Advertisement

Carbon nanotubes effects in magneto nanofluid flow over a curved stretching surface with variable viscosity

  • S. Nadeem
  • Z. Ahmed
  • S. Saleem
Technical Paper
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

The present study investigates the influence of temperature dependent viscosity on dynamics of pressure driven nanofluid flow over a curved surface. A uniform applied magnetic field perpendicular to the surface is taken into consideration. Governing nonlinear partial differential equations are modeled with the help of boundary layer approximation. Suitable similarity transformations are used to convert governing equations into nonlinear ordinary differential equations. These highly nonlinear ordinary differential equations are then solved with the help of a second order implicit finite difference scheme. Graphical and numerical results depict the impact of temperature sensitive viscosity and other physical parameters on flow of nanofluid. Viscosity parameter evidently resist the flow velocity and rise the temperature distribution in the nanofluid. It also increases the Skin friction near the boundary of the fluid.

LIst of symbols

\( u, v \)

Velocities along s and r axis, respectively

\( {\rho_{nf}}, {\mu_{nf}} \)

Effective density and dynamic viscosity of nanofluid

\( p \)

Fluid pressure

\( B\left( t \right), \sigma \)

Magnetic field and electric charge density, respectively

\( {\sigma_e} \)

Stefan Boltzmann constant

\( \kappa \)

Curvature parameter

\( T \)

Fluid temperature

\( {T_w}, {T_\infty } \)

Temperature at the boundary and at far away, respectively

\( f, \theta \)

Dimensionless velocity and temperature, respectively

\( {\theta_r} \)

Dimensionless Variable viscosity parameter

\( {K_{nf}}, {\alpha_{nf}} \)

Thermal conductivity and diffusivity of nanofluid

\( \phi \)

Volume fraction of CNT

\( {\beta_R} \)

Mean absorption constant

\( M, Pr \)

Magnetic parameter and Prandtl number, respectively

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia for providing administrative and technical support.

References

  1. Abedini A, Armaghani T, Chamkha AJ (2018) MHD free convection heat transfer of a water–Fe3O4 nanofluid in a baffled C-shaped enclosure. J Therm Anal Calorim.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7225-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbar NS, Raza M, Ellahi R (2015) CNT suspended CuO + H2O nano fluid and energy analysis for the peristaltic flow in a permeable channel. Alex Eng J 54:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akbar NS, Kazmi N, Tripathi D, Mir NA (2016) Study of heat transfer on physiological driven movement with CNT nanofluids and variable viscosity. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 136:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akbar NS, Huda AB, Habib MB et al (2018) Nanoparticles shape effects on peristaltic transport of nanofluids in presence of magnetohydrodynamics. Microsyst Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-018-3963-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alrashed AAAA, Gharibdousti MS, Goodarzi M, Oliveira LR, Safaei MR, Filho EPB (2018) Effects on thermophysical properties of carbon based nanofluids: experimental data, modelling using regression, ANFIS and ANN. Int J Heat Mass Transf 125:920–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianco A, Kostarelos K, Prato M (2005) Applications of carbon nanotubes in drug delivery. Curr Opin Chem Biol 9:674–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakraborty T, Das K, Kundu PK (2016) Framing the impact of external magnetic field on bioconvection of a nanofluid flow containing gyrotactic microorganisms with convective boundary conditions. Alex Eng JGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi SUS, Eastman JA (1995) Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Argonne National Lab, ILGoogle Scholar
  9. Diglio G, Roselli C, Sasso M, Channabasappa UJ (2018) Borehole heat exchanger with nanofluids as heat carrier. Geothermics 72:112–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huminic G, Huminic A (2012) Application of nanofluids in heat exchangers: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:5625–5638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kandasamy R, Muhammad R (2016) Thermal radiation energy on squeezed MHD flow of Cu, Al2O3 and CNTs-nanofluid over a sensor surface. Alex Eng J 55:2405–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan M, Shahid A, Salahuddin T et al (2018) Heat and mass diffusions for Casson nanofluid flow over a stretching surface with variable viscosity and convective boundary conditions. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40:533.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1415-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koca HD, Doganay S, Turgut A, Tavman IH, Saidur R, Mahbubul IM (2017) Effect of particle size on the viscosity of nanofluids: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017:13Google Scholar
  14. Li R, Wu R, Zhao L, Hu Z, Guo S, Pan X, Zou H (2011) Folate and iron difunctionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes as dual-targeted drug nanocarrier to cancer cells. Carbon NY 49:1797–1805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li Z, Sheikholeslami M, Shafee A, Saleem S, Chamkha AJ (2018a) Effect of dispersing nanoparticles on solidification process in existence of Lorenz forces in a permeable media. Journal of Molecular Liquids 266:181–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Z, Saleem S, Shafee A, Chamkha AJ, Du S (2018b) Analytical investigation of nanoparticle migration in a duct considering thermal radiation. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7517-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehmood R, Rana S, Akbar NS, Nadeem S (2017a) Non-aligned stagnation point flow of radiating Casson fluid over a stretching surface. Alex Eng J 2017:2Google Scholar
  18. Mehmood R, Nadeem S, Saleem S, Akbar NS (2017b) Flow and Heat Transfer analysis of a Jeffery Nano fluid impinging obliquely over a stretched plate. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 74:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mukhopadhyay S, Layek GC (2008) Effect of thermal radiation and variable fluid viscosity on free convective and heat transfer past a porous stretching surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51(9–10):2167–2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nadeem S, Shehzadi I (2016) Single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) analysis on peristaltic flow in an inclined tube with permeable walls. Int J Heat Mass Transf 97:794–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nadeem S, Arif AU, Saleem S (2016) A comparative analysis on different nanofluid models for the oscillatory stagnation point flow. Eur Phys J Plus 131:261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nadeem S, Ahmad S, Muhammad N (2018) Computational study of Falkner–Skan problem for a static and moving wedge. Sens Actuators B Chem 263:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Noreen S, Qasim M, Khan ZH (2015) MHD pressure driven flow of nanofluid in curved channel. J Magn Magn Mater 393:490–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Okechi NF, Jalil M, Asghar S (2017) Flow of viscous fluid along an exponentially stretching curved surface. Res Phys 7:2851–2854Google Scholar
  25. Putra N, Iskandar FN (2011) Application of nanofluids to a heat pipe liquid-block and the thermoelectric cooling of electronic equipment. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 35:1274–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roşca NC, Pop I (2015) Unsteady boundary layer flow over a permeable curved stretching/shrinking surface. Eur J Mech 51:61–67MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saito R, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus MS (1998) Physical properties of carbon nanotubes. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saleem S, Awais M, Nadeem S, Sandeep N, Mustafa MT (2017) Theoretical analysis of upper-convected Maxwell fluid flow with Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. Chin J Phys 55:1615–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saleem S, Nadeem S, Rashidi MM et al (2018) An optimal analysis of radiated nanomaterial flow with viscous dissipation and heat source. Microsyst Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-018-3996-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheikhalipour T, Abbassi A (2018) Numerical analysis of nanofluid flow inside a trapezoidal microchannel using different approaches. Adv Powder Technol 29:1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sheikholeslami M, Shahzad SA (2017) Thermal radiation of ferrofluid in existence of Lorentz forces considering variable viscosity. Int J Heat Mass Transf 109:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheikholeslami M, Ghasemi A, Li Z, Shafee A, Saleem S (2018a) Influence of CuO nanoparticles on heat transfer behavior of PCM in solidification process considering radiative source term. Int. J Heat Mass Transf 126(A):1252–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sheikholeslami M, Jafaryar M, Saleem S, Li Z, Shafee A, Jiang Y (2018b) Nanofluid heat transfer augmentation and exergy loss inside a pipe equipped with innovative turbulators. Int J Heat Mass Transf 126(B):156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sheikholeslami M, Shehzad SA, Li Z et al (2018c) Time dependent conduction heat transfer during solidification in a storage system using nanoparticles. Microsyst Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-018-4050-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sidik NAC, Yazid MNAWM, Mamat R (2015) A review on the application of nanofluids in vehicle engine cooling system. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 68:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xue Q-Z (2003) Model for effective thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Phys Lett A 307:313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsQuaid-i-Azam University, 45320IslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, College of SciencesKing Khalid UniversityAbhaSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations