Microsystem Technologies

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 731–737

Analysis and design of a wide micro beam as a pressure gauge for high sensitivity MEMS fingerprint sensors

Technical Paper

Abstract

Sensitivity improvement is a challenging issue in miniature pressure sensors. To improve sensitivity and linearity of the device, a wide micro beam structure has been proposed to gauge capacitance changes caused by the applied pressure in a capacitive MEMS fingerprint sensor. Bending behavior of the device and the effect of the protrusion geometry on partial loading of the micro beam has been analytically investigated. Based on the idea of efficient loading of the wide micro beam, an improved design for the capacitive fingerprint sensor is developed to increase sensitivity. It is shown with FEM simulations that the micro wide beam design is superior to the common membrane based MEMS fingerprint sensors in terms of sensitivity and linearity.

References

  1. Charlot B, Parrain F, Galy N, Basrour S, Courtois B (2004) A sweeping mode integrated fingerprint sensor with 256 tactile microbeams. J Microelectromech Syst 13:636–644. doi:10.1109/JMEMS.2004.832195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fojimori T, Hanaoka Y, Fujisaki K, Yokoyama N, Fukuda H (2005) Fully CMOS compatible on-LSI capacitive pressure sensor fabricated using standard back-end-of- line processes. Proc 13th int conf on solid-state sensors, actuators and microsystems Seoul, Korea 37–40. doi:10.1109/SENSOR.2005.1496353
  3. Ganji BA, Majlis BY (2006) The effect of design parameters on static and dynamic behaviors of the MEMS microphone. Proc semiconductor electronics ICSE ‘06 IEEE int conf on 35–40. doi:10.1109/SMELEC.2006.381015
  4. International Biometric Group (2007) Biometrics market and industry report 2007–2012. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Knapp AG (2004) Pressure type fingerprint sensor fabrication method. US patent 6,759,264B2 5,325,442Google Scholar
  6. Meleshko VV (2003) Selected topics in the history of the two-dimensional biharmonic problem. Appl Mech Rev 56:33–85. doi:10.1115/1.1521166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nabipoor M, Majlis BY (2004) A passive telemetry LC pressure sensor optimized for TPMS. Proc semiconductor electronics ICSE’04 IEEE int conf on 345–349. doi:10.1109/SMELEC.2004.1620902
  8. NEXUS (2005) The NEXUS MST/MEMS market analysis III 2005–2009. European Microsystems Network, NeuchâtelGoogle Scholar
  9. Sato N, Machida K, Morimura H, Shigematsu S, Kudou K, Yano M, Kyuragi H (2003) MEMS fingerprint sensor immune to various finger surface conditions. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 50:1109–1116. doi:10.1109/TED.2003.812490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sato N, Shigematsu S, Morimura H, Yano M, Kudou K, Kamei T, Machida K (2004) Highly sensitive CMOS MEMS fingerprint sensor. Tech Dig Sens Symp 21:99–102Google Scholar
  11. Sato N, Shigematsu S, Morimura H, Yano M, Kudou K, Kamei T, Machida K (2005) Novel surface structure and its fabrication process for MEMS fingerprint sensor. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 52:1026–1032. doi:10.1109/TED.2005.846342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Souza RJD, Wise KD (1997) A very high density bulk micromachined capacitive tactile imager. Int Conf Solid State Sens Actuators Chic 2:1473–1476. doi:10.1109/SENSOR.1997.635743 Google Scholar
  13. Takao H, Miyasaka M, Kawai H, Hara H, Miyazaki A, Kodaira T, Tam SWB, Inoue S, Shimoda T (2004) Flexible semiconductor devices: fingerprint sensor and electrophoretic display on plastic. Proc 34th European solid-state device research conf, ESSDERC 2004 309–312. doi:10.1109/ESSDER.2004.1356551
  14. Timoshenko SP, Krieger SW (1984) Theory of plates and shells. McGraw-Hill, ISBN: 0-07-Y85820-9Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Microengineering and NanoelectronicsUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations