Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 2003–2010 | Cite as

Fabrication and characterization of bionic amphiphobic functional surface on X70 pipeline steel

Technical Paper


The amphiphobic surface has extremely broad application prospects in industrial production and daily life, such as preventing the adhering and fouling of materials and prolonging service life. In order to prepare an amphiphobic surface on X70 pipeline steel, a simple method was presented. The rough surface was created by shot blasting and chemical etching, consisting of micro-nano composite structures. The surface was then chemically modified by a low surface energy material, which contains a fluorocarbon group. The surface morphology, roughness, chemical composition, and wettability with distilled water and peanut oil were studied by field emission scanning electron microscopy, confocal microscopy, energy dispersive spectrometer, and contact angle measurement instruments. The results indicated that a micro-nano composite structure was created on the steel surface after shot blasting and chemical etching. The amphiphilic surface with micro-nano structure turned into an oleophobic and superhydrophobic surface after being chemically modified by low surface energy material. The maximum contact angles of the amphiphobic surface with distilled water and peanut oil were up to 150 ± 1° and 140 ± 1°, respectively.



The authors acknowledge the financial support of “the National Science Foundation of China (No. 51075184)”, “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (14CX06060A, 14CX02132A and 14CX02128A), and “the Graduate Innovation Project of China University of Petroleum” (NO. YCX2014044).


  1. Bagherifard S, Guagliano M (2012) Fatigue behavior of a low-alloy steel with nanostructured surface obtained by severe shot peening. Eng Fract Mech 81:56–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaudhary A, Barshilia HC (2011) Nanometric multiscale rough CuO/Cu(OH)2 superhydrophobic surfaces prepared by a facile one-step solution-immersion process: transition to superhydrophilicity with oxygen plasma treatment. J Phys Chem C 115:18213–18220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng Q, Li M, Zheng Y et al (2011) Janus interface materials: superhydrophobic air/solid interface and superoleophobic water/solid interface inspired by a lotus leaf. Soft Matter 7:5948–5951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ganesh VA, Dinachali SS, Nair AS et al (2013) Robust superamphiphobic film from electrospun TiO2 nanostructures. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:1527–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao XF, Jiang L (2004) Water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature 432:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilman JJ, Johnston WG, Sears GW (1958) Dislocation etch pit formation in lithium fluoride. J Appl Phys 29(5):747–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee HJ, Willis CR, Stone CA (2011) Modeling and preparation of a super-oleophobic non-woven fabric. J Mater Sci 46:3907–3913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nishino T, Meguro M, Nakamae K et al (1999) The lowest surface free energy based on –CF3 alignment. Langmuir 15(13):4321–4323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pan S, Kota AK, Mabry JM et al (2013) Superomniphobic surfaces for effective chemical shielding. J Am Chem Soc 135:578–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Yu S, Wang X, Wang W et al (2013) A new method for preparing bionic multi scale superhydrophobic functional surface on X70 pipeline steel. Appl Surf Sci 271:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Steele A, Bayer I, Loth E (2009) Inherently superoleophobic nanocomposite coatings by spray atomization. Am Chem Soc 9(1):501–505Google Scholar
  13. Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma ML et al (2007) Designing superoleophobic surfaces. Science 318(5856):1618–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu W, Wang X, Wang D et al (2009) Alumina nanowire forests via unconventional anodization and super-repellency plus low adhesion to diverse liquids. Chem Commun 4:1043–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang SA, Ju J, Qiu YC, He YX, Wang XL, Dou SX, Liu KS, Jiang L (2013) Peanut leaf inspired multifunctional surfaces. Small 1:1–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Electronic EngineeringChina University of PetroleumQingdaoPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations