Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 209–223 | Cite as

Optimal design of multi-channel microreactor for uniform residence time distribution

  • Cyril Renault
  • Stéphane ColinEmail author
  • Stéphane Orieux
  • Patrick Cognet
  • Théo Tzédakis
Techincal Paper


Multi-channel microreactors can be used for various applications that require chemical or electrochemical reactions in either liquid, gaseous or multi phase. For an optimal control of the chemical reactions, one key parameter for the design of such microreactors is the residence time distribution of the fluid, which should be as uniform as possible in the series of microchannels that make up the core of the reactor. Based on simplifying assumptions, an analytical model is proposed for optimizing the design of the collecting and distributing channels which supply the series of rectangular microchannels of the reactor, in the case of liquid flows. The accuracy of this analytical approach is discussed after comparison with CFD simulations and hybrid analytical-CFD calculations that allow an improved refinement of the meshing in the most complex zones of the flow. The analytical model is then extended to the case of microchannels with other cross-sections (trapezoidal or circular segment) and to gaseous flows, in the continuum and slip flow regimes. In the latter case, the model is based on second-order slip flow boundary conditions, and takes into account the compressibility as well as the rarefaction of the gas flow.


Knudsen Number Residence Time Distribution Optimal Angle Electro Discharge Machine Rectangular Microchannels 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aubert C, Colin S (2001) High-order boundary conditions for gaseous flows in rectangular microchannels. Microscale Thermophys Eng 5(1):41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahrami M, Michael Yovanovich M, Richard Culham J (2007) A novel solution for pressure drop in singly connected microchannels of arbitrary cross-section. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50(13–14):2492–2502zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Y, Cheng P (2002) Heat transfer and pressure drop in fractal tree-like microchannel nets. Int J Heat Mass Transf 45(13):2643–2648MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cho ES, Choi JW, Yoon JS, Kim MS (2010) Modeling and simulation on the mass flow distribution in microchannel heat sinks with non-uniform heat flux conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53(7–8):1341zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colin S (2005) Rarefaction and compressibility effects on steady and transient gas flows in microchannels. Microfluid Nanofluid 1(3):268–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colin S, Lalonde P, Caen R (2004) Validation of a second-order slip flow model in rectangular microchannels. Heat Transf Eng 25(3):23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Commenge JM, Falk L, Corriou J-P, Matlosz M (2005) Analysis of microstructured reactor characteristics for process miniaturization and intensification. Chem Eng Technol 28(4):446–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Commenge JM, Falk L, Corriou JP, Matlosz M (2002) Optimal design for flow uniformity in microchannel reactors. AIChE J 48(2):345–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deissler RG (1964) An analysis of second-order slip flow and temperature-jump boundary conditions for rarefied gases. Int J Heat Mass Transf 7:681–694zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delsman ER, Pierik A, de Croon MHJM, Kramer GJ, Schouten JC (2004) MicrochanneI plate geometry optimization for even flow distribution at high flow rates. Chem Eng Res Des 82(A2):267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gravesen P, Branebjerg J, Jensen OS (1993) Microfluidics—a review. J Micromech Microeng 3(4):168–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jang J-Y, Cheng C-H, Huang Y-X (2010) Optimization of channel width distribution of a gas flow field by integrating computational fluid dynamics code with a simplified conjugate-gradient method. Energy Fuel 24(1):570–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kandlikar SG, Garimella S, Li D, Colin S, King MR (2006) Heat transfer and fluid flow in minichannels and microchannels. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Koura K, Matsumoto H (1991) Variable soft sphere molecular model for inverse-power-law or Lennard-Jones potential. Phys Fluids A 3(10):2459–2465zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Löwe H, Ehrfeld W (1999) State of the art in microreaction technology: concepts manufacturing and applications. Electrochim Acta 44(21–22):3679–3689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Madou MJ (2002) MEMS fabrication. In: Gad-el-Hak M (ed) The MEMS Handbook. CRC Press, New York, pp 16.11–16.183Google Scholar
  17. Morini GL (2004) Single-phase convective heat transfer in microchannels: a review of experimental results. Int J Therm Sci 43(7):631–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morini GL, Spiga M, Tartarini P (2004) The rarefaction effect on the friction factor of gas flow in microchannels. Superlattices Microstruct 35(3–6):587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peterson RB (1999) Numerical modelling of conduction effects in microscale counterflow heat exchangers. Microscale Thermophys Eng 3(1):17–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pitakarnnop J, Varoutis S, Valougeorgis D, Geoffroy S, Baldas L, Colin S (2010) A novel experimental setup for gas microflows. Microfluid Nanofluid 8(1):57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saber M, Commenge J-M, Falk L (2009) Rapid design of channel multi-scale networks with minimum flow maldistribution. Chem Eng Process 48(3):723–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saber M, Commenge JM, Falk L (2010) Microreactor numbering-up in multi-scale networks for industrial-scale applications: impact of flow maldistribution on the reactor performances. Chem Eng Sci 65:372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shah RK, London AL (1978) Laminar flow forced convection in ducts. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Shoji S, Esashi M (1994) Microflow devices and systems. J Micromech Microeng 4(4):157–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vlachos DG (1998) Stochastic modelling of chemical microreactors with detailed kinetics - induction times and ignitions of H-2 in air. Chem Eng Sci 53(1):157–168MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ziogas A, Kolb G, O’Connell M, Attour A, Lapicque F, Matlosz M, Rode S (2009) Electrochemical microstructured reactors: design and application in organic synthesis. J Appl Electrochem 39(12):2297–2313CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cyril Renault
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Stéphane Colin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stéphane Orieux
    • 1
  • Patrick Cognet
    • 2
    • 3
  • Théo Tzédakis
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Université de Toulouse; INSA, UPS, Mines Albi, ISAE; ICA (Institut Clément Ader)ToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Laboratoire de Génie ChimiqueUniversité de Toulouse; INPT, UPSToulouseFrance
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Génie ChimiqueCNRSToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations