Advertisement

Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 745–754 | Cite as

The comparison of adductor canal block with femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis

  • Xing-qi Zhao
  • Nan Jiang
  • Fei-fei Yuan
  • Lei Wang
  • Bin YuEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Although several studies have compared the clinical efficacy of an adductor canal block (ACB) to that of a femoral nerve block (FNB) for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), disputes mainly exist in the recovery of quadriceps strength and mobilization ability between the two methods. The aim of the present study was to compare, in a systematic review and meta-analysis, the clinical efficacy of ACB with that of FNB.

Methods

We systematically searched randomized controlled trials comparing FNB with ACB for analgesia after TKA in Pubmed and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 30th 2015. There was no limitation of publication language. Trial quality was assessed using the modified Jadad scale, and eligible data were pooled for meta-analysis.

Results

Five studies of 348 patients were included. Outcomes showed that patients who received ACB had similar or better recovery of quadriceps strength and mobilization ability than those that underwent FNB. Similar efficacy was found between the two strategies regarding adductor strength, pain scores [at rest (p = 0.86), at or after knee flexion (p = 0.31)], opioid consumption (p = 0.99), opioid-associated adverse effects (p = 0.60), length of hospital stay (p = 0.42), patient satisfaction (p = 0.57), and success rate of blockade (p = 0.20).

Conclusions

The present study suggests that TKA patients who receive ACB can achieve similar or even better recovery of quadriceps strength and mobilization ability than those treated with FNB. Taken as a whole, ACB may be a better analgesia strategy after TKA at present.

Keywords

Femoral adductor canal block Femoral nerve block Analgesia Total knee arthroplasty Systematic review Meta-analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Allen P. Liang for revising this manuscript. The authors are also grateful for the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81272052, 81572165).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that they, or any members of their immediate families, have no funding or commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

References

  1. 1.
    Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991–2010. JAMA. 2012;308:1227–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersen LO, Gaarn-Larsen L, Kristensen BB, Husted H, Otte KS, Kehlet H. Subacute pain and function after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:508–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hebl JR, Kopp SL, Ali MH, Horlocker TT, Dilger JA, Lennon RL, Williams BA, Hanssen AD, Pagnano MW. A comprehensive anesthesia protocol that emphasizes peripheral nerve blockade for total knee and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(Suppl 2):63–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen HW, Liu SS, Ware PD, Nairn CS, Owens BD. Peripheral nerve blocks improve analgesia after total knee replacement surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:93–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paul JE, Arya A, Hurlburt L, Cheng J, Thabane L, Tidy A, Murthy Y. Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1144–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bauer M, Wang L, Onibonoje OK, Parrett C, Sessler DI, Mounir-Soliman L, Zaky S, Krebs V, Buller LT, Donohue MC, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Ilfeld BM. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: decreasing local anesthetic concentration to minimize quadriceps femoris weakness. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:665–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charous MT, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, Mariano ER, Donohue MC, Dutton PH, Ferguson EJ, Ilfeld BM. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: varying local anesthetic delivery method (bolus versus basal) to minimize quadriceps motor block while maintaining sensory block. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:774–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ilfeld BM, Duke KB, Donohue MC. The association between lower extremity continuous peripheral nerve blocks and patient falls after knee and hip arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1552–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Xu D, Salviz EA. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:321–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:409–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Sorensen AM, Dahl JB. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery: preliminary results. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:14–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:357–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaeger P, Grevstad U, Henningsen MH, Gottschau B, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor-canal-blockade on established, severe post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:1013–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Memtsoudis SG, Yoo D, Stundner O, Danninger T, Ma Y, Poultsides L, Kim D, Chisholm M, Jules-Elysee K, Valle AGD, Sculco TP. Subsartorial adductor canal vs femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2015;39:673–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:3–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang W, Hu Y, Tao Y, Liu X, Wang G. Ultrasound-guided continuous adductor canal block for analgesia after total knee replacement. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127:4077–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shah NA, Jain NP. Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:2224–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim DH, Lin Y, Goytizolo EA, Kahn RL, Maalouf DB, Manohar A, Patt ML, Goon AK, Lee YY, Ma Y, Yadeau JT. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:540–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jæger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, Hilsted KL, Bjerregaard J, Gyrn J, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38:526–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oremus M, Wolfson C, Perrault A, Demers L, Momoli F, Moride Y. Interrater reliability of the modified Jadad quality scale for systematic reviews of Alzheimer’s disease drug trials. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2001;12:232–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xing-qi Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nan Jiang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fei-fei Yuan
    • 3
  • Lei Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bin Yu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bone and Cartilage Regenerative MedicineNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of NeonateShanxi Children’s Hospital, Shanxi Medical UniversityTaiyuanChina

Personalised recommendations