Protein sparing during general anesthesia with a propofol solution containing medium-chain triglycerides for gastrectomy: comparison with sevoflurane anesthesia
- 229 Downloads
Despite the importance of the inhibition of catabolic response to surgery, the effects of different anesthetic techniques on the catabolic response in surgical patients are controversial. This study compared the endocrine-metabolic responses and protein catabolism during gastrectomy in patients who received either sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia with remifentanil.
Thirty-seven patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I–III) aged 20–79 years undergoing elective gastrectomy were randomly assigned to receive sevoflurane anesthesia with remifentanil (n = 19) or intravenous propofol anesthesia (Propofol-Lipuro® 1 %; B. Braun, Melshungen AG, Germany) with remifentanil (n = 18). Urine samples were collected every 1 h after skin incision (0 h) and the urinary 3-methylhistidine:creatinine ratio (3-MH/Cr ratio) was used as a marker of protein catabolism. Respiratory quotient was measured during a 1 h period following skin incision.
The 3-MH/Cr ratio significantly increased at 1–2 and 2–3 h compared to 0 and 0–1 h in both groups, but the propofol group exhibited a lower 3-MH/Cr ratio (nmol/μmol) than the sevoflurane group at 1–2 h (15.7 vs. 18.2, P = 0.012) and 2–3 h (15.9 vs. 18.1, P = 0.025). A difference was observed in the respiratory quotient between the sevoflurane and propofol groups (0.726 vs. 0.707, P = 0.003).
A lower 3-MH/Cr ratio and a lower respiratory quotient during propofol anesthesia, compared to those exhibited during sevoflurane anesthesia, suggest that protein sparing probably occurs through the utilization of medium-chain triglycerides contained in the fat emulsion of propofol solution as a fuel source.
KeywordsFat emulsion Free fatty acid 3-Methylhistidine Protein metabolism
We thank Ms. Saya Sonoda for technical assistance with measurements of urinary metabolites, and Dr. Kazuhiko Fukatsu and Dr. Atsunori Nakao for critical comments and valuable suggestions. This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Researchers, Hyogo College of Medicine, 2009.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
- 3.Schricker T, Lattermann R, Schreiber M, Geisser W, Georgieff M, Radermacher P. The hyperglycaemic response to surgery: pathophysiology, clinical implications and modifications by the anaesthetic techniques. Clin Int Care. 1998;9:118–28.Google Scholar
- 19.Sawada A, Yoshikawa Y, Yamauchi M, Watanabe A, Yamakage M. Efficacy of glucose infusion for the inhibition of breakdown of fat tissue and muscle protein under remifentanil anesthesia (in Japanese with English abstract). Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol). 2012;61:358–63.Google Scholar