Journal of Gastroenterology

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 494–503

Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Japanese subgroup analysis of the REACH trial

  • Masatoshi Kudo
  • Etsuro Hatano
  • Shinichi Ohkawa
  • Hirofumi Fujii
  • Akihide Masumoto
  • Junji Furuse
  • Yoshiyuki Wada
  • Hiroshi Ishii
  • Shuntaro Obi
  • Shuichi Kaneko
  • Seiji Kawazoe
  • Osamu Yokosuka
  • Masafumi Ikeda
  • Katsuaki Ukai
  • Sojiro Morita
  • Akihito Tsuji
  • Toshihiro Kudo
  • Mitsuo Shimada
  • Yukio Osaki
  • Ryosuke Tateishi
  • Gen Sugiyama
  • Paolo Benjamin Abada
  • Ling Yang
  • Takuji Okusaka
  • Andrew Xiuxuan Zhu
Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract

Abstract

Background

REACH evaluated ramucirumab in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. In the intent-to-treat population (n = 565), a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) was not observed. In patients with an elevated baseline α-fetoprotein (AFP) level (400 ng/mL or greater), an improvement in OS was demonstrated. An analysis of the Japanese patients in REACH was performed.

Methods

An analysis was performed with the subset of the intent-to-treat population enrolled in Japan (n = 93).

Results

The median OS was 12.9 months for the ramucirumab arm (n = 45) and 8.0 months for the placebo arm (n = 48) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.621 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.391–0.986); P = 0.0416]. The median progression-free survival was 4.1 months for the ramucirumab arm and 1.7 months for the placebo arm [HR 0.449 (95 % CI 0.285–0.706); P = 0.0004]. The objective response rates were 11 % for the ramucirumab arm and 2 % for the placebo arm (P = 0.0817). The grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in more than 5 % of patients with a higher incidence for the ramucirumab arm (n = 44) than for the placebo arm (n = 47) were ascites (7% vs 2 %), hypertension (7 % vs 2 %), and cholangitis (7 % vs 0 %). In patients with a baseline AFP level of 400 ng/mL or greater, the median OS was 12.9 months for the ramucirumab arm (n = 20) and 4.3 months for the placebo arm (n = 22) [HR 0.464 (95 % CI 0.232–0.926); P = 0.0263].

Conclusions

In the Japanese patients in REACH, ramucirumab treatment improved OS, including in patients with a baseline AFP level of 400 ng/mL or greater; improvements in progression-free survival and objective response rate were also demonstrated. The safety profile of ramucirumab was acceptable and well tolerated in Japanese patients.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01140347.

Keywords

α-Fetoprotein Clinical trial Japan Liver neoplasms Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 

Supplementary material

535_2016_1247_MOESM1_ESM.docx (45 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 44 kb)
535_2016_1247_MOESM2_ESM.docx (47 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 46 kb)
535_2016_1247_MOESM3_ESM.docx (47 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 47 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0. Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012: liver cancer. CancerBase no. 11. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available via http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx. Accessed 13 Feb 2015.
  2. 2.
    Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kudo M, Lencioni R, Marrero JA, et al. Regional differences in sorafenib-treated patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: GIDEON observational study. Liver Int. 2016. doi:10.1111/liv.13096.
  4. 4.
    Ikeda M, Mitsunaga S, Shimizu S, et al. Current status of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan. Chin Clin Oncol. 2013;2:40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruix J, Gores GJ, Mazzaferro V. Hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical frontiers and perspectives. Gut. 2014;63:844–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kudo M. Surveillance, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of liver cancer in Japan. Liver Cancer. 2015;4:39–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kudo M. Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma differ between Japan, United States and Europe. Liver Cancer. 2015;4:85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:25–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lencioni R, Kudo M, Ye SL, et al. GIDEON (Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma and Of its treatment with sorafeNib): second interim analysis. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68:609–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iavarone M, Cabibbo G, Piscaglia F, et al. Field-practice study of sorafenib therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective multicenter study in Italy. Hepatology. 2011;54:2055–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sullivan LA, Brekken RA. The VEGF family in cancer and antibody-based strategies for their inhibition. MAbs. 2010;2:165–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tugues S, Koch S, Gualandi L, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factors and receptors: anti-angiogenic therapy in the treatment of cancer. Mol Asp Med. 2011;32:88–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amini A, Masoumi Moghaddam S, Morris DL, et al. The critical role of vascular endothelial growth factor in tumor angiogenesis. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2012;12:23–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu AX, Duda DG, Sahani DV, et al. HCC and angiogenesis: possible targets and future directions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:292–301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spratlin JL, Cohen RB, Eadens M, et al. Phase I pharmacologic and biologic study of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:780–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu AX, Park JO, Ryoo BY, et al. Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:859–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruix J, Raoul JL, Sherman M, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: subanalyses of a phase III trial. J Hepatol. 2012;57:821–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheng AL, Kang YK, Lin DY, et al. Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4067–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hironaka S, Shimada Y, Sugimoto N, et al. RAINBOW: a global, phase III, randomized, double-blind study of ramucirumab (RAM) plus paclitaxel (PTX) versus placebo (PL) plus PTX in the treatment of metastatic gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinoma (mGC) following disease progression on first-line platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-containing combination therapy—efficacy analysis in Japanese and Western patients. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15 Suppl):4005.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muro K, Cheul Oh S, et al. Subgroup analysis of East Asians in RAINBOW: a phase 3 trial of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13153.
  22. 22.
    Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ, et al. Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014;383:31–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhu AX, Finn RS, Mulcahy M, et al. A phase II and biomarker study of ramucirumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the VEGF receptor-2, as first-line monotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:6614–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Gastroenterology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masatoshi Kudo
    • 1
  • Etsuro Hatano
    • 2
  • Shinichi Ohkawa
    • 3
  • Hirofumi Fujii
    • 4
  • Akihide Masumoto
    • 5
  • Junji Furuse
    • 6
  • Yoshiyuki Wada
    • 7
  • Hiroshi Ishii
    • 8
  • Shuntaro Obi
    • 9
  • Shuichi Kaneko
    • 10
  • Seiji Kawazoe
    • 11
  • Osamu Yokosuka
    • 12
  • Masafumi Ikeda
    • 13
  • Katsuaki Ukai
    • 14
  • Sojiro Morita
    • 15
  • Akihito Tsuji
    • 16
  • Toshihiro Kudo
    • 17
  • Mitsuo Shimada
    • 18
  • Yukio Osaki
    • 19
  • Ryosuke Tateishi
    • 20
  • Gen Sugiyama
    • 21
  • Paolo Benjamin Abada
    • 22
  • Ling Yang
    • 23
  • Takuji Okusaka
    • 24
  • Andrew Xiuxuan Zhu
    • 25
  1. 1.Kindai University Faculty of MedicineOsaka-SayamaJapan
  2. 2.Kyoto University HospitalKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Kanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
  4. 4.Jichi Medical UniversityShimotsukeJapan
  5. 5.Aso Iizuka HospitalFukuokaJapan
  6. 6.Kyorin University School of Medicine HospitalTokyoJapan
  7. 7.National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical CenterFukuokaJapan
  8. 8.The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
  9. 9.Kyoundo HospitalSasaki InstituteTokyoJapan
  10. 10.Kanazawa University HospitalIshikawaJapan
  11. 11.Saga-Ken Medical Centre KoseikanSagaJapan
  12. 12.Chiba University HospitalChibaJapan
  13. 13.National Cancer Center Hospital EastChibaJapan
  14. 14.Sendai Medical CenterSendaiJapan
  15. 15.Kochi Health Sciences CenterKochiJapan
  16. 16.Kagawa University HospitalTakamatsuJapan
  17. 17.Osaka University HospitalOsakaJapan
  18. 18.Tokushima University HospitalTokushimaJapan
  19. 19.Osaka Red Cross HospitalOsakaJapan
  20. 20.The University of Tokyo HospitalTokyoJapan
  21. 21.Kurume University Medical CenterFukuokaJapan
  22. 22.Eli Lilly and CompanyIndianapolisUSA
  23. 23.Eli Lilly and CompanyBridgewaterUSA
  24. 24.National Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
  25. 25.Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations