Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 165–173

Design of high stroke electrostatic micropumps: a charge control approach with ring electrodes

  • Emanuele Bertarelli
  • Alberto Corigliano
  • Andreas Greiner
  • Jan G. Korvink
Technical Paper

Abstract

A novel design strategy to avoid pull-in occurrence in electrostatic micro electro mechanical systems is proposed. It combines charge control with ring electrodes, on a circular geometry. This idea is introduced here for the design of efficient and reliable high stroke electrostatic diaphragm micropumps, while it has a broad potential applicability. A minimal lumped one degree-of-freedom model is derived and used to introduce and demonstrate the proposed approach for a circular plate geometry. Finite element models are subsequently adopted for a more detailed device modelling. As expected, charge control exhibits a stabilizing effect with respect to voltage drive, but not sufficient to achieve a full-range stability for the considered geometry. When the electrode area is properly defined, stability range can be extended up to gap closure in the central part of the membrane. In this configuration, the increase in voltage required for full-range device drive would be relevant, while in charge control the penalty is considerably lower. Finally, loading conditions and geometrical parameters for an optimized actuation are suggested.

References

  1. Ardito R, Bertarelli E, Contro R, Corigliano A (2010a) Static and dynamic analyses of actuation devices in electrostatic micro-pumps. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on engineering computational technology (Valencia), paper 121Google Scholar
  2. Ardito R, Corigliano A, Frangi A (2010b) Multiscale finite element models for predicting spontaneous adhesion in MEMS. Mec Ind 11:177–182Google Scholar
  3. Batra RC, Spinello D, Porfiri M (2007) Pull-in instability in electrostatically actuated MEMS due to Coulomb and Casimir forces. In: Advances in multiphysics simulation and experimental testing of MEMS. Imperial College Press, London, pp 329–374Google Scholar
  4. Batra RC, Porfiri M, Spinello D (2008) Reduced order models for microelectromechanical rectangular and circular plates incorporating the Casimir force. Int J Solids Struct 45:3558–3583MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertarelli E, Ardito R, Corigliano A, Contro R (2011) A plate model for the evaluation of pull-in instablity occurrence in electrostatic micropump diapragms. Int J Appl Mech 3:1–19Google Scholar
  6. Bochobza-Degani O, Elata D, Nemirovsky Y (2003) A general relation between the ranges of stability of electrostatic actuators under charge or voltage control. Appl Phys Lett 82:302–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castagñer L, Senturia SD (1999) Speed-energy optimization of electrostatic actuators based on pull-in. J Microelectromech Syst 8:290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan EK, Dutton RW (2000) Electrostatic micromechanical actuator with extended range of travel. J Microelectromech Syst 9:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Français O, Dufour I (2000) Enhancement of elementary displaced volume with electrostatically actuated diaphragms: application to electrostatic micropumps. J Micromech Microeng 10:282–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hung ES, Senturia SD (1999) Extending the travel range of analog-tuned electrostatic actuators. J Microelectromech Syst 8:497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iverson BD, Garimella SV (2008) Recent advances in microscale pumping technologies: a review and evaluation. Microfluid Nanofluid 5:145–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Korvink JG, Paul O (2006) MEMS: A practical guide to design, analysis, and applications. William Andrew Publishing, Norwich; Springer-Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  13. Laser DJ, Santiago JD (2004) A review of micropumps. J Micromech Microeng 14:R35–R64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nabian A, Rezazadeh G, Haddad-Derafshi M, Tahmasebi A (2008) Mechanical behaviour of a circular micro plate subjected to uniform hydrostatic and non-uniform electrostatic pressure. Microsyst Technol 14:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nadal-Guardia R, Dehé A, Aigner R, Castagñer L (2002) Current drive methods to extend the range of travel of electrostatic microactuators beyond the voltage pull-in point. J Microelectromech Syst 11:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pelesko JA, Triolo AA (2001) Nonlocal problems in MEMS device control. J Eng Math 41:345–366MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Seeger JI, Boser BE (1999) Dynamics and control of parallel-plate actuators beyond the electrostatic instability. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on solid-state sensors and actuators (Sendai), pp 474–477Google Scholar
  18. Seeger JI, Boser BE (2003) Charge control of parallel-plate, electrostatic actuators and the tip-in instability. J Microelectromech Syst 12:656–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seeger JI, Crary SB (1997a) Stabilization of electrostatically actuated mechanical devices. In: Proceedings of the international conference on solid-state sensors and actuators (Chicago), pp 1133–1136Google Scholar
  20. Seeger JI, Crary SB (1997b) Analysis and simulation of MOS capacitor feedback for stabilizing electrostatically actuated mechanical devices. In: Simulation and design of microsystems and microstructures: 2nd conference proceedings. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 199–208Google Scholar
  21. Timoshenko SP, Woinowsky-Krieger S (1959) Theory of plates and shells, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Truong T-Q, Nguyen N-T (2004) A polymeric piezoelectric micropump based on lamination technology. J Micromech Microeng 14:632–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wibbeler J, Pfeifer G, Hietschold M (1998) Parasitic charging of dielectric surfaces in capacitive microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). Sensor Actuat A 71:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wickramasinghe IPM, Maithripala DHS, Kawade BD, Berg JM, Dayawansa WP (2009) Passivity-based stabilization of a 1-DOF electrostatic MEMS model with a parasitic capacitance. IEEE T Contr Syst T 17:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Woias P (2005) Micropumps—past, progress and future prospects. Sensor Actuat B 105:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zengerle R, Richter A, Sandmaier H (1992) A micro membrane pump with electrostatic actuation. In: Proceedings of micro electro mechanical systems (Travemünde), pp 19–24Google Scholar
  27. Zhang W-M, Meng G, Chen D (2007) Stability, nonlinearity and reliability of electrostatically actuated MEMS devices. Sensors 7:760–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao YP, Wang LS, Yu TX (2003) Mechanics of adhesion in MEMS—a review. J Adhes Sci Technol 17:519–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emanuele Bertarelli
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alberto Corigliano
    • 1
  • Andreas Greiner
    • 2
  • Jan G. Korvink
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Structural EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Laboratory for Simulation, Department of Microsystems EngineeringUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  3. 3.School of Soft Matter Research, Freiburg Institute of Advanced StudiesUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations