Advertisement

Solvent-based bonding of PMMA–PMMA for microfluidic applications

  • Mohammad M. Faghih
  • M. Keith Sharp
Technical Paper
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Solvent bonding is a simple, inexpensive and quick technique used for joining microfluidic parts made of thermoplastic polymers that results in high bonding strength and good optical clarity. However, selecting the right solvent as well as the curing conditions is an important step in providing a successful bond that ensures an appropriate bonding without squeeze-out and clogging of microchannels. In this study, different solvent mixtures and solvent phases (i.e., liquid vs. vapor), as well as a range of curing times and temperatures, were tested to bond poly(methyl methacrylate) samples. Additionally, effect of corona surface modification was also examined on bonding quality. Results were compared in terms of bonding strength and optical clarity. A solvent mixture of 20% dichloromethane and 80% isopropanol showed the greatest bonding strength (4.2 MPa, based on tensile test), while vaporized dichloromethane had the best optical clarity (only 2.22% reduction in power transmittance). Coronal surface modification also showed a 25% increase in bonding strength and 2% improvement on optical clarity, for 20% dichloromethane and 80% isopropanol solution at room temperature and curing time of 15 min.

Notes

References

  1. Akhil AV et al (2016) Vaporized solvent bonding of polymethyl methacrylate. J Adhes Sci Technol 30:826–841.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1125721 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamshad A, Nikfarjam A, Khaleghi H (2016) A new simple and fast thermally-solvent assisted method to bond PMMA-PMMA in micro-fluidics devices. J Micromech Microengineering J Micromech Microeng 26:065017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke J (1984) Solubility parameters : theory and application. Book and paper group annual, pp 13–58Google Scholar
  4. Faustino V, Pinho D, Yaginuma T, Calhelha RC, Ferreira ICFR, Lima R (2014a) Extensional flow-based microfluidic device: deformability assessment of red blood cells in contact with tumor cells. BioChip J 8:42–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13206-014-8107-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Faustino V et al (2014b) Flow of red blood cells suspensions through hyperbolic microcontractions. In: Lima R, Imai Y, Ishikawa T, Oliveira NMS (eds) Visualization and simulation of complex flows in biomedical engineering. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 151–163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7769-9_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gedde UW (2001) Polymer physicsGoogle Scholar
  7. Hsu YC, Chen TY (2007) Applying Taguchi methods for solvent-assisted PMMA bonding technique for static and dynamic micro-TAS devices. Biomed Microdev 9:513–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-007-9059-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lin C-H, Chao C-H, Lan C-W (2007) Low azeotropic solvent for bonding of PMMA microfluidic devices. Sensors Actuators B: Chem 121:698–705.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2006.04.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mona R, Sumanpreet C, Dan S, Parameswaran M (2010) Microwave-induced, thermally assisted solvent bonding for low-cost PMMA microfluidic devices. J Micromech Microeng 20:015026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Muccio EA (1995) Plastic part technology. ASM International, [S.l.]Google Scholar
  11. Ng SP, Wiria FE, Tay NB (2016) Low distortion solvent bonding of microfluidic chips. Procedia Engineering 141:130–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.09.212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nyström M, Tamaddon Jahromi HR, Stading M, Webster MF (2017) Hyperbolic contraction measuring systems for extensional flow. Mech Time-Dependent Mater 21:455–479.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-017-9337-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Temiz Y, Lovchik RD, Kaigala GV, Delamarche E (2015) Lab-on-a-chip devices: how to close and plug the lab? Microelectron Eng 132:156–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2014.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tran HH, Wu W, Lee NY (2013) Ethanol and UV-assisted instantaneous bonding of PMMA assemblies and tuning in bonding reversibility. Sensors Actuators B: Chem 181:955–962.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.11.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Troughton MJ (2008) Handbook of plastics joining : a practical guide. William Andrew Inc., Norwich, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. Tsao C-W, DeVoe DL (2009) Bonding of thermoplastic polymer microfluidics. Microfluid Nanofluid 6:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Umbrecht F, Müller D, Gattiker F, Boutry CM, Neuenschwander J, Sennhauser U, Hierold C (2009) Solvent assisted bonding of polymethylmethacrylate: characterization using the response surface methodology. Sens Actuators, A 156:121–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2009.03.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wan AMD, Moore TA, Young EWK, Moore TA, Young EWK (2017) Solvent bonding for fabrication of PMMA and COP microfluidic devices. J Visualized Exp 17:55175Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biofluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations