Advertisement

A design method for nanofluidic circuits

  • Yongbin Zhang
Technical Paper

Abstract

A design method is proposed for nanofluidic circuits, based on the flow equation for a nanoscale fluid flow. This method incorporates the use of the concepts of the flow resistance, the flow rate, the pressure drop and the power loss, as like in electric circuits. The equations for calculating the flow resistance and the power loss in exemplary nanofluidic circuits including in a nanotube tree are presented. It was found that the nanotube size and the fluid-tube wall interaction both have great influences on the flow resistance and the power loss in nanochannel flow. Exemplary design analysis is given for some nanofluidic circuits, based on the proposed method.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest with this research.

References

  1. Abraham FF (1978) The interfacial density profile of a Lennard-Jones fluid in contact with a (100) Lennard-Jones wall and its relationship to idealized fluid/wall systems: a Monte Carlo simulation. J Chem Phys 68:3713–3716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguillela VM, Alcaraz A (2009) A fluid approach to simple circuits. Nat Nanotech 4:403–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn DJ (2008) Nano pump using molecular motor. US Patent App. 12/200,888Google Scholar
  4. Alibakhshi MA, Xie Q, Li Y, Duan C (2016) Accurate measurement of liquid transport through nanoscale conduits. Sci Rep 6:24936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aubert JH, Tirrell M (1982) Effective viscosity of dilute polymer solutions near confining boundaries. J Chem Phys 77:553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bitsanis I, Magda JJ, Tirrell M, Davis HT (1987) Molecular dynamics of flow in micropores. J Chem Phys 87:1733–1750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bojko A, Andreatta G, Montagne F, Renaud P, Pugin R (2014) Fabrication of thermo-responsive nano-valve by grafting-to in melt of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) onto nanoporous silicon nitride membranes. J Membr Sci 468:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan DYC, Horn RG (1985) The drainage of thin liquid films between solid surfaces. J Chem Phys 83:5311–5324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chauveteau G, Tirrell M, Omari A (1984) Concentration dependence of the effective viscosity of polymer solutions in small pores with repulsive or attractive walls. J Coll Int Sci 100:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daiguji H, Yang P, Majumdar A (2004) Ion transport in nanofluidic channels. Nano Lett 4:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daiguji H, Oka Y, Shirono K (2005) Nanofluidic diode and bipolar transistor. Nano Lett 5:2274–2280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duan C, Majumdar A (2010) Anomalous ion transport in 2-nm hydrophilic nanochannels. Nat Nanotech 5:848–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuest M, Boone C, Rangharajan KK, Conlisk AT, Prakash S (2015) A three-state nanofluidic field effect switch. Nano Lett 15:2365–2371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuest M, Rangharajan KK, Boone C, Conlisk AT, Prakash S (2017) Cation dependent surface charge regulation in gated nanofluidic devices. Anal Chem 89:1593–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horn RG, Smith DT, Haller W (1989) Surface forces and viscosity of water measured between silica sheets. Chem Phys Lett 162:404–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Humplik T, Lee J, O’Hern SC, Fellman BA, Baig MA, Hassan SF, Atieh MA, Rahman F, Laoui T, Karnik R, Wang EN (2011) Nanostructured materials for water desalination. Nanotech 22:292001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jabbarzadeh A, Atkinson JD, Tanner RI (1997) Rheological properties of thin liquid films by molecular dynamics simulations. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 69:169–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karnik R, Fan R, Yue M, Li D, Yang P, Majumdar A (2005) Electrostatic control of ions and molecules in nanofluidic transistors. Nano Lett 5:943–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karnik R, Castelino K, Majumdar A (2006) Field-effect control of protein transport in a nanofluidic transistor circuit. Appl Phys Lett 88:123114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kasiteropoulou D, Karakasidis TE, Liakopoulos A (2013) Mesoscopic simulation of fluid flow in periodically grooved microchannels. Comput Fluids 74:91–101CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee KP, Leese H, Matia D (2012) Water flow enhancement in hydrophilic nanochannels. Nanoscale 4:2621–2627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liakopoulos A, Sofos F, Karakasidis TE (2016) Friction factor in nanochannel flows. Microfluid Nanofluid 20:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liakopoulos A, Sofos F, Karakasidis TE (2017) Darcy–Weisbach friction factor at the nanoscale: from atomistic calculations to continuum models. Phys Fluids 29:052003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Magda JJ, Tirrell M, Davis HT (1985) Molecular dynamics of narrow, liquid-filled Pores. J Chem Phys 83:1888–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer E, Overney RM, Dransfeld K, Gyalog T (1998) Nanoscience-friction and rheology on the nanometer scale. World Scientific Press, River edgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perry JL, Kandlikar SG (2006) Review of fabrication of nanochannels for single phase liquid flow. Microfluid Nanofluid 2:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pinti M, Kambham T, Wang B, Prakash S (2013) Fabrication of centimeter long, ultra-low aspect ratio nanochannel networks in borosilicate glass substrates. ASME J Nanotech Eng Med 4:021003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Piruska A, Gong M, Sweedler JV, Bohn PW (2010) Nanofluidics in chemical analysis. Chem Soc Rev 39:1060–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Plecis A, Schoch RB, Renaud P (2005) Ionic transport phenomena in nanofluidics: experimental and theoretical study of the exclusion-enrichment effect on a chip. Nano Lett 5:1147–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prakash S, Conlisk AT (2016) Field effect nanofluidics. Lab Chip 16:3855–3865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prakash S, Zambrano H, Rosenthal-Kim EQ (2015) Electrokinetic transport in silica nanochannels with asymmetric surface charge. Microfluid Nanofluid 19:1455–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rahmatipour H, Azimian AR, Atlaschian O (2017) Study of fluid flow behavior in smooth and rough nanochannels through oscillatory wall by molecular dynamics simulation. Physica A Stat Mech Appl 465:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sofos F, Karakasidis TE, Liakopoulos A (2013) Parameters affecting the slip length at the nanoscale. J Comput Theor Nanosci 10:648–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Somers SA, Davis HT (1992) Microscopic dynamics of fluids confined between smooth and atomically structured solid surfaces. J Chem Phys 96:5389–5407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stein D, Kruithof M, Dekker C (2004) Surface-charge-governed ion transport in nanofluidic channels. Phy Rev Lett 93:035901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Takaba H, Onumata Y, Nakao S (2007) Molecular simulation of pressure-driven fluid flow in nanoporous membranes. J Chem Phys 127:054703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wei C (2007) Implantable nano pump for drug delivery. US Patent App. 11/906,238Google Scholar
  38. Yu M, Falconer JL, Amundsen TJ, Hong M, Noble RD (2007) A controllable nanometer-sized valve. Adv Mater 19:3032–3036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang YB (2006) Flow factor of non-continuum fluids in one-dimensional flow. Ind Lubr Tribol 58:151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang YB (2015) A quantitative comparison between the flow factor approach model and the molecular dynamics simulation results for the flow of a confined molecularly thin fluid film. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 29:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang YB (2016a) The flow equation for a nanoscale fluid flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 92:1004–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang YB (2016b) Calculating the maximum flowing velocity of the Poiseuille flow in a nano channel by the flow factor approach model. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 73:111–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang YB (2016c) Effect of wall surface roughness on the mass transfer in a nano channel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 100:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang YB (2017a) Transport in nanotube tree. Int J Heat Mass Transf 114:536–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang YB (2017b) Influence of pore wall surface property on flux of nanoporous filtering membrane. Front Heat Mass Transf 9:26Google Scholar
  46. Zhang YB (2018) Optimum design for cylindrical-shaped nanoporous filtration membrane. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.06.003
  47. Zhang W, Li D (2007) Simulation of low speed 3D nanochannel flow. Microfluid Nanofluid 3:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical EngineeringChangzhou UniversityChangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations