Journal of Anesthesia

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 87–92 | Cite as

An individualized recruitment maneuver for mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery

  • Ryohei Serita
  • Hiroshi Morisaki
  • Junzo Takeda
Original Article



The recruitment maneuver (RM) has been shown to improve oxygenation for post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) patients; however, sustained inflation of the lung gives rise to hypotension. The primary goal of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of our proposed RM, defined on the basis of dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn).


Twenty-eight patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with CPB were assigned to two treatment groups: an individualized RM group, in which a pressure equal to 15 ml × real body weight/Cdyn + positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) cmH2O was applied for 15 s; and a control RM group, in which a pressure of 20 cmH2O was applied for 25 s. Arterial blood pressure, cardiac output, pulmonary artery pressure, and heart rate (HR) were monitored. Tidal volume (VT), and airway pressure were continuously obtained from an expiratory flow meter and pressure monitor. Blood samples were obtained and analyzed with a blood gas analyzer.


The changes in HR, mean arterial pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, and cardiac index at the end of the RM were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean airway pressure of sustained inflation was 28.3 ± 1.3 cmH2O in the individualized RM group. The individualized RM significantly improved the Cdyn and partial pressure arterial oxygen/inspiratory fraction of oxygen (P/F) ratio compared with values in the control RM group (P = 0.026 and P = 0.012, respectively).


The present study indicates that the individualized RM resulted in minimum changes of hemodynamics and brought about improvement in oxygenation and lung compliance.

Key words

Recruitment maneuver Dynamic compliance Cardiopulmonary bypass Cardiac surgery 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dyhr T, Laursen N, Larsson A. Effects of lung recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on lung volume, respiratory mechanics and alveolar gas mixing in patients ventilated after cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:717–725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van den Berg PC, Jansen JR, Pinsky MR. Effect of positive pressure on venous return in volume-loaded cardiac surgical patients. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92:1223–1231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Federici A, Ciccone M, Gattullo D, Losano G. Systolic and diastolic changes in human coronary blood flow during Valsalva maneuver. Clin Physiol. 2000;20:19–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van den Berg PC, Grimbergen CA, Spaan JA, Pinsky MR. Positive pressure inspiration differentially affects right and left ventricular outputs in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. J Crit Care. 1997;12:56–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grasso S, Mascia L, Del Turco M, Malacarne P, Giunta F, Brochard L, Slutsky AS, Marco Ranieri V. Effects of recruiting maneuvers in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with protective ventilatory strategy. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:795–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nielsen J, Ostergaard M, Kjaergaard J, Tingleff J, Berthelsen PG, Nygard E, Larsson A. Lung recruitment maneuver depresses central hemodynamics in patients following cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1189–1194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richard JC, Maggiore S, Mercat A. Where are we with recruitment maneuvers in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2003;9:22–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kacmarek RM. Strategies to optimize alveolar recruitment. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001;7:15–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stahl CA, Moller K, Schumann S, Kuhlen R, Sydow M, Putensen C, Guttmann J. Dynamic versus static respiratory mechanics in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2090–2098.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karason S, Sondergaard S, Lundin S, Wiklund J, Stenqvist O. A new method for non-invasive, maneuver-free determination of “static” pressure-volume curves during dynamic/therapeutic mechanical ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:578–585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Kessler V, Sjostrand UH, Hedlund A, Mols G, Rubertsson S, Markstrom AM, Guttmann J. Static versus dynamic respiratory mechanics for setting the ventilator. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85:577–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Royster RL. Myocardial dysfunction following cardiopulmonary bypass: recovery patterns, predictors of inotropic need, theoretical concepts of inotropic administration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1993;7:19–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lueke T, Pelosi P. Clinical review: positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac output. Crit Care. 2005;9:607–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pinsky MR. Cardiovascular issues in respiratory care. Chest. 2005;128(5 Suppl 2):592–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romand JA, Shi W, Pinsky MR. Cardiopulmonary effects of positive pressure ventilation during acute lung injury. Chest. 1995;108:1041–1048.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ng CS, Wan S, Yim AP, Arifi AA. Pulmonary dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Chest. 2002;121:1269–1277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rady MY, Ryan T. Perioperative predictors of extubation failure and the effect on clinical outcome after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:340–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suematsu Y, Sato H, Ohtsuka T, Kotsuka Y, Araki S, Takamoto S. Predictive risk factors for delayed extubation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Vessels. 2000;15:214–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hachenberg T, Tenling A, Nystrom SO, Tyden H, Hedenstierna G. Ventilation-perfusion inequality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:509–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Asimakopoulos G, Smith PL, Ratnatunga CP, Taylor KM. Lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1107–1115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hager DN, Krishnan JA, Hayden DL, Bower RG. Tidal volume reduction in patients with acute lung injury when plateau pressures are not high. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172:1241–1245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deans K, Minneci P, Cui X, Banks S, Natanson C, Eichaker P. Mechanical ventilation in ARDS: one size does not fit all. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:1141–1144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pinhu L, Whitehead T, Evans T, Griffiths M. Ventilatorassociated lung injury. Lancet. 2003;361:332–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karason S, Sondergaard S, Lundin S, Wiklund J, Stenqvist O. Evaluation of pressure/volume loops based on intratracheal pressure measurements during dynamic conditions. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:571–577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryohei Serita
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Morisaki
    • 2
  • Junzo Takeda
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyTokyo Dental College Ichikawa General HospitalIchikawaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology, School of MedicineKeio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations