Advertisement

Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 417–423 | Cite as

Multi frequency interrogation of polypyrrole based gas sensors for organic vapors

  • Chintan M. Bhatt
  • Nagaraju JampanaEmail author
Technical Paper

Abstract

Polypyrrole exhibits reversible changes in their direct current resistance on exposure to organic volatiles. However, one needs to employ an array of such sensors to discriminate organic volatiles present in a mixture. Hence, polypyrrole based gas sensor is designed for the detection and discrimination of different organic volatiles. Multi frequency impedance measurement technique is used to detect the organic vapors, such as acetone, ethanol and Isopropyl alcohol, in the gas phase, over a frequency range 10 Hz to 2 MHz. The sensor response is monitored by measuring the changes in its capacitance, resistance and the dissipation factor upon exposure to organic volatiles. It is observed that the capacitive property of the sensor is more sensitive to these volatiles than its resistive property. Each volatile responds to the sensor in terms of dissipation factor at specific frequency and found that the peak magnitude has a linear relationship with their concentrations.

Keywords

Odour Polypyrrole Dissipation Factor Capacitive Property Multi Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Centre of Excellence in Nanoelectronics (CEN) at IISc., to carry out the above investigations.

References

  1. Amrani MEH, Payne PA, Persaud KC (1995) Multi-frequency measurements of organic conducting polymers for sensing of gases and vapours. In: The 8th international conference on solid-state sensors and actuators and eurosensor IX, Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  2. Arafeh LMM (1992) Investigation of multi-element gas sensing systems. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester (UMIST)Google Scholar
  3. Archer WI, Armstrong RD (1980) The application of a.c. impedance methods to solid electrolytes. Chem. Soc. Specialist Periodical Reports, chap 3, vol 7Google Scholar
  4. Barratt RS (1981) The preparation of standard gas mixtures. Analyst 106:817–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhatt Chintan M, Nagaraju J (2010) Studies on electrical properties of wheat bread as a function of moisture content during storage. J Sens Instrumen Food Qual 4:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buus RG (1970) Physical design of electronic systems. In: Everitt WL (ed) Design technology, vol I. NJ Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, chap 9, pp 327–380Google Scholar
  7. Josse F, Lukas R, Zhou R, Schneider S, Everhart D (1996) AC-impedance-based chemical sensors for organic solvent vapors. Sens Actuators B 35–36:363–369Google Scholar
  8. Heilig A, Barsan N, Weimar U, Schweizer-Berberich M, GÖpel W (1997) Gas identification by modulating temperatures of SnO2, based thick film sensors. Sens Actuators B 43:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holdcraft S, Lionel Funt B (1988) Preparation and electrocatalytic properties of conducting films of polypyrrole containing platinum microparticulates. J Electroanal Chem 240(1–2):89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hwang JH, Mason TO, Buehler MF, Datab JG, Matson DW, Linehan JC (1995) Characterization of humidity-sensing NiONi(OH) 2 nanocoreposites by impedance spectroscopy. Mater Sci Eng A 204:252–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Katz M (1997) Methods of air sampling and analysis, 2nd edn. American Riblic Health Association, Byrd Pre-Press, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  12. Macdonald R (1987) Impedance spectroscopy emphasizing solid materials and systems, chap 1–2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Magan N, Evans P (2000) Volatiles as an indicator of fungal activity and differentiation between species and the potential use of electronic nose technology for early detection of grain spoilage. J Stored Prod Res 36:319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Musio F, Amrani MEH, Persand KC (1995) High-frequency a.c. investigation of conducting polymer gas sensors. Sens Actuators B 23:223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakamoto Ide IT, Moriizumi T (1993) Development of odour-sensing system using an auto-sampling stage. Sens Actuators B Chem 13:351–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nakamoto T, Yosihioka M, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi K, Moriizumi T, Ueyama S, Yerazunis WS (2006) Colorimetric method for odor discrimination using dye-coated plate and multiLED sensor. Sens Actuators B 116:202–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Payne PA, Persaud KC, Amrani MEH (1996) Novel techniques for interrogating conducting polymer gas sensors. In: 6th international meeting on chemical sensors, GaithershurgGoogle Scholar
  18. Shimada E, Tachibana K (1995) An interpretation on conductivity propagation in polyaniline based on impedance analysis. J Electrochem Soc 142:4078–4082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Valentine FHH, North AA (1980) Odour control: a concise guide. Warren Spring Laboratory, Department of Industry, UK, pp 17–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Instrumentation and Applied PhysicsIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations