Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 47–54 | Cite as

Silicon micromachining in 25 wt% TMAH without and with surfactant concentrations ranging from ppb to ppm

Technical Paper

Abstract

Tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) is one of the most commonly used anisotropic etchants in silicon wet bulk micromachining. It has outstanding etching characteristics such as compatibility with semiconductor processes and provides high etch selectivity between silicon and silicon dioxide. In this work, we have investigated the effect of surfactant concentration ranging from 20 ppb to 1000 ppm on the etching characteristics of 25 wt% TMAH for bulk micromachining of Si{100} and Si{110}. Triton X-100 with formula C14H22O(C2H4O)n, where n = 9–10, is used as surfactant. The major objective of this work is to determine the surfactant concentration at which the etch rate, etched surface morphology and convex corner undercutting are significantly affected. Undercutting length and etched depth are measured using 3D scanning optical microscope. Surface morphology of etched silicon samples are inspected using scanning electron microscope. The surfactant concentration below 100 ppb does not affect etching characteristics significantly, while the effect of surfactant concentration above 100 ppb is substantial on the undercutting at convex corners on Si{100} surface, etch rate and etched surface roughness of Si{110}. The etch rate and etched surface morphology of Si{100} are not influenced considerably when the surfactant is added into 25 wt% TMAH.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by research grant from the Department of Science and Technology (Project No. SR/S3/MERC/072/2011) and the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR, Ref: 03(1320)/14/EMR-II), New Delhi, India.

References

  1. Baum T, Schiffrin DJ (1997) AFM study of surface finish improvement by ultrasound in the anisotropic etching of Si{100} in KOH for micromachining applications. J Micromech Microeng 4:338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen PH, Peng HY, Hsieh CM, Chyu MK (2001) The characteristic behavior of TMAH water solution for anisotropic etching on both silicon substrate and SiO2 layer. Sens Actuators, A 93:132–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Q, Fang J, Ji H-F, Varahramyan K (2007) Fabrication of SiO2 microcantilever using isotropic etching with ICP. IEEE Sens J 7:1632–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng D, Gosalvez MA, Hori T, Sato K, Shikida M (2006) Improvement in smoothness of anisotropically etched silicon surfaces: effects of surfactant and TMAH concentrations. Sens Actuators, A 125:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dutta S, Imran Md, Kumar P, Pal R, Datta P, Chatterjee R (2011) Comparison of etch characteristics of KOH, TMAH and EDP for bulk micromachining of silicon (110). Microsyst Technol 17:1621–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gosalvez MA, Tang B, Pal P, Sato K, Kimura Y, Ishibashi K (2009) Orientation and concentration dependent surfactant adsorption on silicon in aqueous alkaline solutions: explaining the changes in the etch rate, roughness and undercutting for MEMS applications. J Micromech Microeng 19(12):125011 (18 pp)Google Scholar
  7. Gosalvez MA, Pal P, Tang B, Sato K (2010) Atomistic mechanism for the macroscopic effects induced by small additions of surfactants to alkaline etching solutions. Sens Actuators, A 157:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gosalvez MA, Pal P, Ferrando N, Hida H, Sato K (2011) Experimental procurement of the complete 3D etch rate distribution of Si in anisotropic etchants based on vertically micromachined wagon wheel samples. J Micromech Microeng 21:125007 (14 pp)Google Scholar
  9. Jeon JS, Raghavan S, Sperline RP (1995) Behavior of polyethylene oxide based nonionic surfactants in silicon processing using alkaline solutions. J Electrochem Soc 142:621–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pal P, Sato K (2010) Fabrication methods based on wet etching process for the realization of silicon MEMS structures with new shapes. Microsyst Technol 16:1165–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pal P, Sato K (2015) A comprehensive review on convex and concave corners in silicon bulk micromachining based on anisotropic wet chemical etching. Micro Nano Syst Lett 3:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pal P, Singh SS (2013) A simple and robust model to explain convex corner undercutting in wet bulk micromachining. Micro Nano Syst Lett 1:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pal P, Sato K, Gosalvez MA, Shikida M (2007a) Study of rounded concave and sharp edge convex corners undercutting in CMOS compatible anisotropic etchants. J Micromech Microeng 17:2299–2307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pal P, Sato K, Chandra S (2007b) Fabrication techniques of convex corners in a (100)-silicon wafer using bulk micromachining: a review. J Micromech Microeng 17:R1–R23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pal P, Sato K, Shikida M, Gosalvez MA (2009a) Study of corner compensating structures and fabrication of various shapes of MEMS structures in pure and surfactant added TMAH. Sens Actuators, A 154(2):192–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pal P, Sato K, Gosalvez MA, Kimura Y, Ishibashi K, Niwano M, Hida H, Tang B, Itoh S (2009b) Surfactant adsorption on single crystal silicon surfaces in TMAH solution: orientation-dependent adsorption detected by in situ infra-red spectroscopy. J Microelectromech Syst 18:1345–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pal P, Gosalvez MA, Sato K (2010) Silicon micromachining based on surfactant-added tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide: etching mechanism and advanced application. Jpn J Appl Phys 49:056702 (9 pages)Google Scholar
  18. Pal P, Sato K, Gosalvez MA (2012) Etched profile control in anisotropic etching of silicon by TMAH + Triton. J Micromech Microeng 22(6):065013 (9 pp)Google Scholar
  19. Pal P, Ashok A, Haldar S, Xing Y, Sato K (2015) Anisotropic etching in low concentration KOH: effects of surfactant concentration. Micro Nano Lett 10(4):224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paria S, Khilar KC (2004) A review on experimental studies of surfactant adsorption at the hydrophilic solid-water interface. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 110:75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peng L, Xinxin L, Guomin Z, Jian L, Yuelin W, Min L, Dazhong J (2006) Silicon dioxide microcantilever with piezoresistive element integrated for portable ultraresoluble gaseous detection. Appl Phys Lett 89: 074104 (3 pp)Google Scholar
  22. Resnik D, Vrtacnik D, Aljancic U, Mozek M, Amon S (2005) The role of Triton surfactant in anisotropic etching of 110 reflective planes on (100) silicon. J Micromech Microeng 15:1174–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rola KP, Zubel I (2013) Triton surfactant as an additive to KOH silicon etchant. J Microelectromech Syst 22:1373–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rola KP, Ptasinski K, Zakrzewski A, Zubel I (2014) Silicon 45º micromirrors fabricated by etching in alkaline solutions with organic additives. Microsyst Technol 20:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarro PM, Brida D, van der Vlist W, Brida S (2000) Effect of surfactant on surface quality of silicon microstructures etched in saturated TMAHW solutions. Sens Actuators A 85:340–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seidel H, Csepregi L, Heuberger A, Baumgartel H (1990) Anisotropic etching of crystalline silicon in alkaline solutions I: orientation dependence and behavior of passivation layers. J Electrochem Soc 137:3612–3626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sekimura M (1999) Anisotropic etching of surfactant-added TMAH solution. In: Proc. 12th IEEE Micro-Electro-Mech. Syst. Conf., Orlando, Florida, pp 650–655Google Scholar
  28. Shikida M, Sato K, Tokoro K, Uchikawa D (2000) Difference in anisotropic etching properties of KOH and TMAH solutions. Sens Actuators, A 80:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smiljanic MM, Jovic V, Lazic Z (2012) Maskless convex corner compensation technique on a (100) silicon substrate in a 25 wt% TMAH water solution. J Micromech Microeng 22:115011 (11 pp)Google Scholar
  30. Tabata O, Asahi R, Funabashi H, Shimaoka K, Sugiyama S (1992) Anisotropic etching of silicon in TMAH solutions. Sens Actuators, A 34:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tanaka H, Umeki N, Sato K (2013) Perfect adsorption of ppb-level surfactant in 5% KOH water solution on a silicon surface changing anisotropic etching properties. In: 17th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers & Eurosensors XXVII, Barcelona, Spain, 16–20 June 2013) pp 1978–1981Google Scholar
  32. Tang Y, Ji Fang, Yan X, Ji H-F (2004) Fabrication and characterization of SiO2 microcantilever for microsensor application. Sens Actuators, B 97:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tang B, Pal P, Gosalvez MA, Shikida M, Sato K, Amakawa H, Itoh S (2009) Ellipsometry study of the adsorbed surfactant thickness on Si{110} and Si{100} and the effect of pre-adsorbed surfactant layer on etching characteristics in TMAH. Sens Actuators, A 156:334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tang B, Sato K, Zhang D, Cheng Y (2014) Fast Si (100) etching with a smooth surface near the boiling temperature in surfactant-modified tetramethylammonium hydroxide solutions. Micro Nano Lett 9(9):582–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu YW, Michael A, Kwok CY (2011) Formation of ultra-smooth 45º micromirror on (100) silicon with low concentration TMAH and surfactant: techniques for enlarging the truly 45º portion. Sens Actuators, A 166:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang CR, Yang CH, Chen PY (2005) Study on anisotropic silicon etching characteristics in various surfactant-added tetramethylammonium hydroxide water solutions. J Micromech Microeng 15:2028–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zubel I, Kramkowska M (2001) The effect of isopropyl alcohol on etching rate and roughness of (100) Si surface etched in KOH and TMAH solutions. Sens Actuators, A 93:138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zubel I, Kramkowska M, Rola K (2012) Silicon anisotropic etching in TMAH solutions containing alcohol and surfactant additives. Sens Actuators, A 178:126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MEMS and Micro/Nano Systems Laboratory, Department of PhysicsIndian Institute of Technology HyderabadHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations