Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 412–422

Controversies in obstetric anesthesia

Invited Review Article

Abstract

Obstetric anesthesia has become a widely evidence-based practice, with an increasing number of specialized anesthesiologists and a permanent research production. We believe that with the review of commonly discussed and controversial points the reader will be able to incorporate an evidence-based practice into their routine and offer to parturients and their babies a safe, reliable and consistent anesthesia care.

Keywords

Anesthesia Obstetric Epidural Spinal Labor Cesarean 

References

  1. 1.
    Simpson WG. The works of Sir JY Simpson, Vol II: Anaesthesia. Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black; 1871. p. 199–200.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yoshioka T, Yeo S, Fetters MD. Experiences with epidural anesthesia of Japanese women who had childbirth in the United States. J Anesth. 2012;26:326–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Sakala C, Declercq ER, Corry MP. Listening to Mothers: the first national U.S. survey of women’s childbearing experiences. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31:633–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hingson RA, Edwards WB. Continuous caudal analgesia: an analysis of the first ten thousand confinements thus managed with the report of the author’s first thousand cases. JAMA. 1943;123:538–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caton D. The secularization of pain. Anesthesiology. 1985;62:493–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thorp JA, Eckert LO, Ang MS, Johnston DA, Peaceman AM, Parisi VM. Epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia: risk factors in nulliparas. Am J Perinatol. 1991;8:402–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lieberman E, Lang JM, Cohen A, D’Agostino R Jr, Datta S, Frigoletto FD Jr. Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:993–1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM, McNitt J, Meyer BA, Cohen GR, Yeast JD. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:851–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goetzl LM, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics: ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists n. 36. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:177–91.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chestnut DH, McGrath JM, Vincent RD Jr, Penning DH, Choi WW, Bates JN, Mc Farlane C. Does early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are in spontaneous labor? Anesthesiology. 1994;80:1201–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chestnut DH, Vincent RD Jr, McGrath JM, Choi WW, Bates JN. Does early administration of epidural analgesia affect obstetric outcome in nulliparous women who are receiving intravenous oxytocin? Anesthesiology. 1994;80:1193–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Diaz NT, Yaghmour E, Marcus RJ, Sherwani SS, Sproviero MT, Yilmaz M, Patel R, Robles C, Grouper S. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:655–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Obstetric Practice: ACOG Committee Opinion n. 339: analgesia and cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1487–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists. Task Force on Obstetrical Anesthesia: Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:843–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: ACOG Committee Opinion n. 295: Pain relief during labor. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:213.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marucci M, Cinnella G, Perchiazzi G, Brienza N, Fiore T. Patient-requested neuraxial analgesia for labor: impact on rates of cesarean and instrumental vaginal delivery. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:1035–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Sullivan JT, Scavone BM, Gerber SE, Yaghmour EA. Early compared with late neuraxial analgesia in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1066–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang FZ, Shen XF, Guo XR, Peng Y, Gu X. Epidural analgesia in the latent phase of labor and the risk of cesarean delivery: a five-year randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:871–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaminski HM, Stafl A, Aiman J. The effect of epidural analgesia on the frequency of instrumental obstetric delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:770–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chestnut DH. The 2011 FAER-SOAP Gertie Marx Reflections on studies of epidural analgesia and obstetric outcome. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21:168–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chestnut DH, Bates JN, Choi WW. Continuous infusion epidural analgesia with lidocaine: efficacy and influence during the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:323–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chestnut DH, Owen CL, Bates JN, Ostman LG, Choi WW, Geiger MW. Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625 % bupivacaine/0.0002 % fentanyl versus 0.125 % bupivacaine. Anesthesiology. 1988;68:754–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chestnut DH, Vandewalker GE, Owen CL, Bates JN, Choi WW. The influence of continuous epidural bupivacaine analgesia on the second stage of labor and method of delivery in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology. 1987;66:774–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chestnut DH, Laszewski LJ, Pollack KL, Bates JN, Manago NK, Choi WW. Continuous epidural infusion of 0.0625 % buipivacaine-0.0002 % fentanyl during the second stage of labor. Anesthesiology. 1990;72:613–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsen LC, Thue B, Datta S, Segal S. Is combined spinal-epidural analgesia associated with more rapid cervical dilation in nulliparous patients when compared with conventional epidural analgesia? Anesthesiology. 1999;91:920–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharma SK, Alexander JM, Messick G, Bloom SL, McIntire DD, Wiley J, Leveno KJ. Cesarean delivery: a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:546–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hasegawa J, Farina A, Turchi G, Hasegawa Y, Zanello M, Baroncini S. Effects of epidural analgesia on labor length, instrumental delivery, and neonatal short-term outcome. J Anesth. 2012 Sep 11 (in press).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD000331.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thorp JA, Parisi VM, Boylan PC, Johnston DA. The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on cesarean section for dystocia in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:670–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Alexander JM, Sharma SK, McIntire DD, Wiley J, Leveno KJ. Intensity of labor pain and cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:1524–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Impey L, MacQuillan K, Robson M. Epidural analgesia need not increase operative delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:358–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Segal S, Su M, Gilbert P. The effect of a rapid change in availability of epidural analgesia on the cesarean delivery rate: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:974–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hepner DL, Gaiser RR, Cheek TG, Gutsche BB. Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:232–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Simmons SW, Cyna AM, Dennis AT, Hughes D. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD003401.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Collis RE, Davies DW, Aveling W. Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour. Lancet. 1995;345:1413–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Norris MC, Fogel ST, Conway-Long C. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:913–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Segall S, Csavoy AN, Datta S. The tocolytic effect of cathecholamines in the gravid rat uterus. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:864–9.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Clarke VT, Smiley RM, Finster M. Uterine hyperactivity after intrathecal injection of fentanyl for analgesia during labor: a cause of fetal bradycardia? Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1083.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Van de Velde M, Vercauteren M, Vandermeersch E. Fetal heart rate abnormalities after regional analgesia for labor pain: the effect of intrathecal opioids. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:257–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Baraz R, Collis RE. The management of accidental dural puncture during labour epidural analgesia: a survey of UK practice. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:673–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cohen S, Amar D, Pantuck EJ, Singer N, Divon M. Decreased incidence of headache after accidental dural puncture in caesarean delivery patients receiving continuous postoperative intrathecal analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38:716–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ayad S, Demian Y, Narouze SN, Tetzlaff JE. Subarachnoid catheter placement after wet tap for analgesia in labor: influence on the risk of headache in obstetric patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:512–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Russell IF. A prospective controlled study of continuous spinal analgesia versus repeat epidural analgesia after accidental dural puncture in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21:7–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Holmström B, Rawal N, Axelsson K, Nydahl PA. Risk of catheter migration during combined spinal epidural block: percutaneous epiduroscopy study. Anesth Analg. 1995;80:747–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Angle PJ, Kronberg JE, Thompson DE, Duffin J, Faure P, Balasubramaniam S, Szalai JP, Cromwell S. Epidural catheter penetration of human dural tissue: in vitro investigation. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1491–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cork R, Kryc J, Vaughan R. Ultrasonic localization of the lumbar epidural space. Anesthesiology. 1980;52:513–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Arzola C, Davies S, Rofaeel A, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound using the transverse approach to the lumbar spine provides reliable landmarks for labor epidurals. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1188–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Balki M, Lee Y, Halpern S, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in the transverse plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space in obese parturients. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1876–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Whitty R, Moore M, Macarthur A. Identification of the lumbar interspinous spaces: palpation versus ultrasound. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:538–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lee AJ, Ranasinghe JS, Chehade JM, Arheart K, Saltzman BS, Penning DH, Birnbach DJ. Ultrasound assessment of the vertebral level of the intercristal line in pregnancy. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:559–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Grau T, Bartusseck E, Conradi R, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:1047–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vallejo MC, Phelps AL, Singh S, Orebaugh SL, Sah N. Ultrasound decreases the failed labor epidural rate in resident trainees. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19:373–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gambling DR. Lumbar ultrasound: useful gadget or time-consuming gimmick? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:318–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1607–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, Attygalle DE, Shrestha N, Mori R, Nguyen DH, Hoang TB, Rathavy T, Chuyun K, Cheang K, Festin M, Udomprasertgul V, Germar MJ, Yanqiu G, Roy M, Carroli G, Ba-Thike K, Filatova E, Villar J. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet. 2010;375:490–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wong CA, Loffredi M, Ganchiff JN, Zhao J, Wang Z, Avram MJ. Gastric emptying of water in term pregnancy. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1395–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Fitzgerald PC, Raikoff K, Avram MJ. Gastric emptying of water in obese pregnant women at term. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:751–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ewah B, Yau K, King M, Reynolds F, Carson RJ, Morgan B. Effect of epidural opioids on gastric emptying in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1993;2:125–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Dock-Nascimento DB. Reducing preoperative fasting time: a trend based on evidence. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;2:57–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2007;106:843–63.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Smith I, Kranke P, Murat I, Smith A, O’Sullivan G, Søreide E, Spies C, in’t Veld B. Perioperative fasting in adults and children: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28:556–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Itou K, Fukuyama T, Sasabuchi Y, Yasuda H, Suzuki N, Hinenoya H, Kim C, Sanui M, Taniguchi H, Miyao H, Seo N, Takeuchi M, Iwao Y, Sakamoto A, Fujita Y, Suzuki T. Safety and efficacy of oral rehydration therapy until 2 h before surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2012;26:20–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Dubin SA, Jense HG, McCranie JM, Zubar V. Sugarless gum chewing before surgery does not increase gastric fluid volume or acidity. Can J Anaesth. 1994;41:603–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Purkayastha S, Tilney HS, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP. Meta-analysis of randomized studies evaluating chewing gum to enhance postoperative recovery following colectomy. Arch Surg. 2008;143:788–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Abd-El-Maeboud KH, Ibrahim MI, Shalaby DA, Fikry MF. Gum chewing stimulates early return of bowel motility after caesarean section. BJOG. 2009;116:1334–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kafali H, Duvan CI, Gözdemir E, Simavli S, Onaran Y, Keskin E. Influence of gum chewing on postoperative bowel activity after cesarean section. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;69:84–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sullivan SA, Smith T, Chang E, Hulsey T, Vandorsten JP, Soper D. Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:455.e1-5.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Committee opinion no. 465: antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: timing of administration. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:791–2.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Camann W, Tuomala R. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: always before skin incision! Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:1–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Dou L. Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10:CD008726.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Pevzner L, Swank M, Krepel C, Wing DA, Chan K, Edmiston CE Jr. Effects of maternal obesity on tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:877–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Rout CC, Rocke DA, Levin J, Gouws E, Reddy D. A reevaluation of the role of crystalloid preload in the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:262–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ueyama H, He YL, Tanigami H, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I. Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1999;9:1571–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Riley ET, Cohen SE, Rubenstein AJ, Flanagan B. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: six percent hetastarch versus lactated Ringer’s solution. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:838–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Dyer RA, Farina Z, Joubert IA, Du Toit P, Meyer M, Torr G, Wells K, James MF. Crystalloid preload versus rapid crystalloid administration after induction of spinal anaesthesia (coload) for elective caesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004;32:351–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: an effective technique using combination phenylephrine infusion and crystalloid cohydration. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:744–5.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Banerjee A, Stocche RM, Angle P, Halpern SH. Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:24–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Nishikawa K, Yokoyama N, Saito S, Goto F. Comparison of effects of rapid colloid loading before and after spinal anesthesia on maternal hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in cesarean section. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007;21:125–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Carvalho B, Mercier FJ, Riley ET, Brummel C, Cohen SE. Hetastarch co-loading is as effective as pre-loading for the prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:150–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Teoh WH, Sia AT. Colloid preload versus coload for spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery: the effects on maternal cardiac output. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1592–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Siddik-Sayyid SM, Nasr VG, Taha SK, Zbeide RA, Shehade JM, Al Alami AA, Mokadem FH, Abdallah FW, Baraka AS, Aouad MT. A randomized trial comparing colloid preload to coload during spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1219–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    McDonald S, Fernando R, Ashpole K, Columb M. Maternal cardiac output changes after crystalloid or colloid coload following spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:803–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Rout CC, Rocke DA. Prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1994;32:117–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Macarthur A, Riley ET. Obstetric anesthesia controversies: vasopressor choice for postspinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;45:115–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Ngan Kee WD, Tam YH, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Critchley LA, Karmakar MK. Closed-loop feedback computer-controlled infusion of phenylephrine for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a preliminary descriptive study. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:1251–6.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A. Continuous invasive blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring during cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind comparison of low-dose versus high-dose spinal anesthesia with intravenous phenylephrine or placebo infusion. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:856–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Dyer RA, Reed AR, van Dyk D, Arcache MJ, Hodges O, Lombard CJ, Greenwood J, James MF. Hemodynamic effects of ephedrine, phenylephrine, and the coadministration of phenylephrine with oxytocin during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:753–65.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Dyer RA, van Dyk D, Dresner A. The use of uterotonic drugs during caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19:313–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
  91. 91.
  92. 92.
    Balki M, Ronayne M, Davies S, Fallah S, Kingdom J, Windrim R, Carvalho JC. Minimum oxytocin dose requirement after cesarean delivery for labor arrest. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:45–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Carvalho JC, Balki M, Kingdom J, Windrim R. Oxytocin requirements at elective cesarean delivery: a dose-finding study. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1005–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Magalhaes JK, Carvalho JC, Parkes RK, Kingdom J, Li Y, Balki M. Oxytocin pretreatment decreases oxytocin-induced myometrial contractions in pregnant rats in a concentration-dependent but not time-dependent manner. Reprod Sci. 2009;16:501–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Thomas TA, Cooper GM. Maternal deaths from anaesthesia. An extract from why mothers die 1997–1999, the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:499–508.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Lamacraft G. Anaesthesia related deaths. In: Pattinson RC, editor. Saving mothers: fourth report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in South Africa. Department of Health, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa. 2010;137.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Tsen L, Balki M. Oxytocin protocols during cesarean delivery: time to acknowledge the risk/benefit ratio? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010;19:243–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Rydén G, Sjöholm I. Half-life of oxytocin in blood of pregnant and non-pregnant women. Acta Endocrinol. 1969;61:425–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Bergqvist D, Lassen MR, Colwell CW, Ray JG. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004;126(3 Suppl):338S–400S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Sultan P, Gutierrez MC, Carvalho B. Neuraxial morphine and respiratory depression: finding the right balance. Drugs. 2011;71:1807–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D, Alves D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:437–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Palmer CM, Nogami WM, Van Maren G, Alves DM. Postcesarean epidural morphine: a dose-response study. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:887–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Bauchat JR, Higgins N, Wojciechowski KG, McCarthy RJ, Toledo P, Wong CA. Low-dose ketamine with multimodal postcesarean delivery analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011;20:3–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Moore A, Costello J, Wieczorek P, Shah V, Taddio A, Carvalho JC. Gabapentin improves postcesarean delivery pain management: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:167–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    O’Neill P, Duarte F, Ribeiro I, Centeno MJ, Moreira J. Ropivacaine continuous wound infusion versus epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:179–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, Maharaj CH, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:186–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Eslamian L, Jalili Z, Jamal A, Marsoosi V, Movafegh A. Transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. J Anesth. 2012;26:334–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Kanazi GE, Aouad MT, Abdallah FW, Khatib MI, Adham AM, Harfoush DW, Siddik-Sayyid SM. The analgesic efficacy of subarachnoid morphine in comparison with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:475–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Loane H, Preston R, Douglas MJ, Massey S, Papsdorf M, Tyler J. A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21:112–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Mishriky BM, George RB, Habib AS. Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:766–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    McMorrow RCN, Ni Mhuircheartaigh RJ, Ahmed KA, Aslani A, Ng SC, Conrick-Martin I, Dowling JJ, Gaffney A, Loughrey JP, McCaul CL. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal morphine for pain relief after caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:706–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Costello JF, Moore AR, Wieczorek PM, Macarthur AJ, Balki M, Carvalho JC. The transversus abdominis plane block, when used as part of a multimodal regimen inclusive of intrathecal morphine, does not improve analgesia after cesarean delivery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:586–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hospital for Special SurgeryNew York CityUSA
  2. 2.Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of AnesthesiologyBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations