Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 2159–2168 | Cite as

Wafer-level vacuum package of two-dimensional micro-scanner

  • Hoang Manh ChuEmail author
  • Takashi Sasaki
  • Kazuhiro HaneEmail author
Technical Paper


We present wafer-level vacuum package of two-dimensional (2-D) micro-scanner based on glass-silicon anodic bonding. To form the sacrificial gap for evacuating air in the package cavity before hermetically sealed, the reflow process of Au/Sn/Cr posts due to low-melting temperature of Sn metal is introduced. Structures in Pyrex glass wafers are patterned using wet etching in the 49% HF solution. The 2-D micro-scanner is fabricated by the SOI-based micromachining technology. The resonant frequencies of 2-D micro-scanner after packaged in vacuum are 30 kHz and 290 Hz for the inner mirror and the gimbal frame respectively. The rotation angle of packaged 2-D micro-scanner is 25° at driving voltages of 20 and 17 V for the inner mirror and the gimbal frame respectively. The pressure in the package is estimated in terms of measuring the quality factor of packaged 2-D micro-scanner. The effect of packaging on the performance of the 2-D micro-scanner such as squeeze film air damping caused by the optical window and the substrate is also analyzed in this paper.



The devices were fabricated in Micro/Nano-Machining Research and Education Center, Tohoku University. This work is supported by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (Grant no. K122-2134).


  1. Bao M, Yang H, Yin H, Sun Y (2002) Energy transfer model for squeeze-film air damping in low vacuum. J Micromech Microeng 12:341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christian RG (1996) The theory of oscillating-vane vacuum gauges. Vacuum 16:175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chu HM, Hane K (2011) Design fabrication and vacuum operation characteristics of two-dimensional comb-drive micro-scanner. Sens Actuators A 165:422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu HM, Tokuda T, Kimata M, Hane K (2010) Compact low-voltage operation micro-mirror based on high vacuum seal technology using metal can. J Microelectromech Syst 19:927–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chu HM, Mizuno J, Takagi T, Hane K (2011) Compact slanted comb two-axis micro-mirror scanner fabricated by silicon-on-insulator micromachining. J Vac Sci Technol B 29:042001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu HM, Ngoc HV, Hane K (2014) Vacuum package using anodic bonding assisted by the reflow of low-melting temperature metal. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15(4):695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Esashi M (2008) Wafer level packaging of MEMS. J Micromech Microeng 18:073001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foulgoc BL, Bourouina T, Traon OL, Bosseboeuf A, Marty F, Breluzeau C, Grandchamp JP, Masson S (2006) Highly decoupled single-crystal silicon resonators: an approach for the intrinsic quality factor. J Micromech Microeng 16:160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Henmi H, Shoji S, Shoji Y, Yoshimi K, Esashi M (1994) Vacuum packaging for microsensors by glass-silicon anodic bonding. Sens Actuators A 43:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofmann U, Janes J, Quenzer HJ (2012) High-Q MEMS resonators for laser beam scanning displays. Micromachines 3:509–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kadar Z, Kindt W, Bossche A, Mollinger J (1996) Quality factor of torsional resonators in the low-pressure region. Sens Actuators A 55:299–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li B, Wu H, Zhu C, Liu J (1999) The theoretical analysis on damping characteristics of resonant microbeam in vacuum. Sens Actuators A 77:191–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin MJ, Houston BH, Baldwin JW, Zalalutdinov MK (2008) Damping models for microcantilevers, bridges, and torsional resonators in the free-molecular-flow regime. J Microelectromech Syst 17:503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Minikes A, Bucher I, Avivi G (2006) Damping of a micro-resonator torsion mirror in rarefied gas ambient. J Micromech Microeng 15:1762–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oehrlein GS, Zhang Y, Vender D, Haverlag M (1994) Fluorocarbon high-density plasmas. I. Fluorocarbon film deposition and etching using CF4 and CHF3. J Vac Sci Technol A 12:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pandey AK, Pratap R (2008) A semi-analytical model for squeeze-film damping including rarefaction in a MEMS torsion mirror with complex geometry. J Micromech Microeng 18:105003–105014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rahman MS, Chitteboyina MM, Butler DP, Butler ZÇ, Pacheco SP, McBean RV (2010) Device-level vacuum packaging for RF MEMS. J Microelectromech Syst 19:911–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roylance LM, Angell JB (1979) A batch-fabricated silicon accelerometer. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 26(12):1911–1917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sparks D, Ansari SM, Najafi N (2005) Long-term evaluation of hermetically glass frit sealed silicon to Pyrex wafers with feedthroughs. J Micromech Microeng 15:1560–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tachibana H, Kawano K, Ueda H, Noge H (2009) Vacuum wafer level packaged two-dimensional optical scanner by anodic bonding. In: Proceedings of the MEMS, pp 959–962Google Scholar
  21. Tanaka S, Honjoya Y, Esashi M (2010) AuSn solder vacuum packaging using melted solder floodgates and laser-activated non-evaporable getters for SiC diaphragm anticorrosive vacuum sensors. In: Proceedings of the MEMS, pp 492–495Google Scholar
  22. Veijola T, Kuisma H, Lahdenpera J (1998) The influence of gas–surface interaction on gas-film damping in a silicon accelerometer. Sens Actuators A 66:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NanomechanicsTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.International Training Institute for Materials ScienceHanoi University of Science and TechnologyHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations