Advertisement

Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 375–380 | Cite as

Clinical experience with a new endobrochial blocker: the EZ-blocker

  • Tamás VéghEmail author
  • Marianna Juhász
  • Attila Enyedi
  • István Takács
  • József Kollár
  • Béla FülesdiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

In some thoracic surgical procedures, the insertion of a double-lumen tube (DLT) is not feasible, or the altered use of a DLT and a single-lumen tube (SLT) is justified during the surgery. In the present article we report our experience with a new bronchial blocker, the EZ-blocker, in clinical use.

Methods

Data were obtained from ten patients undergoing thoracic surgery necessitating one-lung ventilation. For lung isolation, a combination of an SLT and an EZ-blocker was used. The time of insertion and positioning of the EZ-blocker, the lung deflation time with the EZ-blocker cuff inflated and deflated, and the cuff’s minimal occlusion volume were recorded. Based on the CT scan, the diameter of the main bronchi and the angle of the bifurcation were measured offline.

Results

The insertion duration of the EZ-blocker was 76 ± 15 s. Two malpositionings were caused by the too-deep positioning of the SLT used for introducing the EZ-blocker, which could be corrected within 65 ± 7 s. The use of the EZ-blocker allowed a short deflation time of the lung without (9.4 ± 0.7 s) and with (4.1 ± 0.7 s) administration of suctioning. The proper block was only dependent on the diameter of the main bronchi and was independent of the bifurcation angle.

Conclusions

Use of the EZ-blocker is easy and safe. The short insertion time and short lung deflation time through the lumen of the SLT allows its use in emergency situations or in cases of a difficult airway.

Keywords

EZ-blocker Endobronchial blocker tube One-lung ventilation Thoracic anesthesia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Daniel I. Sessler, MD, Michael Cudahy Professor and Chair, Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA, and László L. Szegedi, MD, PhD, Professor of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, for their suggestions for this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

References

  1. 1.
    Mungroop HE, Tjong Yoe Wai P, Morei MN, Loef BG, Epema AH. Lung isolation with a new Y-shaped endobronchial blocking device, the EZ-blocker®. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:119–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruetzler K GG, Schmid W, Papp D, Nabecker S, Hutschala D, Lang G, Hager H. Randomized clinical trial comparing double-lumen tube and EZ-blocker for single-lung ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:896–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benumof JL. Difficult tubes and difficult airways. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12:131–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Narayanaswamy M, McRae K, Slinger P, Dugas G, Kanellakos GW, Roscoe A, Lacroix M. Choosing a lung isolation device for thoracic surgery: a randomized trial of three bronchial blockers versus double lumen tubes. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1097–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nuss D, Kelly RE Jr. Indications and technique of Nuss procedure for pectus excavatum. Thorac Surg Clin. 2010;20:583–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ko R, McRae K, Darling G, Waddell TK, McGlade D, Cheung K, Katz J, Slinger P. The use of air in the inspired gas mixture during two-lung ventilation delays lung collapse during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1092–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hampton T, Armstrong S, Russel WJ. Estimating the diameter of the left main bronchus. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;28:540–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karabulut N. CT Assessment of tracheal carinal angle and its determinants. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:787–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weiss M, Doell C, Koepfer N, Madjdpour C, Woitzek K, Bernet V. Rapid pressure compensation by automated cuff pressure controllers worsens sealing in tracheal tubes. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:273–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roscoe A, Kanellakos GW, McRae K, Slinger P. Pressure exerted by endobronchial devices. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:655–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamás Végh
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Marianna Juhász
    • 1
    • 4
  • Attila Enyedi
    • 2
  • István Takács
    • 2
  • József Kollár
    • 3
  • Béla Fülesdi
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical and Health Science CentreUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary
  2. 2.Institute of Surgery, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical and Health Science CentreUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary
  3. 3.Department of Radiology, Medical and Health Science CentreUniversity of DebrecenDebrecenHungary
  4. 4.Outcomes Research ConsortiumLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations