Advertisement

Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 189–194 | Cite as

Preoxygenation with 20º head-up tilt provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea than conventional preoxygenation in non-obese healthy adults

  • Venkateswaran Ramkumar
  • Goneppanavar UmeshEmail author
  • Frenny Ann Philip
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Failed airway is the anesthesiologist’s nightmare. Although conventional preoxygenation can provide time, atelectasis occurs in the dependent areas of the lungs immediately after anesthetic induction. Therefore, alternatives such as positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and head-up tilt during preoxygenation have been explored. We compared the conventional preoxygenation technique (group C) with 20º head-up tilt (group H) and 5 cmH2O PEEP (group P) in non-obese individuals for non-hypoxic apnea duration.

Methods

A total of 45 patients were enrolled (15 in each group). After 5 min of preoxygenation, intubation was performed after induction of anesthesia with thiopentone and succinylcholine. After confirming the tracheal intubation by esophageal detector device and capnogram, all patients were administered vecuronium to maintain neuromuscular blockade and midazolam to prevent awareness. Post-induction, patients in all groups were left apneic in supine position with the tracheal tube exposed to atmosphere till the SpO2 dropped to 93% or 10 min of safe apnea was achieved.

Results

The demographic data were comparable. Non-hypoxic apnea duration was higher with group H (452 ± 71 s) compared to group C (364 ± 83 s, P = 0.030). Group P did not show significant increase in the duration of non-hypoxic apnea (413 ± 86 s). There were no adverse outcomes or events.

Conclusions

Preoxygenation is clinically and statistically more efficacious and by inference more efficient in the 20º head-up position than with conventional technique in non-obese healthy adults. Although application of 5 cmH2O PEEP provides longer duration of non-hypoxic apnea compared to conventional technique, it is not statistically significant.

Keywords

Preoxygenation Apnea PEEP Head-up tilt 

References

  1. 1.
    Drummond GB, Park GR. Arterial oxygen saturation before intubation of the trachea. An assessment of oxygenation techniques. Br J Anaesth. 1984;56:987–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thorpe CM, Gauntlett IS. Arterial oxygen saturation during induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:1012–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell MD. Routine pre-oxygenation: a new ‘minimum standard’ of care? Anaesthesia. 2004;59:943–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell IT, Beatty PC. Monitoring preoxygenation. Br J Anaesth. 1994;72:3–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berthoud M, Read DH, Norman J. Pre-oxygenation—how long? Anaesthesia. 1983;38:96–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russell GN, Smith CL, Snowdon SL, Bryson TH. Pre-oxygenation and the parturient patient. Anaesthesia. 1987;42:346–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berthoud MC, Peacock JE, Reilly CS. Effectiveness of preoxygenation in morbidly obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67:464–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valentine SJ, Marjot R, Monk CR. Preoxygenation in the elderly: a comparison of the four-maximal-breath and three-minute techniques. Anesth Analg. 1990;71:516–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lundquist H, Hedenstierna G, Strandberg A, Tokics L, Brismar B. CT-assessment of dependent lung densities in man during general anesthesia. Acta Radiol. 1995;36:626–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tokics L, Hedenstierna G, Strandberg A, Brismar B, Lundquist H. Lung collapse and gas exchange during general anesthesia: effects of spontaneous breathing, muscle paralysis, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Anesthesiology. 1987;66:157–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cressey DM, Berthoud MC, Reilly CS. Effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure to enhance pre-oxygenation in morbidly obese women. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:680–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:580–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herriger A, Frascarolo P, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. The effect of positive airway pressure during pre-oxygenation and induction of anaesthesia upon duration of non-hypoxic apnoea. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:243–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nunn JF. Nunn’s applied respiratory physiology. 3rd ed. London: Butterworth Heinemann; 1987. p. 350–70.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Altermatt FR, Munoz HR, Delfino AE, Cortinez LI. Pre-oxygenation in the obese patient: effects of position on tolerance to apnoea. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:706–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baraka AS, Hanna MT, Jabbour SI, Nawfal MF, Sibai AA, Yazbeck VG, Khoury NI, Karam KS. Preoxygenation of pregnant and nonpregnant women in the head-up versus supine position. Anesth Analg. 1992;75:757–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dixon BJ, Dixon JB, Carden JR, Burn AJ, Schachter LM, Playfair JM, Laurie CP, O’Brien PE. Preoxygenation is more effective in the 25 degrees head-up position than in the supine position in severely obese patients: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:1110–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lane S, Saunders D, Schofield A, Padmanabhan R, Hildreth A, Laws D. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of pre-oxygenation in the 20 degrees head-up vs. supine position. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:1064–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kopman AF, Zhaku B, Lai KS. The “intubating dose” of succinylcholine: the effect of decreasing doses on recovery time. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1050–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rusca M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Hedenstierna G, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1835–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pelosi P, Croci M, Calappi E, Mulazzi D, Cerisara M, Vercesi P, Vicardi P, Gattinoni L. Prone positioning improves pulmonary function in obese patients during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:578–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Venkateswaran Ramkumar
    • 1
  • Goneppanavar Umesh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frenny Ann Philip
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnaesthesiologyKasturba Medical CollegeManipalIndia

Personalised recommendations