Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 3479–3485 | Cite as

Performance evaluation of a curved electrode actuator fabricated without gold/chromium conductive layers

  • Burugupally Sindhu Preetham Email author
  • Jordan A. Mangels
Technical Paper


Curved electrode actuators displace on the order of a biological cell diameter at low actuation voltages, making them a potential candidate for probing and micromanipulation of cells in an underwater, closed microenvironment. Here, a closed microenvironment is formed by bonding a Polydimethylsiloxane-based cap-like structure to the actuator; however, the presence of Au/Cr conductive layers on the actuator reduce the available silicon surface area of the actuator—resulting in poor adhesion. Therefore, we propose to fabricate the actuators without these conductive layers. In this paper, we demonstrate the absence of these layers has a minimal effect on the actuator’s peak-to-peak displacement and force. The actuator achieves the following performance metrics: large displacement (1–10 μm) and force (1–21.5 μN) range; broad frequency range (1–500 Hz); and low actuation voltages (0–8 V) in viscous media that are necessary for cell probing and micromanipulation applications.



The authors would like to thank David Hoelzle at The Ohio State University for granting access to research facilities to conduct experiments shown in this work. This work was supported in part by University of Notre Dame Walther Cancer Foundation IITP Fellowship, Wichita State, Notre Dame, and Ohio State capitalization funds. Technical consultation was given by the Notre Dame Nanofabrication and Ohio State Nanotech West Facilities.


  1. Antoniolli F, Maggiolino S, Scuor N, Gallina P, Sbaizero O (2014) A novel MEMS device for the multidirectional mechanical stimulation of single cells: Preliminary results. Mech Mach Theory 78:131–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell DJ, Lu TJ, Fleck NA, Spearing SM (2005) MEMS actuators and sensors: observations on their performance and selection for purpose. J Micromech Microeng 15(7):S153–S164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gajasinghe RWRL, Senveli SU, Rawal S, Williams A, Zheng A, Datar RH, Cote RJ, Tigli O (2014) Experimental study of PDMS bonding to various substrates for monolithic microfluidic applications. J Micromech Microeng 24(7):075010.
  4. Hoelzle DJ, Chan CK, Scott MB, Lake MA, Rowat AC (2015) A large displacement, high frequency, underwater microelectromechanical systems actuator. J Appl Phys 117(1):014503. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hopcroft MA, Nix WD, Kenny TW (2010) What is the Young's Modulus of Silicon? J Microelectromech Syst 19(2):229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Legtenberg R, Gilbert J, Senturia SD, Elwenspoek M (1997) Electrostatic curved electrode actuators. J Microelectromech Syst 6(3):257–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Li J, Brenner MP, Christen T, Kotilainen MS, Lang JH, Slocum AH (2005) Deep-reactive ion-etched compliant starting zone electrostatic zipping actuators. J Microelectromech Syst 14(6):1283–1297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McDonald JC, Whitesides GM (2002) Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices. Acc Chem Res 35(7):491–499. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mukundan V, Pruitt BL (2009) MEMS Electrostatic Actuation in Conducting Biological Media. J Microelectromech Syst 18(2):405–413. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mukundan V, Nelson WJ, Pruitt BL (2013) Microactuator device for integrated measurement of epithelium mechanics. Biomed Microdevices 15(1):117–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mukundan V, Ponce P, Butterfield HE, Pruitt BL (2009) Modeling and characterization of electrostatic comb-drive actuators in conducting liquid media. J Micromech Microeng 19(6):1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Osterberg PM, Senturia SD (1997) M-TEST: A test chip for MEMS material property measurement using electrostatically actuated test structures. J Microelectromech Syst 6(2):107–118. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Preetham BS, Lake MA, Hoelzle DJ (2017) Evaluation of curved electrode electrostatic actuator dynamics in viscous dielectric media for bioMEMS applications. Napa Microsystems Workshop 2017Google Scholar
  14. Preetham BS, Lake MA, Hoelzle DJ (2017) A curved electrode electrostatic actuator designed for large displacement and force in an underwater environment. J Micromech Microeng 27(9):095009. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rowat A, Hoelzle D, Chan C (2014) Mechanical phenotyping of single cells: high throughput quantitative detection and sorting.  WO Patent App. PCT/US2013/068,571Google Scholar
  16. Scuor N, Gallina P, Panchawagh HV, Mahajan RL, Sbaizero O, Sergo V (2006) Design of a novel MEMS platform for the biaxial stimulation of living cells. Biomed Microdevices 8(3):239–246. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shao CY, Kawai Y, Esashi M, Ono T (2010) Electrostatic actuator probe with curved electrodes for time-of-flight scanning force microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum 81(8):083702. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sounart TL, Michalske TA, Zavadil KR (2005) Frequency-dependent electrostatic actuation in microfluidic MEMS. J Microelectromech Syst 14(1):125–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringWichita State UniversityWichitaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations