Advertisement

Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 139–149 | Cite as

Simulating the performance of ring-based coriolis vibrating gyroscopic sensors

  • Davin JieEmail author
Technical Paper
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a mathematical model for an imperfect ring gyroscope exhibiting spatial variations of the mass and stiffness of the ring arising from manufacturing imperfections and simulates the dynamics of the resonating ring dictating its performance under practical operating conditions. Actual tests performed on real devices involve significant costs and procedures, so the work aims to achieve the same aim with high fidelity models. The model used investigates the effects of shock and frequency splits between the drive and sense modes on the performance of the sensor in relation to the extent of the spatial mass and stiffness variations in the resonating ring. Severe reductions in shock tolerance are observed at shorter shock pulse durations. Small frequency splits between the drive and sense modes have minimal effects on the shock tolerance and the ring’s sense mode amplitude when excited electrostatically, but sharply increase the zero-rate readout (bias) and decrease the sensor’s sensitivity to angular velocity changes (scale factor). The extent of the tolerable frequency splits is limited by the half-power bandwidth of the sense mode, which is predominantly influenced by the system damping.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Stewart McWilliam (University of Nottingham) for the supervision of this research work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acar C, Shkel A (2009) MEMS vibratory gyroscopes: structural approaches to improve robustness. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang C-O, Chang G-E, Chou C-S, Chien W-TC, Chen P-C (2008) In-plane free vibration of a single-crystal silicon ring. Int J Solids Struct 45(24):6114–6132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.033 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Kawiecki G (2001) Modal damping measurement for damage detection. Smart Mater Struct 10(3):466–471.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Langmaid C (1996) Vibrating structure gyroscopes. Sensor Rev 16(1):14–17.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02602289610108357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ning L, Zhong S, Qing L, MengYin F, Hong L, JunFang F (2013) Characterization of the bell-shaped vibratory angular rate gyro. Sensors 13(8):10123–10150.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s130810123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Prikhodko I, Zotov SA, Trusov AA, Shkel AM (2012) Foucault pendulum on a chip: rate integrating silicon MEMS gyroscope. Sens Actuators A 177:67–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2012.01.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rourke AK, McWilliam S, Fox CHJ (2002) Multi-mode trimming of imperfect thin rings using masses at pre-selected locations. J Sound Vib 256(2):319–345.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.4211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Serrano DE, Zaman MF, Rahafrooz A, Hrudey P, Lipka R, Younkin D, Nagpal S, Jafri I, Ayazi F (2016) Substrate-decoupled, bulk-acoustic wave gyroscopes: design and evaluation of next-generation environmentally robust devices. Microsyst Nanoeng 2(1):16015.  https://doi.org/10.1038/micronano.2016.15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tehrani, PT, Izyumin O, Izyumin I, Ahn CH, Ng EJ, Hong VA, Yang Y, Kenny TW, Boser BE, Horsley DA (2015) Disk resonator gyroscope with whole-angle mode operation. IEEE Int Symp Inertial Sens Syst (ISISS). IEEE, Hapuna Beach.  https://doi.org/10.1109/isiss.2015.7102360
  10. Tsai N-C, Sue C-Y (2010) Experimental analysis and characterization of electrostatic-drive tri-axis micro-gyroscope. Sens Actuators A 158(2):231–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2010.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Weng J-H, Chieng W-Hua, Lai J-Min (2005) Structural design and analysis of micromachined ring-type vibrating sensor of both yaw rate and linear acceleration. Sens Actuators A 117(2):230–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2004.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Xin Z, Yu-lie W, Xue-zhong W, Yong-meng Z, Yu Z (2016) A novel ring gyroscope based on side-piezo electrodes. J Cent South Univ 23(3):555–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-016-3102-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yoon SW (2009) Vibration isolation and shock protection for MEMS. Ph.D. Thesis, Electrical Engineering, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  14. Yoon SW, Lee S, Najafi K (2011) Vibration sensitivity analysis of MEMS vibratory ring gyroscopes. Sens Actuators A 171(2):163–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2011.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Young WC, Budynas RG (2002) Roark’s formulas for stress and strain. 7. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang Wen-Ming, Yan Han, Peng Zhi-Ke, Meng Guang (2014) Electrostatic pull-in instability in MEMS/NEMS: a review. Sens Actuators A 214:187–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2014.04.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhuravelev VPh (2015) On the precession of the elliptic mode shape of a circular ring owing to nonlinear effects. Mech Solids 50(1):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S002565441501001X CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Nottingham, Malaysia CampusSemenyihMalaysia

Personalised recommendations