Personal hand gel for improved hand hygiene compliance on the regional anesthesia team
- 436 Downloads
Hand hygiene reduces healthcare-associated infections, and several recent publications have examined hand hygiene in the perioperative period. Our institution’s policy is to perform hand hygiene before and after patient contact. However, observation suggests poor compliance. This is a retrospective review of a quality improvement database showing the effect of personal gel dispensers on perioperative hand hygiene compliance on a regional anesthesia team.
Healthcare providers assigned to the Acute Pain Service were observed for compliance with hand hygiene policy during a quality improvement initiative. Provider type and compliance were prospectively recorded in a database. Team members were then given a personal gel dispensing device and again observed for compliance. We have retrospectively reviewed this database to determine the effects of this intervention.
Of the 307 encounters observed, 146 were prior to implementing personal gel dispensers. Compliance was 34 %. Pre- and post-patient contact compliances were 23 and 43 %, respectively. For 161 encounters after individual gel dispensers were provided, compliance was 63 %. Pre- and post-patient contact compliances were 53 and 72 %, respectively. Improvement in overall compliance from 34 to 63 % was significant.
On the Acute Pain Service, compliance with hand hygiene policy improves when individual sanitation gel dispensing devices are worn on the person.
KeywordsHand hygiene Quality improvement Nerve block Anesthesia conduction Sanitation
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
All funding was from institutional sources. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 1.Magill SS, Edwars JR, Bamberg W, Beldavs ZG, Dumyati G, Kainer MA, Lynfield R, Maloney M, McAllister-Hollod L, Nadle J, Ray SM, Thompson DL, Wilson LE, Fridkin SK. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1198–208.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.American Society of Anesthesiologists. Recommendations for infection control for the practice of anesthesiology (third edition): Committee on Occupational Health. https://www.asahq.org/resources/resources-from-asa-committees. Accessed Jul 2015.
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR. 2002;51:1–44.Google Scholar
- 4.World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. World Health Organization Health System Policies and Operations Evidence and Information for Policy 2009. http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/tools/9789241597906/en/. Accessed Jul 2015.
- 16.Giannitsioti E, Athanasia S, Antoniadou A, Fytrou H, Athanassiou K, Bourvani P, Kanellakopoulou K, Kouvelas K, Papadopoulos A, Plachouras D, Giamarellou H. Does a bed rail system of alcohol-based handrub antiseptic improve compliance of health care workers with hand hygiene? Results from a pilot study. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:160–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Erasmus V, Brouwer W, van Beeck EF, Oenema A, Daha TJ, Richardus H, Vos MC, Brug J. A qualitative exploration of reasons for poor hand hygiene among hospital workers: lack of positive role models and of convincing evidence that hand hygiene prevents cross-infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:415–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar