Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 467–470 | Cite as

Improvement of teamwork and safety climate following implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist at a university hospital in Japan

  • Takashi Kawano
  • Miki Taniwaki
  • Kimiyo Ogata
  • Miwa Sakamoto
  • Masataka Yokoyama
Short Communication

Abstract

With the aim to optimize surgical safety, the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSCL) in 2008. The SSCL has been piloted in many countries worldwide and shown to improve both safety attitudes within surgical teams and patient outcomes. In the study reported here we investigated whether implementation of the SSCL improved the teamwork and safety climate at a single university hospital in Japan. All surgical teams at the hospital implemented the SSCL in all surgical procedures with strict adherence to the SSCL implementation manual developed by WHO. Changes in safety attitudes were evaluated using the modified operating-room version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). A before and after design was used, with the questionnaire administered before and 3 months after SSCL implementation. Our analysis revealed that the mean scores on the SAQ had significantly improved 3 months after implementation of the SSCL compared to those before implementation. This finding implies that effective implementation of the SSCL could improve patient outcomes in Japan, similar to the findings of the WHO pilot study.

Keywords

Surgical safety World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist Operating room 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson O, Davis R, Hanna GB, Vincent CA. Surgical adverse events: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2013;206:253–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, Herbosa T, Joseph S, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MC, Merry AF, Moorthy K, Reznick RK, Taylor B, Gawande AA, Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:491–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla RM, den Outer AJ, van Andel G, van Helden SH, Schlack WS, van Putten MA, Gouma DJ, Dijkgraaf MG, Smorenburg SM, Boermeester MA, SURPASS Collaborative Group. Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1928–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bliss LA, Ross-Richardson CB, Sanzari LJ, Shapiro DS, Lukianoff AE, Bernstein BA, Ellner SJ. Thirty-day outcomes support implementation of a surgical safety checklist. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:766–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Dziekan G, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Gawande AA, Safe Surgery Saves Lives Investigators and Study Group. Effect of a 19-item surgical safety checklist during urgent operations in a global patient population. Ann Surg. 2010;251:976–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conley DM, Singer SJ, Edmondson L, Berry WR, Gawande AA. Effective surgical safety checklist implementation. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:873–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, Dziekan G, Herbosa T, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MC, Merry AF, Reznick RK, Taylor B, Vats A, Gawande AA, Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:102–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sexton JB, Makary MA, Tersigni AR, Pryor D, Hendrich A, Thomas EJ, Holzmueller CG, Knight AP, Wu Y, Pronovost PJ. Teamwork in the operating room: frontline perspectives among hospitals and operating room personnel. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:877–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brock D, Abu-Rish E, Chiu CR, Hammer D, Wilson S, Vorvick L, Blondon K, Schaad D, Liner D, Zierler B. Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:414–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lingard L, Espin S, Whyte S, Regehr G, Baker GR, Reznick R, Bohnen J, Orser B, Doran D, Grober E. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:330–4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J, Roberts PR, Thomas EJ. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:44.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takashi Kawano
    • 1
  • Miki Taniwaki
    • 2
  • Kimiyo Ogata
    • 2
  • Miwa Sakamoto
    • 2
    • 3
  • Masataka Yokoyama
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineKochi Medical SchoolOko-cho, NankokuJapan
  2. 2.Nursing DepartmentKochi Medical School Hospital Oko-cho, NankokuJapan
  3. 3.Medical Safety Managing CenterKochi Medical School HospitalOko-cho, NankokuJapan

Personalised recommendations