Advertisement

Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 366–372 | Cite as

Distortion of anterior airway anatomy during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope

  • Yoshihiro HirabayashiEmail author
  • Akifumi Fujita
  • Norimasa Seo
  • Hideharu Sugimoto
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

A non-line-of-sight view is expected to cause less movement of the anterior airway anatomy and cervical spine during laryngeal visualization. Reduced distortion of anterior airway anatomy during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope (GVL), compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, could explain the relatively easier nasotracheal intubation with the GVL. The purpose of this radiographic study was to compare the degree of anterior airway distortion and cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with the GVL and the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope.

Methods

Twenty patients requiring general anesthesia and tracheal intubation were studied. Each patient underwent laryngoscopy using the first-generation GVL and a direct laryngoscope with a Macintosh blade. During each laryngoscopy, a radiograph was taken when the best view of the larynx was obtained. Independent radiologists with subspeciality training in musculoskeletal imaging evaluated anterior airway distortion and cervical spine movement.

Results

The distance between the epiglottis and the posterior pharyngeal wall during the GlideScope procedure was 21% less than that during the Macintosh laryngoscopy (P < 0.05). Anterior deviations of the vertebral bodies from baseline were 27, 32, 36, and 39% less at the atlas, C2, C3, and C4 vertebrae, respectively, during the GlideScope procedure than those measured during Macintosh laryngoscopy (P < 0.01). Cervical extension between the occiput and C4 during the GlideScope procedure was 23% less than that during Macintosh laryngoscopy (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Both anterior airway distortion and cervical spine movement during laryngeal visualization were less with the GVL than with the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Keywords

GlideScope videolaryngoscope Macintosh laryngoscope Airway anatomy 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the radiology technologists at Jichi Medical University Hospital.

References

  1. 1.
    Hirabayashi Y. GlideScope videolaryngoscope facilitates nasotracheal intubation. Can J Anesth. 2006;53:1163–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xue F, Zhang G, Liu J, Li X, Sun H, Wang X, Li C, Liu K, Xu Y, Liu Y. A clinical assessment of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope in nasotracheal intubation with general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18:611–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, Cherry RA, Harle CC, Hoogstra J, Turkstra TP. A comparison of GlideScope videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:144–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H. A comparison of cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:635–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy using the Airway Scope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:1050–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hastings RH, Vigil AC, Hanna R, Yang BY, Sartoris DJ. Cervical spine movement during laryngoscopy with the Bullard, Macintosh and Miller laryngoscopes. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:859–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watts AD, Gelb AW, Bach DB, Pelz DM. Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation of patients with a potential cervical spine injury. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1335–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wong DM, Prabhu A, Chakraborty S, Tan G, Massicotte EM, Cooper R. Cervical spine motion during flexible bronchoscopy compared with the Lo-Pro GlideScope. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:424–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robitaille A, Williams SR, Tremblay M-H, Guilbert F, Thériault M, Drolet P. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope videolaryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:935–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:910–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshihiro Hirabayashi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Akifumi Fujita
    • 2
  • Norimasa Seo
    • 1
  • Hideharu Sugimoto
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care MedicineJichi Medical UniversityShimotsukeJapan
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyJichi Medical UniversityShimotsukeJapan

Personalised recommendations