Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 307–318 | Cite as

Experimental and numerical investigation on particle–particle interaction of multi-particle separation in an alternating and repetitive microchannel

  • S. Cadirci
  • D. Ince
  • I. Ghanem
  • S. Z. Birol
  • L. Trabzon
  • H. Turhan
Technical Paper


Inertial focusing plays a major role in size-based cell separation or enrichment for microfluidic applications in many medical areas such as diagnostics and treatment. These applications often deal with suspensions of different particles which cause interactions between particles with different diameters such as particle–particle collision. In this study, particle–particle interaction in a laminar flow through a low aspect ratio alternating and repetitive microchannel is investigated both numerically and experimentally. It is revealed that particle–particle collision affects high quality particle focusing. computational fluid dynamics simulations are conducted for demonstrating the effect of the flow field in the transverse cross-section on the focusing quality and position. The experiments and simulations both revealed that if the flow is seeded with a mixture of particles of 3.3 and 9.9 µm diameters, the quality of focusing intensity is degenerated compared to the focusing features obtained by particles with a diameter of 9.9 µm solely. The results clearly show that particle–particle collision between the 3.3 and 9.9 µm particles has a negative effect on particle focusing behavior of the 9.9 µm particles.



We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) through the project ‘Investigation on the Effects of Mechanical Forces on Endothel Cells Behavior by Using Microfluidics Systems in the domain of Mechanobiology’ with the Grant number 114R037.


  1. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 15.0 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. Berger S, Talbot L (1983) Flow in curved pipes. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 15:461–512CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhagat AAS, Kuntaegowdanahalli SS, Papautsky I (2008) Continuous particle separation in spiral microchannels using Dean flows and differential migration. Lab Chip 8(11):1906–1914. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dean WR (1928) Fluid motion in a curved channel. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci 121(787):402–420CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Carlo D (2009) Inertial microfluidics. Lab Chip 9(21):3038–3046. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Carlo D, Irimia D, Tompkins R, Toner M (2007) Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(48):18892–18897. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Carlo D, Edd JF, Irimia D, Tompkins RG, Toner M (2008) Equilibrium separation and filtration of particles using differential inertial focusing. Anal Chem 80(6):2204–2211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falcon M (1984) Secondary flow in curved open channels. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 16:179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gossett DR, Di Carlo D (2009) Particle focusing mechanisms in curving confined flows. Anal Chem 81(20):8459–8465. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green JV, Kniazeva T, Abedi M, Sokhey DS, Taslim ME, Murthy SK (2008) Effect of channel geometry on cell adhesion in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 9(5):677–685. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ho BP, Leal LG (1974) Inertial migration of rigid spheres in two dimensional unidirectional flows. J Fluid Mech 65(2):365–400. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Holm SH, Beech JP, Barrett MP, Tegenfeldt JO (2011) Separation of parasites from human blood using deterministic lateral displacement. Lab Chip 11(7):1326–1332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang LR, Cox EC, Austin RH, Sturm JC (2004) Continuous particle separation through deterministic lateral displacement. Science 304:987–990. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaber S, Sonmez U, Trabzon L (2017) Super-enhanced particle focusing in a novel microchannel geometry using inertial microfluidics. J Micromech Microeng 27(6):065003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mao X, Lin SC, Dong C, Huang T (2009) Single-layer planar on-chip flow cytometer using microfluidic drifting based three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic focusing. Lab Chip 9:1583–1589. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martel JM, Toner M (2012) Inertial focusing dynamics in spiral microchannels. Phys Fluids 24(3):032001. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martel JM, Toner M (2014) Inertial focusing in microfluidics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16(1):371–396. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nam J, Namgung B, Lim CT, Bae JE, Leo HL, Cho KS, Kim S (2015) Microfluidic device for sheathless particle focusing and separation using a viscoelastic fluid. J Chromatogr A 1406:244–250. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oakey J, Applegate R Jr, Arellano E, Di Carlo D (2010) Particle focusing in staged inertial microfluidic devices for flow cytometry. Anal Chem 82:3862–3867. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ookawara S, Higashi R, Street D, Ogawa K (2004) Feasibility study on concentration of slurry and classification of contained particles by microchannel. Chem Eng J 101(1):171–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Radisic M, Iyer RK, Murthy SK (2006) Micro- and nanotechnology in cell separation. Int J Nanomed 1:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramachandraiah H, Ardabili S, Faridi AM, Gantelius J, Kowalewski JM, Mårtensson G, Russom A (2014) Dean flow-coupled inertial focusing in curved channels. Biomicrofluidics 8(3):034117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saffman PG (1965) The lift on a small sphere in a slow shear flow. J Fluid Mech 22(2):385–400. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Segré G, Silberberg A (1961) Radial particle displacements in Poiseuille flow of suspensions. Nature 189(4760):209–210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toner M, Irimia D (2005) Blood-on-a-chip. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 7:77–103. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang L, Dandy DS (2017) High-throughput inertial focusing of micrometer- and sub-micrometer-sized particles separation. Adv Sci 4:1700153. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Winer MH, Ahmadi A, Cheung KC (2014) Transient inertial flows: A new degree of freedom for particle focusing in microfluidic channels. In: Micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS), 2014 IEEE 27th international conference on. IEEE, pp 1051–1054Google Scholar
  28. Yang S, Kim JY, Lee SJ, Kim JM (2011) Sheathless elasto-inertial particle focusing and continuous separation in a straight rectangular microchannel. Lab Chip 11:266–273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zuvin M, Mansur N, Birol SZ, Sayi-Yazgan A, Trabzon L (2016) Human breast cancer cell enrichment by Dean flow driven microfluidic channels. Microsyst Technol 22(3):645–652. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Cadirci
    • 1
  • D. Ince
    • 1
  • I. Ghanem
    • 1
  • S. Z. Birol
    • 2
  • L. Trabzon
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. Turhan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Nanoscience and Nano-engineeringIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations