Journal of Gastroenterology

, Volume 45, Issue 8, pp 838–845 | Cite as

Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population

  • Yinglong Huang
  • Wei Gong
  • Bingzhong Su
  • Fachao Zhi
  • Side Liu
  • Yang Bai
  • Bo Jiang
Original Article—Alimentary Tract

Abstract

Background and aim

Repeat colonoscopy is often performed within a short time after polypectomy due to the fear that colorectal adenomas were missed during the initial colonoscopy or that new adenomas have developed. The aim of this study was to estimate the actual recurrence rate of adenoma and its association with the length of the surveillance interval after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.

Methods

A total of 1356 patients undergoing endoscopic polypectomy and completing three or more surveillence colonoscopies between 1976 and 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. The recurrence rates of adenoma and advanced adenoma and surveillance intervals after polypectomy were identified based on the features of adenomas detected on initial colonoscopy.

Results

The recurrence rates of advanced adenoma in patients with non-advanced adenoma on the initial colonoscopy were 0.9, 3.9, 5.8, and 29.2% during surveillance intervals of 1–3, 3–5, 5–10, and 10–20 years post-initial colonoscopy; for patients with advanced adenoma on the initial colonoscopy, the recurrence rates were 3.8, 13.1, 34.7, and 52.0% during the same surveillance intervals, respectively. Older age (p < 0.05 for trend) and male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27–3.53] were significantly associated with recurrence for advanced adenoma, as were the size and number of baseline adenoma (p < 0.05 for trend), tubulovillous, villous adenoma (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.24–5.32), and high-grade dysplasia (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07–2.42). When 5% of patients had recurring advanced adenoma, the surveillance interval was estimated to be 6.9 (95% CI 6.3–12.2) years in the low-risk group and 3.0 (95% CI 2.7–3.2) years in the high-risk group.

Conclusions

Among our patient group, the recurrence of advanced adenoma after polypectomy increased with the length of the surveillance interval. Based on our results, a 3-year follow-up of patients after polypectomy could be effective in preventing the recurrence of advanced adenoma in high-risk patients.

Keywords

Colorectal adenoma Polypectomy Recurrence Surveillance 

References

  1. 1.
    Zheng S, Cai S. Colorectal cancer epidemiology and prevention study in China. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol. 2003;2:72–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, Ho MN, Gottlieb L, Sternberg SS, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, Stillman JS, O’Brien MJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:143–59 (quiz 184–5).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, Smith RA, Bond JH, Brooks D, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1865–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martinez ME, Sampliner R, Marshall JR, Bhattacharyya AK, Reid ME, Alberts DS. Adenoma characteristics as risk factors for recurrence of advanced adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1077–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Corle D, Lance P, Iber F, Caan B, et al. Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1149–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baron JA, Cole BF, Sandler RS, Haile RW, Ahnen D, Bresalier R, et al. A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:891–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, Ahnen DJ, Provenzale D, Sontag SJ, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1077–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Burt R, Kikendall JW, Lance P, et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:385–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z, Rothwell DM, Vinden C, Rabeneck L. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:96–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leung K, Pinsky P, Laiyemo AO, Lanza E, Schatzkin A, Schoen RE. Ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy: the Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-up Study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;71:111–7.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, Coumaros D, Bauret P, Potier P, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. Colonoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of colorectal cancer. Gut. 2001;48:753–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B, Kudo S. Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. In: Hamilton SR, Altonen IA, editors. Tumours of the digestive system. WHO classification of tumors. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000. p. 113–4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sauerbrei W. The use of resampling methods to simplify regression models in medical statistics. Appl Stat. 1999;48:313–29.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsu CH, Long Q, Alberts DS. Estimation of colorectal adenoma recurrence with dependent censoring. BMC Med Res Method. 2009;9:66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leung WK, Lau JY, Suen BY, Wong GL, Chow DK, Lai LH, et al. Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk Chinese: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2028–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA, Beck GJ. Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:433–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nusko G, Mansmann U, Kirchner T, Hahn EG. Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy. Gut. 2002;51:424–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bertario L, Russo A, Sala P, Pizzetti P, Ballardini G, Andreola S, et al. Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:82–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Albert PS, Sansbury LB, Wang Z, Cross AJ, et al. Postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: predictive accuracy for advanced adenoma at 4 years. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:419–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loeve F, van Ballegooijen M, Boer R, Kuipers EJ, Habbema JD. Colorectal cancer risk in adenoma patients: a nation-wide study. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:147–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Winawer SJ, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, Church T, Yokochi LA, Doria-Rose VP, et al. The yield of surveillance colonoscopy by adenoma history and time to examination. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:86–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, Ritenbaugh C, Hubbell FA, Ascensao J, Rodabough RJ, et al. Estrogen plus progestin and colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:991–1004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zisman AL, Nickolov A, Brand RE, Gorchow A, Roy HK. Associations between the age at diagnosis and location of colorectal cancer and the use of alcohol and tobacco: implications for screening. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:629–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paskett ED, Reeves KW, Pineau B, Albert PS, Caan B, Hasson M, et al. The association between cigarette smoking and colorectal polyp recurrence (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:1021–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reid ME, Marshall JR, Roe D, Lebowitz M, Alberts D, Battacharyya AK, et al. Smoking exposure as a risk factor for prevalent and recurrent colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2003;12:1006–11.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fossi S, Bazzoli F, Ricciardiello L, Nicolini G, Zagari RM, Pozzato P, et al. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas in first-degree asymptomatic relatives of patients with colon cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1601–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wallace K, Baron JA, Karagas MR, Cole BF, Byers T, Beach MA, et al. The association of physical activity and body mass index with the risk of large bowel polyps. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14:2082–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yinglong Huang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wei Gong
    • 1
  • Bingzhong Su
    • 2
  • Fachao Zhi
    • 1
  • Side Liu
    • 1
  • Yang Bai
    • 1
  • Bo Jiang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated HospitalInner Mongolia Medical CollegeHuhhotPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations