Advertisement

Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 58–66 | Cite as

Evaluating the psychometric properties of two-item and four-item short forms of the Japanese Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study

  • Tomonori AdachiEmail author
  • Kiyoka Enomoto
  • Keiko Yamada
  • Daisuke Inoue
  • Miho Nakanishi
  • Noriyo Takahashi
  • Tomohiko Nishigami
  • Masahiko Shibata
Original Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire is a valid measure assessing self-efficacy in individuals with chronic pain. Short-form versions of the measure have been developed to decrease the assessment burden. However, few studies have evaluated the psychometric properties of the short forms in languages other than English. The aim of this study was to evaluate two 2-item short forms and one 4-item short form of the Japanese Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in terms of internal consistency, criterion validity, structural validity, and construct validity.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study. Data from 150 individuals with mixed chronic pain at a pain management center in a university hospital were extracted from clinical records and analyzed. The data included the information of the original version and short forms of the Japanese Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and other pain-related measures assessing pain intensity, pain interference, anxiety, depression and pain catastrophizing.

Results

Item statistics supported the item selection for each of the three short forms. All the short forms demonstrated adequate internal consistency and criterion validity. With respect to construct validity, one of the 2-item short forms failed to meet the criterion regarding the change in the magnitude of correlation with a depression scale. The 4-item short form met all the criteria including structural validity.

Conclusion

The study findings provide evidence for the reliability and validity of 2- and 4-item versions of the Japanese Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for use in clinical and research settings.

Keywords

Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire Self-efficacy Chronic pain Short form 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Michael Nicholas for granting us permission to develop and evaluate the PSEQ-J short forms and also to Professor Mark P Jensen for his detailed comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest related to the present study.

Supplementary material

540_2018_2583_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (74 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 74 KB)
540_2018_2583_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (73 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 73 KB)
540_2018_2583_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (80 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 79 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Linton SJ, Shaw WS. Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Phys Ther. 2011;91:700–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pincus T, McCracken LM. Psychological factors and treatment opportunities in low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27:625–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandura A. Social foundations of action and thought: a social cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jackson T, Wang Y, Wang Y, Fan H. Self-efficacy and chronic pain outcomes: A meta-analytic review. J Pain. 2014;15:800–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costa LdCM, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Hancock MJ, Smeets RJ. Self-efficacy is more important than fear of movement in mediating the relationship between pain and disability in chronic low back pain. Eur J Pain. 2011;15:213–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee H, Hübscher M, Moseley GL, Kamper SJ, Traeger AC, Mansell G, McAuley JH. How does pain lead to disability? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies in people with back and neck pain. Pain. 2015;156:988–97.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11:153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferrari S, Chiarotto A, Pellizzer M, Vanti C, Monticone M. Pain self-efficacy and fear of movement are similarly associated with pain intensity and disability in italian patients with chronic low back pain. Pain Pract. 2016;16:1040–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Associations between psychosocial factors and pain intensity, physical functioning, and psychological functioning in patients with chronic pain: a cross-cultural comparison. Clin J Pain. 2014;30:713–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fordham B, Ji C, Hansen Z, Lall R, Lamb SE. Explaining how cognitive behavioral approaches work for low back pain: mediation analysis of the back skills training trial. Spine. 2017;42:1031–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miles CL, Pincus T, Carnes D, Taylor SJ, Underwood M. Measuring pain self-efficacy. Clin J Pain. 2011;27:461–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adachi T, Nakae A, Maruo T, Shi K, Shibata M, Maeda L, Saitoh Y, Sasaki J. Validation of the Japanese version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Japanese patients with chronic pain. Pain Med. 2014;15:1405–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rasmussen MU, Rydahl-Hansen S, Amris K, Danneskiold Samsøe B, Mortensen EL. The adaptation of a Danish version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: reliability and construct validity in a population of patients with fibromyalgia in Denmark. Scan J Caring Sci. 2016;30:202–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Maas LC, de Vet HC, Köke A, Bosscher RJ, Peters ML. Psychometric properties of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). Eur J Psychol Assess. 2012;28:68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chiarotto A, Vanti C, Cedraschi C, Ferrari S, Ostelo RW, Pillastrini P. Responsiveness and minimal important change of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and short forms in patients with chronic low back pain. J Pain. 2016;17:707–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bot AG, Nota SP, Ring D. The creation of an abbreviated version of the PSEQ: The PSEQ-2. Psychosomatics. 2014;55:381–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Briet JP, Bot AG, Hageman MG, Menendez ME, Mudgal CS, Ring DC. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: validation of an abbreviated two-item questionnaire. Psychosomatics. 2014;55:578–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nicholas MK, McGuire BE, Asghari A. A 2-item short form of the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire: development and psychometric evaluation of PSEQ-2. J Pain. 2015;16:153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McWilliams LA, Kowal J, Wilson KG. Development and evaluation of short forms of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire. Eur J Pain. 2015;19:1342–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J. IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Treede R-D, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, Cohen M, Evers S, Finnerup NB, First MB. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015;156:1003.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1993;55:195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain. 1999;83:157–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamashiro K, Arimura T, Iwaki R, Jensen MP, Kubo C, Hosoi M. A multidimensional measure of pain interference: reliability and validity of the pain disability assessment scale. Clin J Pain. 2011;27:338–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kitamura T. Hospital anxiety depression scale. Arch Psychatr Diagn Clin Eval. 1993;4:371–2.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kugaya A, Akechi T, Okuyama T, Okamura H, Uchitomi Y. Screening for psychological distress in Japanese cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28:333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iwaki R, Arimura T, Jensen MP, Nakamura T, Yamashiro K, Makino S, Obata T, Sudo N, Kubo C, Hosoi M. Global catastrophizing vs catastrophizing subdomains: assessment and associations with patient functioning. Pain Med. 2012;13:677–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:524–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage publications; 2009.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford publications; 2011.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, De Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual life Res. 2010;19:539–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R core team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Muthén L, Muthén B. Mplus User’s Guide, 8th Edn. Los Angeles: 1998–2017.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Björling EA. The momentary relationship between stress and headaches in adolescent girls. Headache. 2009;49:1186–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Björling EA, Singh N. Exploring temporal patterns of stress in adolescent girls with headache. Stress Health. 2017;33:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McCracken LM, Dhingra L. A short version of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS-20): preliminary development and validity. Pain Res Manag. 2002;7:45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pain Management ClinicShiga University of Medical Science HospitalOtsuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceChiyodaJapan
  4. 4.Center for Pain ManagementOsaka University Medical HospitalSuitaJapan
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyMcGill UniversityQuébecCanada
  6. 6.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineJuntendo University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  7. 7.Public Health, Department of Social MedicineOsaka University Graduate School of MedicineSuitaJapan
  8. 8.Department of Occupational TherapyOsaka College of RehabilitationOsakaJapan
  9. 9.Department of AnesthesiologyShiga University of Medical ScienceOtsuJapan
  10. 10.Tokuyukai Senriyama HospitalToyonakaJapan
  11. 11.Department of Physical TherapyKonan Woman’s UniversityKobeJapan
  12. 12.Department of Health ScienceNaragakuen UniversityNaraJapan

Personalised recommendations