Crack mathematical modeling to study the vibration analysis of cracked micro beams based on the MCST

Technical Paper
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a new approach is presented to capture size effect on the dynamic behavior of a cracked micro beam based on the modified couple stress theory (MCST). Firstly, the stiffness of equivalent torsional spring at the crack location is obtained based on the MCST and also considering the stress intensity factor for different models of the open edge crack. To capture size dependency, the governing equations of motion of the system and also associated boundary conditions are derived based on the MCST and using Hamilton’s principle and stress intensity factor at crack location. Then the natural frequencies of the cracked micro beam are determined. Finally, the variation of natural frequencies of the system are studied with respect to different values of the system parameters such as the material length scale parameter, crack depth, crack location, based on the MCST and considering the newly proposed modeling of the local stiffness at the crack location. The results show that the crack depth, crack location, and also the material length scale parameter are extremely effective on lateral vibrations characteristics of the system.

References

  1. Akbaş ŞD (2017) Free vibration of edge cracked functionally graded microscale beams based on the modified couple stress theory. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 17(03):1750033MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alinaghizadeh F, Shariati M, Fish J (2017) Bending analysis of size-dependent functionally graded annular sector microplates based on the modified couple stress theory. Appl Math Model.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.02.018 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Alsabbagh ASY, Abuzeid OM, Dado MH (2009) Simplified stress correction factor to study the dynamic behavior of a cracked beam. Appl Math Model 33(1):127–139CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Asghari M, Kahrobaiyan MH, Rahaeifard M, Ahmadian MT (2011) Investigation of the size effects in Timoshenko beams based on the couple stress theory. Arch Appl Mech 81(7):863–874CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Askari AR, Tahani M (2017) Size-dependent dynamic pull-in analysis of geometric non-linear micro-plates based on the modified couple stress theory. Phys E 86:262–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2016.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown W, Srawley J (1966) Plane strain crack toughness testing of high strength metallic materials. Plane strain crack toughness testing of high strength metallic materials. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang WJ, Lee HL, Chen TYF (2008) Study of the sensitivity of the first four flexural modes of an AFM cantilever with a sidewall probe. Ultramicroscopy 108(7):619–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chong AC, Lam DC (1999) Strain gradient plasticity effect in indentation hardness of polymers. J Mater Res 14(10):4103–4110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coutu RA, Kladitis PE, Starman LA, Reid JR (2004) A comparison of micro-switch analytic, finite element, and experimental results. Sens Actuators A Phys 115(2):252–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dado MHF, Abuzeid O (2003) Coupled transverse and axial vibratory behaviour of cracked beam with end mass and rotary inertia. J Sound Vib 261(4):675–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dai HL, Wang YK, Wang L (2015) Nonlinear dynamics of cantilevered microbeams based on modified couple stress theory. Int J Eng Sci 94:103–112MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eringen AC (1972) Nonlocal polar elastic continua. Int J Eng Sci 10(1):1–16MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Ewalds HL, Wnahill RJH (1984) Fracture mechanics. Edward Arnold and Delftse Uitgevers Maatschappij, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleck NA, Muller GM, Ashby MF, Hutchinson JW (1994) Strain gradient plasticity: theory and experiment. Acta Metall Mater 42(2):475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghiasi EK (2016) Application of modified couple stress theory to study dynamic characteristics of electrostatically actuated micro-beams resting upon squeeze-film damping under mechanical shock. Int J Adv Mech Eng 6(1):1–15. ISSN 2250-3234Google Scholar
  16. Guo J, Chen J, Pan E (2017) Free vibration of three-dimensional anisotropic layered composite nanoplates based on modified couple-stress theory. Phys E 87:98–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2016.11.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gurtin ME, Murdoch AI (1978) Surface stress in solids. Int J Solids Struct 14(6):431–440CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasheminejad SM, Gheshlaghi B, Mirzaei Y, Abbasion S (2011) Free transverse vibrations of cracked nanobeams with surface effects. Thin Solid Films 519(8):2477–2482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. He D, Yang W, Chen W (2017) A size-dependent composite laminated skew plate model based on a new modified couple stress theory. Acta Mech Solid Sin 30(1):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu YC, Chang CM, Huang SC (2004) Some design considerations on the electrostatically actuated microstructures. Sens Actuators A 112(1):155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khorshidi MA, Shaat M, Abdelkefi A, Shariati M (2017) Nonlocal modeling and buckling features of cracked nanobeams with von Karman nonlinearity. Appl Phys A 123(1):62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lam DC, Chong AC (1999) Indentation model and strain gradient plasticity law for glassy polymers. J Mater Res 14(09):3784–3788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lam DC, Yang F, Chong ACM, Wang J, Tong P (2003) Experiments and theory in strain gradient elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 51(8):1477–1508CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee HL, Chang WJ (2008) Coupled lateral bending-torsional vibration sensitivity of atomic force microscope cantilever. Ultramicroscopy 108(8):707–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang LN, Ke LL, Wang YS, Yang J, Kitipornchai S (2015) Flexural vibration of an atomic force microscope cantilever based on modified couple stress theory. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 15(07):1540025MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu SJ, Qi SH, Zhang WM (2013) Vibration behavior of a cracked micro-cantilever beam under electrostatic excitation. J Vib Shock 32(17):41–45Google Scholar
  27. Loya J, López-Puente J, Zaera R, Fernández-Sáez J (2009) Free transverse vibrations of cracked nanobeams using a nonlocal elasticity model. J Appl Phys 105(4):044309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lun FY, Zhang P, Gao FB, Jia HG (2006) Design and fabrication of micro-optomechanical vibration sensor. Microfabr Technol 120(1):61–64Google Scholar
  29. Ma HM, Gao XL, Reddy JN (2008) A microstructure-dependent Timoshenko beam model based on a modified couple stress theory. J Mech Phys Solids 56(12):3379–3391MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Mindlin RD, Tiersten HF (1962) Effects of couple-stresses in linear elasticity. Arch Ration Mech Anal 11(1):415–448MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Park SK, Gao XL (2006) Bernoulli-Euler beam model based on a modified couple stress theory. J Micromech Microeng 16(11):2355–2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pei J, Tian F, Thundat T (2004) Glucose biosensor based on the microcantilever. Anal Chem 76(2):292–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rezazadeh G, Tahmasebi A, Zubstov M (2006) Application of piezoelectric layers in electrostatic MEM actuators: controlling of pull-in voltage. Microsyst Technol 12(12):1163–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shoaib M, Hamid NH, Jan MT, Ali NBZ (2017) Effects of crack faults on the dynamics of piezoelectric cantilever-based MEMS sensor. IEEE Sens J 17:6279–6294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Şimşek M, Aydın M (2017) Size-dependent forced vibration of an imperfect functionally graded (FG) microplate with porosities subjected to a moving load using the modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct 160:408–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tada H, Paris PC, Irwin GR (1973) The stress analysis of cracks. Handbook. Del Research Corporation, HellertownGoogle Scholar
  37. Tadi Beni Y, Jafaria A, Razavi H (2014) Size effect on free transverse vibration of cracked nano-beams using couple stress theory. Int J Eng Trans B Appl 28(2):296Google Scholar
  38. Torabi K, Dastgerdi JN (2012) An analytical method for free vibration analysis of Timoshenko beam theory applied to cracked nanobeams using a nonlocal elasticity model. Thin Solid Films 520(21):6595–6602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang K, Wang B (2015) Timoshenko beam model for the vibration analysis of a cracked nanobeam with surface energy. J Vib Control 21(12):2452–2464MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang KF, Kitamura T, Wang B (2015) Nonlinear pull-in instability and free vibration of micro/nanoscale plates with surface energy—a modified couple stress theory model. Int J Mech Sci 99:288–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang KF, Wang B, Zhang C (2017) Surface energy and thermal stress effect on nonlinear vibration of electrostatically actuated circular micro-/nanoplates based on modified couple stress theory. Acta Mech 228(1):129–140MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang FACM, Chong ACM, Lam DC, Tong P (2002) Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity. Int J Solids Struct 39(10):2731–2743CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Yoon HI, Son IS, Ahn SJ (2007) Free vibration analysis of Euler-Bernoulli beam with double cracks. J Mech Sci Technol 21(3):476–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zand MM, Ahmadian MT (2009) Vibrational analysis of electrostatically actuated microstructures considering nonlinear effects. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14(4):1664–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang YH, Ding G, Shun X, Gu D, Cai B, Lai Z (2007) Preparing of a high speed bistable electromagnetic RF MEMS switch. Sens Actuators A Phys 134(2):532–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical and Energy EngineeringShahid Beheshti University, A.C.TehranIran

Personalised recommendations