitoring of soil moisture, temperature & humidity using Zigbee in agriculture. Int J Eng Trends Technol (IJETT) 11(10):493–497Google Scholar
  7. Chou SY, Krauss PR, Renstrom PJ (1996a) Imprint lithography with 25-nanometer resolution. Science 272(5258):85–87Google Scholar
  8. Chou SY, Krauss PR, Renstrom PJ (1996b) Nanoimprint lithography. J Vac Sci Technol B 14(6):4129–4133Google Scholar
  9. Comisu C-C, Taranu N, Boaca G, Scutaru M-C (2017) Structural health monitoring system of bridges. Procedia Eng 199:2054–2059Google Scholar
  10. Esmaeilzadeh H, Cernigliaro G, Su J, Gong L, Mirzaee I, Charmchi M, Sun H (2015) The effects of material properties on pillar-based QCM sensors (57533), V010T13A028Google Scholar
  11. Fukao N, Kyung K-H, Fujimoto K, Shiratori S (2011) Automatic spray-LBL machine based on in-situ QCM monitoring. Macromolecules 44(8):2964–2969Google Scholar
  12. Furusawa H, Ozeki T (2016) DNA compaction determined by energy dissipation measurements on a quartz-crystal oscillator. Microsyst Technol 22(1):65–71Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs J (2001) Immobilization principles—selecting the surface. ELISA Technical Bulletin, Corning Incorporated Life Sciences, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo LJ (2004) Recent progress in nanoimprint technology and its applications. J Phys D Appl Phys 37(11):R123MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo LJ (2007) Nanoimprint lithography: methods and material requirements. Adv Mater 19(4):495–513MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Liping T, Paul T, Wenjing H (2008) Surface chemistry influences implant biocompatibility. Curr Top Med Chem 8(4):270–280Google Scholar
  17. Murphy PJM, Stone OJ, Anderson ME (2011) Automated hydrophobic interaction chromatography column selection for use in protein purification. J Vis Exp 55:3060Google Scholar
  18. Nie J, Meng X (2014) Dew point and relative humidity measurement using a quartz resonant sensor. Microsyst Technol 20(7):1311–1315Google Scholar
  19. Nie J, Meng X (2015) Microscopic verification of sensitive circuits of a quartz resonator applied in dew point recognition. Microsyst Technol 21(3):641–647Google Scholar
  20. Niklas S, Reza Zandi S, Kristinn BG, Tommy H, van der Wouter W (2017) Batch fabrication of polymer microfluidic cartridges for QCM sensor packaging by direct bonding. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 27(12):124001Google Scholar
  21. Okahata Y, Kimura K, Ariga K (1989) Detection of the phase transition of Langmuir–Blodgett films on a quartz-crystal microbalance in an aqueous phase. J Am Chem Soc 111(26):9190–9194Google Scholar
  22. Oliveira ON Jr (1992) Langmuir-Blodgett films—properties and possible applications. Braz J Phys 22(2):60–69Google Scholar
  23. Ostuni E, Grzybowski BA, Mrksich M, Roberts CS, Whitesides GM (2003) Adsorption of proteins to hydrophobic sites on mixed self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 19(5):1861–1872Google Scholar
  24. Percival CJ, Stanley S, Galle M, Braithwaite A, Newton MI, McHale, Hayes W (2001) Molecular-Imprinted, Polymer-Coated Quartz Crystal Microbalances for the Detection of Terpenes. Analytical Chemistry 73(17):4225–4228Google Scholar
  25. Richter RP, Brisson A (2004) QCM-D on mica for parallel QCM-DAFM studies. Langmuir 20(11):4609–4613Google Scholar
  26. Rodahl M, Höök F, Krozer A, Brzezinski P, Kasemo B (1995) Quartz crystal microbalance setup for frequency and Q-factor measurements in gaseous and liquid environments. Rev Sci Instrum 66(7):3924–3930Google Scholar
  27. Sakti SP, Rahmawati E, Robiandi F (2016) Solvent effect on polystyrene surface roughness on top of QCM sensor. AIP Conf Proc 1719(1):030017Google Scholar
  28. Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira MECDR, Oliveira R, Vilar EY-P, Azeredo J (2007) The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 30(3):183–188Google Scholar
  29. Sauerbrey G (1959) Verwendung von Schwingquarzen zur Wägung dünner Schichten und zur Mikrowägung Zeitschrift für Physik (online), pp 206–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01337937
  30. Su J (2017) Investigation of the interaction between liquid and micro/nanostructured surfaces during condensation with quartz crystal microbalance. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts LowellGoogle Scholar
  31. Su X, Wu Y-J, Knoll W (2005) Comparison of surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and quartz crystal microbalance techniques for studying DNA assembly and hybridization. Biosens Bioelectron 21(5):719–726Google Scholar
  32. Su J, Esmaeilzadeh H, Zhang F, Yu Q, Cernigliaro G, Xu J, Sun H (2018) An ultrasensitive micropillar-based quartz crystal microbalance device for real-time measurement of protein immobilization and protein-protein interaction. Biosens Bioelectron 99:325–331Google Scholar
  33. Su J, Esmaeilzadeh H, Wang P, Ji S, Inalpolat M, Charmchi M, Sun H (2019) Effect of wetting states on frequency response of a micropillar-based quartz crystal microbalance. Sens Actuators A 286:115–122Google Scholar
  34. Thourson SB, Marsh CA, Doyle BJ, Timpe SJ (2013) Quartz crystal microbalance study of bovine serum albumin adsorption onto self-assembled monolayer-functionalized gold with subsequent ligand binding. Colloids Surf B 111:707–712Google Scholar
  35. Valero Vidal C, Olmo Juan A, Igual Muñoz A (2010) Adsorption of bovine serum albumin on CoCrMo surface: effect of temperature and protein concentration. Colloids Surf B 80(1):1–11Google Scholar
  36. Wang P (2014) Development and applications of QCM-P devices. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts LowellGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang P, Su J, Su C-F, Dai W, Cernigliaro G, Sun H (2014a) An ultrasensitive quartz crystal microbalance-micropillars based sensor for humidity detection. J Appl Phys 115(22):224501Google Scholar
  38. Wang P, Su J, Su C-F, Dai W, Cernigliaro G, Sun H (2014) An ultrasensitive quartz crystal microbalance-micropillars based sensor for humidity detection. J Appl Phys (Online), 224501. http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jap/115/22/10.1063/1.4880316
  39. Wang P, Su J, Su C-F, Dai W, Cernigliaro G, Sun H (2014c) Ultrasensitive quartz crystal microbalance enabled by micropillar structure. Appl Phys Lett 104(4):043504Google Scholar
  40. Wang P, Su J, Gong L, Shen M, Ruths M, Sun H (2015) Numerical simulation and experimental study of resonance characteristics of QCM-P devices operating in liquid and their application in biological detection. Sens Actuators B Chem 220:1320–1327Google Scholar
  41. Wingqvist G (2012) Thin-film electro-acoustic sensors based on AlN and its alloys: possibilities and limitations. Microsyst Technol 18(7):1213–1223Google Scholar
  42. Ying P, Jin G, Tao Z (2004) Competitive adsorption of collagen and bovine serum albumin—effect of the surface wettability. Colloids Surf B 33(3–4):259–263Google Scholar
  43. Yoo HY, Bruckenstein S (2013) A novel quartz crystal microbalance gas sensor based on porous film coatings. A high sensitivity porous poly(methylmethacrylate) water vapor sensor. Anal Chim Acta 785:98–103Google Scholar
  44. Zhu Y, Yuan H, Xu J, Xu P, Pan Q (2010) Highly stable and sensitive humidity sensors based on quartz crystal microbalance coated with hexagonal lamelliform monodisperse mesoporous silica SBA-15 thin film. Sens Actuators B Chem 144(1):164–169Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamed Esmaeilzadeh
    • 1
  • Junwei Su
    • 1
  • Siqi Ji
    • 1
  • Che-Fu Su
    • 1
  • George Cernigliaro
    • 2
  • Marina Ruths
    • 3
  • Hongwei Sun
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA
  2. 2.MicroChem Corp.WestboroughUSA
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA

Personalised recommendations