Journal of Gastroenterology

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 466–475

Image assessment of Barrett’s esophagus using the simplified narrow band imaging classification

  • Masayuki Kato
  • Kenichi Goda
  • Yuichi Shimizu
  • Akira Dobashi
  • Masakazu Takahashi
  • Masahiro Ikegami
  • Tadakazu Shimoda
  • Mototsugu Kato
  • Prateek Sharma
Original Article—Alimentary Tract
  • 388 Downloads

Abstract

Background

A simplified narrow band imaging (NBI) classification has been proposed with the objective of integrating multiple classifications of NBI surface patterns in Barrett’s esophagus (BE). Little is known about the impact of the simplified NBI classification on the diagnosis of BE when using high-definition magnification endoscopy with NBI (HM-NBI). This study aimed to evaluate (a) the reproducibility of NBI surface patterns and predicted histology and (b) the diagnostic accuracy of interpreting HM-NBI images by using the simplified NBI classification.

Methods

Two hundred and forty-eight HM-NBI images from macroscopically normal areas in patients with BE were retrieved from endoscopy databases and randomized for review by four endoscopists (two experts, two non-experts). We evaluated inter- and intra-observer agreement of the interpretation of NBI surface patterns and the predicted histology (dysplasia vs. non-dysplasia), as calculated by using κ statistics, and diagnostic values of the prediction.

Results

The overall inter-observer agreements were substantial for mucosal pattern (κ = 0.73) and vascular pattern (κ = 0.71), and almost perfect for predicting dysplastic histology (κ = 0.80). The overall intra-observer agreements were almost perfect for mucosal (κ = 0.84) and vascular patterns (κ = 0.86), and predicting dysplastic histology (κ = 0.89). The mean accuracy in predicting dysplastic histology for all reviewers was 95 % (experts: 96.8 %, non-experts: 93.1 %).

Conclusions

The simplified NBI classification has the potential to provide high diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy when using HM-NBI.

Keywords

Barrett’s esophagus Esophageal adenocarcinoma Magnification endoscopy Narrow band imaging Observer agreement 

References

  1. 1.
    Pohl H, Sirovich B, Welch HG. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence: are we reaching the peak? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1468–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Gastroenterological Association, Spechler SJ, Sharma P, et al. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the Management of Barrett’s Esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eloubeidi MA, Mason AC, Desmond RA, et al. Temporal trends (1973–1997) in survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma in the United States: a glimmer of hope? Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1627–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hur C, Miller M, Kong CY, et al. Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality. Cancer. 2013;119:1149–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levine DS, Blount PL, Rudolph RE. Safety of a systematic endoscopic biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1152–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J, et al. A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: the AGA Chicago Workshop. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:310–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vieth M, Ell C, Gossner L, et al. Histological analysis of endoscopic resection specimens from 326 patients with Barrett’s esophagus and early neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2004;36:776–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abrams JA, Kapel RC, Lindberg GM, et al. Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett’s esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States. Clin Gastoenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:736–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goda K, Kato T, Tajiri H. Endoscopic diagnosis of early Barrett’s neoplasia: perspectives for advanced endoscopic technology. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:311–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sano Y, Muto M, Tajiri H, et al. Optical/digital chromoendoscopy during colonoscopy using narrow-band imaging system. Dig Endosc. 2005;17:S43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gono K, Obi T, Yamaguchi M, et al. Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:568–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh R, Anagnostopoulos G, Yao K, et al. Narrow-band imaging with magnification in Barrett’s esophagus: validation of a simplified grading system of mucosal morphology patterns against histology. Endoscopy. 2008;40:457–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kara MA, Ennahachi M, Fockens P, et al. Detection and classification of the mucosal and vascular patterns (mucosal morphology) in Barrett’s esophagus by using narrow band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:155–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sharma P, Bansal A, Mathur S, et al. The utility of a novel narrow band imaging endoscopy system in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:167–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anagnostopoulos GK, Yao K, Kaye P, et al. Novel endoscopic observation in Barrett’s oesophagus using high resolution magnification endoscopy and narrow band imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:501–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alvarez Herrero L, Curvers WL, Bansal A, et al. Zooming in on Barrett oesophagus using narrow-band imaging: an international observer agreement study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:1068–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh M, Bansal A, Curvers WL, et al. Observer agreement in the assessment of narrowband imaging system surface patterns in Barrett’s esophagus: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:745–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer: part I. Esophagus. 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer: parts II and III. Esophagus. 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yao K, Anagnostopoulos GK, Ragunath K, et al. Magnifying endoscopy for diagnosing and delineating early gastric cancer. Endoscopy. 2009;41:462–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaise M, Kato M, Urashima M, et al. Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of superficial depressed gastric lesions. Endoscopy. 2009;41:310–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000;47:251–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull. 1971;76:378–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Curvers WL, ten Kate FJ, Krishnadath KK, et al. Low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: overdiagnosed and underestimated. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1523–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Skacel M, Petras RE, Gramlich TL, et al. The diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus and its implications for disease progression. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3383–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sharma P, Hawes RH, Bansal A, et al. Standard endoscopy with random biopsies versus narrow band imaging targeted biopsies in Barrett’s oesophagus: a prospective, international, randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2013;62:15–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Camus M, Coriat R, Leblanc S, et al. Helpfulness of the combination of acetic acid and FICE in the detection of Barrett’s epithelium and Barrett’s associated neoplasias. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;28(18):1921–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoffman A, Korczynski O, Tresch A, et al. Acetic acid compared with i-scan imaging for detecting Barrett’s esophagus: a randomized, comparative trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:46–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Iwashita C, Miura Y, Osawa H, et al. Laser imaging facilitates early detection of synchronous adenocarcinomas in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Endosc. 2016. doi:10.5946/ce.2016.027.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Gastroenterology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masayuki Kato
    • 1
  • Kenichi Goda
    • 2
  • Yuichi Shimizu
    • 3
  • Akira Dobashi
    • 2
  • Masakazu Takahashi
    • 3
  • Masahiro Ikegami
    • 4
  • Tadakazu Shimoda
    • 5
  • Mototsugu Kato
    • 6
  • Prateek Sharma
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of EndoscopyThe Jikei University Katsushika Medical CenterTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of EndoscopyThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of GastroenterologyHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
  4. 4.Department of PathologyThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Division of PathologyShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
  6. 6.National Hospital Organization Hakodate HospitalHakodateJapan
  7. 7.Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and MotilityUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterKansasUSA

Personalised recommendations