Work stress and workload of full-time anesthesiologists in acute care hospitals in Japan
The number of anesthesiologists per population in Japan is small compared with that in Europe and North America. While there is a growing concern that hard work causes anesthesiologists’ fatigue and may compromise patient safety, the workload and physical stress, as well as the impact of staff support on physicians’ stress have not been assessed in detail. The goal of this study was to evaluate the working environment, anesthesia workload, and occupational stress of anesthesiologists in Japan.
A questionnaire survey was performed targeting 1010 members of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists working as anesthesiologists affiliated with acute care hospitals in Japan. Data on background information, working environment, operation anesthesia duties, and stress were collected, and the relationship of work stress with background, environment, and anesthesia duties was evaluated by linear regression analysis.
Responses were obtained from 383 full-time anesthesiologists (response rate, 43.9%). The total anesthesia time per week was 23.6 h on average. The work stress score was 114.3 ± 30.2 (mean ± SD) when the average workers’ work stress score in Japan was 100. The work stress score was significantly associated with “years of experience” (with experience < 10 years considered as the reference; 10–19 years: β = −0.18, P = 0.02, ≥20 years: β = −0.15, P = 0.04), “hospital with ≥500 beds” (with a hospital with ≤ 299 beds considered as the reference; β = 0.15, P = 0.04), “total time of anesthesia per week” (β = 0.18, P.02), “estimated annual cases managed by an anesthesiologist” (β = 0.12, P = 0.04) and “no-support stress” (β = 0.21, P < 0.01) on linear regression analysis (R2 = 0.12).
Our results provide a quantitative assessment of the duties of anesthesiologists and show that work stress among anesthesiologists is related to workload and other factors.
Key wordsAnesthesiologist Workload Stress Factors causing stress
- 1.Kobayashi K. Shortage of manpower in anesthesiologists (in Japanese). Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi (J Jpn Surg Soc). 2005;106:457.Google Scholar
- 2.Takeda J. The proposal of correspondence to shortage of manpower in anesthesiologists from Japan Society of Anesthesiologist (in Japanese). Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi (J Jpn Surg Soc). 2005;106:53.Google Scholar
- 3.Mizuno J, Yokoyama T, Ueki M, Fukushima T, Suzuki T, Hanaoka K. Regional differences in the numbers of anesthesiologist in Japan (in Japanese with English abstract). Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol). 2004;53:443–449.Google Scholar
- 7.Tushima M. The problem of regional differences in the numbers of anesthesiologists in Japan (in Japanese.) Nihon Rinsyoumasui Gakkaishi (J Jpn Soc Clin Anesth). 1996;16:9–11.Google Scholar
- 8.Kawakami N, Kobayashi F, Araki S, Haratani T, Furui H. Assessment of job stress dimension based on the job demands-control model of employees of telecommunication and electric power companies in Japan: reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Job Content Questionnaire. Int J Behav Med. 1995;2:358–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kawakami N. Manual of “diagram for measuring occupational stress” (in Japanese). In: Kato M, editor. The report of the “Study on Prevention of Work-Related Diseases” by the Ministry of Labor. Tokyo: Tokyo Medical University Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health; 2000. p. 11–26.Google Scholar
- 11.Yagishita Y, Shimizu Y, Takasawa T, Nomoyama S, Yamane K, Takeda K, Miyazaki H. Survey of condition of anesthesiology departments at national centers for advanced and specialized medical care, national hospitals and national sanatoriums; study of the causes of anesthesiologist shortage; and suggested reform measures. (in Japanese with English abstract) IRYO (Japanese J National Medical Services). 2002;56:745–750.Google Scholar
- 18.Baker DB, Karasek RA. Occupational stress. In: Levy BS, Wegman DH, editors. Occupatinal health: recognizing and preventing work-related disease and injury. 3rd ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1995. p. 381–405.Google Scholar