Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 362–368 | Cite as

Effect of jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers on glottic visualization during GlideScope videolaryngoscopy

  • David M. Corda
  • Kevin T. Riutort
  • Alex J. Leone
  • Mueez K. Qureshi
  • Michael G. Heckman
  • Sorin J. BrullEmail author
Original Article



During performance of direct laryngoscopy in the difficult-to-visualize airway, several maneuvers have the potential to impact glottic visualization, including jaw thrust and cricoid pressure. The effect of these maneuvers on glottic visualization during videolaryngoscopy has not been studied. We evaluated the effect of jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers on both visualization of the glottis and the area of glottic opening visible during GlideScope-aided videolaryngoscopy.


One hundred patients were enrolled in this study. After induction of general anesthesia, videolaryngoscopy was followed by jaw thrust and cricoid pressure maneuvers performed in random order. Laryngeal anatomy was recorded continuously and was saved as digital images following the initial laryngoscopy and after each maneuver. Glottis grade [modified Cormack and Lehane (C&L)] was recorded, as was the total glottic area.


There was improvement in glottis grade when utilizing jaw thrust maneuver in comparison to GlideScope videolaryngoscopy alone (31% improved, 4% worsened; P < 0.001). There was no difference in glottis grade when using the cricoid pressure maneuver in comparison with videolaryngoscopy alone (39% improved, 20% worsened; P = 0.19). Glottic opening area, however, was greater when utilizing the jaw thrust maneuver in comparison with videolaryngoscopy alone (P < 0.001), but smaller when utilizing the cricoid pressure maneuver in comparison with videolaryngoscopy alone (P < 0.001).


The jaw thrust maneuver was superior to videolaryngoscopy alone in improving the modified C&L grade and the visualized glottic area; however, no significant improvement was noted with cricoid pressure. We therefore recommend the use of jaw thrust as a first-line maneuver to aid in glottic visualization and tracheal intubation during GlideScope videolaryngoscopy.


Airway management Cricoid pressure maneuver Jaw thrust maneuver GlideScope videolaryngoscopy 


Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39:1105–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yentis SM, Lee DJ. Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:1041–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levitan RM, Kinkle WC, Levin WJ, Everett WW. Laryngeal view during laryngoscopy: a randomized trial comparing cricoid pressure, backward-upward-rightward pressure, and bimanual laryngoscopy. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:548–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takahata O, Kubota M, Mamiya K, Akama Y, Nozaka T, Matsumoto H, Ogawa H. The efficacy of the “BURP” maneuver during a difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:419–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmitt HJ, Mang H. Head and neck elevation beyond the sniffing position improves laryngeal view in cases of difficult direct laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:335–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hsu WT, Hsu SC, Lee YL, Huang JS, Chen CL. Penetrating injury of the soft palate during GlideScope intubation. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1609–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malik AM, Frogel JK. Anterior tonsillar pillar perforation during Glidescope video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1610–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the Glidescope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anesth. 2007;54:54–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chin KJ, Arango MF, Paez AF, Turkstra TP. Palatal injury associated with the GlideScope. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:449–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vincent RD Jr, Wimberly MP, Brockwell RC, Magnuson JS. Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:619–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsu WT, Tsao SL, Chen KY, Chou WK. Penetrating injury of the palatoglossal arch associated with use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope in a flame burn patient. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2008;46(1):39–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pacey JA. Anterior tonsillar pillar perforation during GlideScope videolaryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hirabayashi Y, Otsuka Y. Apparent blind spot with the GlideScope video laryngoscope (Letter). Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:461–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:191–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doyle DJ, Zura A, Ramachandran M. Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway (Letter). Can J Anesth. 2004;51:95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dupanovic M, Diachun CA, Isaacson SA, Layer D. Intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope using the “gear stick technique” (Letter). Can J Anesth. 2006;53:213–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dow WA, Parsons DG. Reverse loading to facilitate Glidescope intubation. Can J Anesth. 2007;54:161–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kramer DC, Osborn IP. More maneuvers to facilitate tracheal intubation with the GlideScope. Can J Anesth. 2006;53:737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dorges V. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:24–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim DW, Kim HS, Kim CS, Kim SD. Glidescope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(4):531–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ochroch EA, Hollander JE, Kush S, Shofer FS, Levitan RM. Assessment of laryngeal view: percentage of glottic opening score vs Cormack and Lehane grading. Can J Anesth. 1999;46:987–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Corda
    • 1
  • Kevin T. Riutort
    • 2
  • Alex J. Leone
    • 3
  • Mueez K. Qureshi
    • 4
  • Michael G. Heckman
    • 1
  • Sorin J. Brull
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Mayo Clinic College of MedicineJacksonvilleUSA
  2. 2.South Denver Anesthesiologists, P.C.EnglewoodUSA
  3. 3.University of Florida College of MedicineGainesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Mayo Clinic Florida Clinical Research Internship Study ProgramJacksonvilleUSA
  5. 5.Mayo Clinic FloridaJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations