Journal of Gastroenterology

, Volume 48, Issue 9, pp 1081–1089

Development of a novel rat model with pancreatic fistula and the prevention of this complication using tissue-engineered myoblast sheets

  • Takayuki Tanaka
  • Tamotsu Kuroki
  • Tomohiko Adachi
  • Shinichiro Ono
  • Amane Kitasato
  • Masataka Hirabaru
  • Mitsuhisa Takatsuki
  • Susumu Eguchi
Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is one of the most important complications of pancreatic surgery. The aims of this study were to establish a PF model in rats and to investigate the efficacy of our new method for preventing PF, which utilizes myoblast sheets made using tissue engineering techniques.

Methods

To establish a PF model, the rats underwent transection of each of four pancreatic ducts: the gastric, duodenal, common, and splenic ducts, respectively. Their ascitic amylase and lipase levels were then measured. To investigate the efficacy of myoblast sheets at preventing PF, a myoblast sheet was attached to the pancreatic stump in the PF models. The levels of amylase and lipase in both serum and ascites were then measured, and surgical specimens were investigated pathologically.

Results

The new PF model established by transecting the splenic duct in rats may prove very useful. There were no significant differences in serum amylase and lipase levels between the myoblast sheet (+) group and the sheet (−) group. However, there were significant differences in ascitic amylase and lipase levels between the two groups (p < 0.05). Among the pathological findings, the number of inflammatory cells in the myoblast sheet group was smaller than that in the control group. In addition, the presence of the myoblast sheets on the surface of the pancreatic stump was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining.

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate the efficacy of the new rat model of PF presented herein, and that it might be possible to prevent PF using myoblast sheets.

Keywords

Pancreatic fistula Myoblast sheet Tissue engineering Rat model 

References

  1. 1.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Komagome M, Shin N, Cho N, Ishida T, et al. Risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:322–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fahy BN, Frey CF, Ho HS, Beckett L, Bold RJ. Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;183:237–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christein JD, Kendrick ML, Iqbal CW, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB. Distal pancreatectomy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:922–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Velanovich V. Case-control comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:95–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92:539–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E, Scopelliti F, Casarotto A, Bassi C. Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2008;15:247–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Berge Henegouwen MI, De Wit LT, Van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:18–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Kanematsu T. Surgical management for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2005;12:283–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Misawa T, Shiba H, Usuba T, Nojiri T, Uwagawa T, Ishida Y, et al. Safe and quick distal pancreatectomy using a staggered six-row stapler. Am J Surg. 2008;195:115–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A, Fourtanier G, Hay JM, Holmières F, et al. Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2003;237:57–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kawai M, Tani M, Yamaue H. Transection using bipolar scissors reduces pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15:366–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watanabe K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, Yang J, Kikuchi A, Okano T, et al. Development of transplantable genetically modified corneal epithelial cell sheets for gene therapy. Biomaterials. 2007;28:745–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, Watanabe K, Yamamoto K, Adachi E, et al. Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Eng J Med. 2004;351:1187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ohki T, Yamato M, Murakami D, Takagi R, Yang J, Namiki H, et al. Treatment of esophageal ulcerations using endoscopic transplantation of tissue-engineered autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets in a canine model. Gut. 2006;55:1704–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hata H, Matsumiya G, Miyagawa S, Kondoh H, Kawaguchi N, Matsuura N, et al. Grafted skeletal myoblast sheets attenuate myocardial remodeling in pacing-induced canine heart failure model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:918–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Memon IA, Sawa Y, Fukushima N, Matsumiya G, Miyagawa S, Taketani S, et al. Repair of impaired myocardium by means of implantation of engineered autologous myoblast sheets. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:1333–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Page BJ, du Toit DF, Muller CJ, Mattysen J, Lyners R, et al. An immunocytochemical profile of the endocrine pancreas using an occlusive duct ligation model. JOP. 2000;1:191–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Githens S. Differentiation and development of the pancreas in animals. In: Lang V, Go W, editors. The pancreas: biology, pathobiology and disease. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1993. p. 21–55.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Balcom JH IV, Keck T, Warshaw AL, Graeme-Cook F, Fernández-del Castillo C, et al. Prevention of pancreatic fistula with a new synthetic, absorbable sealant: evaluation in a dog model. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:490–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Truty MJ, Sawyer MD, Que FG. Decreasing pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy: saline-coupled radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:998–1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maciver A, McCall M, Mihalicz D, Al-Adra D, Pawlick R, Shapiro AM. The use of bovine pericardial buttress on linear stapler fails to reduce pancreatic fistula incidence in a porcine pancreatic transaction model. HPB Surg. 2011;624060 (epub 25 Oct 2011).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Choi SB, Lee JS, Kim WB, Song TJ, Suh SO, Choi SY. Efficacy of the omental roll-up technique in pancreaticojejunostomy as a strategy to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg. 2012;147:145–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsusue S, Takeda H, Nakamura Y, Nishimura S, Koizumi S. A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Surg Today. 1998;28:719–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuroki T, Tajima Y, Tsutsumi R, Tsuneoka N, Fukuda K, Haraguchi M, et al. Gastric wall-covering method for the prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic resection. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007;54:935–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y, Nakamura S, Takeyoshi I, Ohya T, et al. Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg. 1998;22:494–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kajiyama Y, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Akiyama H. Quick and simple distal pancreatectomy using the GIA stapler: report of 35 cases. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T, Sekihara M, Hara T, Kori T, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:922–5.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y, Hori Y, Ueda T, Takeyama Y, et al. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg. 1999;86:608–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sugo H, Mikami Y, Matsumoto F, Tsumura H, Watanabe Y, Futagawa S. Comparison of ultrasonically activated scalpel versus conventional division for the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001;8:349–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Matsumoto T, Ishio T, Sasaki A, Aramaki M, Bandoh T, Kawano K. Pancreatic resection with ultrasonically activated scalpel: preliminary observation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;49:635–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Büchler M, Friess H, Klempa I, Hermanek P, Sulkowski U, Becker H, et al. Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complication following pancreatic resection. Am J Surg. 1992;163:125–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Connor S, Alexakis N, Garden OJ, Leandros E, Bramis J, Wigmore SJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the value of somatostatin and its analogues in reducing complications associated with pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1059–67.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hackert T, Buchler MW, Wemer J. Surgical options in the management of pancreatic cancer. Minerva Chir. 2009;64:465–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260:920–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ohashi K, Yokoyama T, Yamato M, Kuge H, Kanehiro H, Tsutsumi M, et al. Engineering functional two- and three-dimensional liver systems in vivo using hepatic tissue sheets. Nat Med. 2007;13:880–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takayuki Tanaka
    • 1
  • Tamotsu Kuroki
    • 1
  • Tomohiko Adachi
    • 1
  • Shinichiro Ono
    • 1
  • Amane Kitasato
    • 1
  • Masataka Hirabaru
    • 1
  • Mitsuhisa Takatsuki
    • 1
  • Susumu Eguchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryNagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations