Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 415–421

Quality control for deep x-ray lithography (LIGA): a preliminary metrology study

  • Pascal Meyer
  • James D. Claverley
  • Richard K. Leach
Technical Paper

Abstract

The x-ray lithography process is time-consuming and costly. The use of process design rules is essential along with CAD designs that should fulfil the specifications of dimension and roughness. Parameters such as the material of mask membrane, the technique to produce the mask, the resist used (poly (methyl-methacrylate) [PMMA], epoxy based photoresist SU-8), the synchrotron power and synchrotron spectrum do have an effect on the final geometry of the fabricated parts. To evaluate these parts, high accuracy metrology is essential. KIT/IMT and NPL have two different co-ordinate measuring machines (CMMs) designed for millimetre scale geometry measurements to micrometer accuracy. Test structures of various sized holes and columns, made by deep x-ray lithography in PMMA and electroformed in metal, have been measured by these two different CMMs. A comparison of the measurements taken from these two micro-CMMs will be presented and discussed. The outcome of these preliminary results on the x-ray lithography process will be shortly described.

References

  1. Bos EJC (2008) Tactile 3D probing system for measuring MEMS with nanometer uncertainty. Dissertation, Technical University EindhovenGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosse H, Koenders L, Härtig F, Buhr E, Wilkening G (2010) Nano and micrometrology at PTB: state of the art and future challenges. Optolectron Instr Data Proc 46(4):312–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Griffiths SK (2004) Fundamental limitations of LIGA x-ray lithography: sidewall offset, slope and minimum feature size. J Micromech Microeng 14:999–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ISO 10360-2 (2009) Co-ordinate Metrology—Part 2: performance assessment of co-ordinate measuring machines. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  5. ISO 12181-2 (2003) Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—roundness—Part 1: vocabulary and parameters of roundness. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  6. Maisonobe L (2007) Finding the circle that best fits a set of points. Available from: http://www.spaceroots.org/. Accessed 10 Feb 2011
  7. Meyer P, Mäder O, Saile V, Schulz J (2009) Comparison of measurement methods for microsystem components: application to microstructures made by the deep x-ray lithography process (x-ray LIGA). Meas Sci Technol. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/20/8/084024 Google Scholar
  8. Momose A (2005) Recent advances in X-ray phase imaging. Jpn J Appl Phys 44(9A):6355–6367Google Scholar
  9. Saile V, Wallrabe U, Tabata O, Korvink JG (eds) (2009) Advanced micro and nanosystems. In: LIGA and its Applications, vol. 7. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. doi:10.1002/9783527622573

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pascal Meyer
    • 1
  • James D. Claverley
    • 2
  • Richard K. Leach
    • 2
  1. 1.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Campus North, Institute of Microstructure Technology (IMT) Hermann-von-Helmholtz-PlatzEggenstein-LeopoldshafenGermany
  2. 2.National Physical Laboratory (NPL)TeddingtonUK

Personalised recommendations