Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 16, Issue 8–9, pp 1457–1463 | Cite as

The effect of the aspect ratio on the hydrophobicity of microstructured polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) robust surfaces

Technical Paper

Abstract

In this study, we have designed and fabricated robust hydrophobic surfaces that are composed of various micropillar arrays and investigated the effect of the aspect ratio (feature height/feature size) of the micropillar on the wettability of the fabricated surfaces. The robust, micropillar-arrayed surfaces were designed to yield the same Wenzel and Cassie water contact angles (CAs). According to our design rule, one can achieve an enhanced hydrophobic surface by increasing the height of the micropillars. The designed hydrophobic surfaces were fabricated by polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) replica molding with photolithographically micropatterned SU-8 masters. The hydrophobicity properties of the fabricated PDMS surfaces were fully characterized theoretically and experimentally. From the theoretical and experimental results, it was found that the micropillars of an intrinsically hydrophobic material with a high aspect ratio enhance the hydrophobicity of the surface by increasing the surface roughness (in view of the Wenzel state) and the opportunities for the entrapment of air beneath a water droplet (the Cassie state).

References

  1. Barbieri L, Wagner E, Hoffmann P (2007) Water wetting transition parameters of perfluorinated substrates with periodically distributed flat-top microscale obstacles. Langmuir 23:1723–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cassie ABC, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. He B, Patankar NA, Lee J (2003) Multiple equilibrium droplet shapes and design criterion for rough hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 19:4999–5003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kim DS, Lee BK, Yeo J, Choi MJ, Yang W, Kwon TH (2009) Fabrication of PDMS micro/nano hybrid surface for increasing hydrophobicity. Microelecton Eng 86:1375–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee SM, Lee HS, Kim DS, Kwon TH (2006) Fabrication of hydrophobic films replicated from plant leaves in nature. Surf Coat Technol 201:553–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee SM, Jung ID, Ko JS (2008) The effect of the surface wettability of nanoprotrusions formed on network-type microstructures. J Micromech Microeng 18:125007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McHale G (2007) Cassie and Wenzel: were they really so wrong? Langmuir 23:8200–8205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Roach P, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI (2008) Progess in superhydrophobic surface development. Soft Matter 4:224–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M, Mabry JM, Mazzella SA, Rutledge GC, McKinley GH, Cohen RE (2008) Designing superoleophobic surfaces. Science 318:1618–1622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem 28:988–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Yeo J, Choi MJ, Kim DS (2010) Robust hydrophobic surfaces with various micropillar arrays. J Micromech Microeng 20:025028CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringChung-Ang UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations