Clinical factors predictive of insufficient liver enhancement on the hepatocyte-phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with liver cirrhosis
- First Online:
- 430 Downloads
Estimating liver parenchymal enhancement prior to gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is crucial to accurate detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. We aimed to clarify the factors predictive of liver enhancement in a relatively large sample of patients.
Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR images of 328 patients with liver cirrhosis (Child–Pugh class A in 223 patients, class B in 71 patients, and class C in 34 patients) were analyzed retrospectively. The liver parenchymal signal intensity (SI) was measured in pre-contrast T1-weighted images and hepatocyte phase images. The relative enhancement (RE) was calculated: (hepatocyte phase SI–pre-contrast SI)/pre-contrast SI. We analyzed the correlation between hepatic function parameters and RE.
RE of patients with Child–Pugh A cirrhosis was significantly higher than that of patients with Child–Pugh B or C cirrhosis (both P < 0.001). Among various clinical factors, platelet count, prothrombin activity, albumin, sodium, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, MELD-Na score, Child–Pugh score, and the presence of ascites were significantly correlated with RE. A multiple stepwise regression analysis revealed that MELD-Na, albumin, and the presence of ascites were the only factors that predicted liver parenchymal enhancement on hepatocyte-phase images.
The degree of liver parenchymal enhancement after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration was correlated with liver function parameters. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR images require careful interpretation, particularly in patients with cirrhosis and clinical factors such as high MELD-Na score, hypoalbuminemia, or ascites.
KeywordsGd-EOB-DTPA Liver cirrhosis Liver function Magnetic resonance imaging
Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid
Region of interest
Relative enhancement ratio
Model for end stage liver disease
Model for end stage liver disease-sodium
- 3.Hammerstingl R, Huppertz A, Breuer J, Balzer T, Blakeborough A, Carter R, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:457–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Raman SS, Leary C, Bluemke DA, Amendola M, Sahani D, McTavish JD, et al. Improved characterization of focal liver lesions with liver-specific gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34:163–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Kim HY, Choi JY, Kim CW, Bae SH, Yoon SK, Lee YJ, et al. Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma only in patients with Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:850–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Tajima T, Takao H, Akai H, Kiryu S, Imamura H, Watanabe Y, et al. Relationship between liver function and liver signal intensity in hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010;34:362–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Tschirch FT, Struwe A, Petrowsky H, Kakales I, Marincek B, Weishaupt D. Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with liver cirrhosis: visualization of the biliary ducts in comparison with patients with normal liver parenchyma. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1577–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Somsouk M, Guy J, Biggins SW, Vittinghoff E, Kohn MA, Inadomi JM. Ascites improves upon [corrected] serum sodium plus [corrected] model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) for predicting mortality in patients with advanced liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:741–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar