A comparative study between sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis
- 1.2k Downloads
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).
A total of 110 patients were observed between February 2008 and May 2013 in seven Korean centers. Fifty patients were treated with HAIC, and 60 patients were treated with sorafenib.
The disease control rate in the HAIC was significantly higher than that in the sorafenib group (p < 0.001), although there was no significant difference in the objective response rate (p = 0.214). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the HAIC group than in the sorafenib group (7.1 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.011). The median time to-progression (TTP) was also significantly longer in the HAIC group than in the sorafenib group (3.3 vs. 2.1 months, p = 0.034). In the multivariate analysis, tumor diameter (≥ 10 cm) and the absence of combined loco-regional treatment were significant prognostic factors influencing OS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.010, respectively) and TTP (p = 0.017 and p = 0.006, respectively). The treatment modality tended to be a significant prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.052), but not for tumor progression (p = 0.121).
HAIC is comparable with sorafenib in terms of OS and TTP in advanced HCC patients with PVTT. HAIC shows more favorable treatment responses compared with sorafenib. Therefore, HAIC might be an alternative treatment modality to sorafenib in advanced HCC patients with PVTT.
KeywordsHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy Sorafenib Hepatocellular carcinoma Portal vein tumor thrombosis
This work was supported by a National R & D Program grant for cancer control from the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (R0620390-1).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 10.Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):25–34 Epub 2008/12/20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kim HY, Kim JD, Bae SH, Park JY, Han KH, Woo HY, et al. A comparative study of high-dose hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin for intractable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol. 2010;16(4):355–61 Epub 2011/03/19.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Eun JR, Lee HJ, Moon HJ, Kim TN, Kim JW, Chang JC. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using high-dose 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin with or without interferon-alpha for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(12):1477–86 Epub 2009/12/05.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Korean Liver Cancer Study Group, National Cancer Center. Practice guidelines for managemeQuerynt of hepatocellular carcinoma 2009. Korean J. Hepatol. 2009;15(3):391–423. Epub 2009/09/29.Google Scholar
- 27.Yau T, Chan P, Ng KK, Chok SH, Cheung TT, Fan ST, et al. Phase 2 open-label study of single-agent sorafenib in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis B-endemic Asian population: presence of lung metastasis predicts poor response. Cancer. 2009;115(2):428–36 Epub 2008/12/25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar