Room temperature Si–Ti thermopile THz sensor
In this paper, we present the conception, fabrication and characterization of a thermopile designed to detect terahertz electromagnetic fields at room temperature. The thermopile is made of four doped silicon/titanium thermocouples. The absorber consists of a metallic grid made of titanium, deposited at the same time as the metal part of the thermocouples. The design of the grid is based on a theoretical multilayer model using equivalent resistivity and taking into account small diffraction effects. The grid is deposited on a 2.4 mm × 2.4 mm silicon nitride square membrane. The time constant of the sensor is measured at 0.3 THz to be 10 ms, which is consistent with finite elements simulations. The responsivity is evaluated at 4.8 μV/(W m−2). Due to a large impedance, which leads to a large Johnson noise, the noise equivalent power is 1.5 × 10−6 W Hz−1/2.
This work was supported by the French National Agency (ANR) through the Project TERASCOPE No. ANR-06-BLAN-0073-02.
- Briand D, Teyssieux D, Courbat J, Thiery L, Cretin B, de Rooij N (2008) On the thermal simulation and characterisation of microsystems: progress and status. Eurosensors XXII, Dresden, vol 1, pp 133–136Google Scholar
- Thiery L, Briand D, Odaymat A, de Rooij N (2004) Contribution of scanning probe temperature measurements to the thermal analysis of micro-hotplates. Therminic 2004. Sophia Antipolis, France, pp 23–28Google Scholar
- Thiery L, Toullier S, Teyssieux D, Briand D (2008) Thermal contact calibration between a thermocouple probe and a microhotplate. J Heat Transfer 130(9):091,601Google Scholar
- Thiery L, Gavignet E, Cretin B (2009) Two omega method for active thermocouple microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum 80(3):034,901.Google Scholar
- Tonouchi M (2009) Galore new applications of terahertz science and technology. Terahertz Sci Technol 2(3):90–101Google Scholar
- Yu C, Fan S, Sun Y, Pickwell-MacPherson E (2012) The potential of terahertz imaging for cancer diagnosis a review of investigations to date. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2:33–45Google Scholar