Epidemiological study of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Japan
- 1.4k Downloads
There have been few epidemiological studies on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) in Japan.
We examined the epidemiology of GEP-NETs [pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs)] in Japan in 2005 using a nationwide stratified random sampling method.
A total of 2,845 individuals received treatment for PETs. Prevalence was estimated as 2.23/100,000 with an annual onset incidence of 1.01/100,000. Non-functioning tumor (NF)-PET constituted 47.4%, followed by insulinoma (38.2%) and gastrinoma (7.9%). Distant metastases were reported in 21% patients with NF-PETs and occurred more frequently as tumor size increased (>2 cm). Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) was detected in 10% of PETs but only in 6.1% of NF-PETs. NF-PETs were detected incidentally by physical examination in 24% patients. In 2005, an estimated 4,406 patients received treatment for GI-NETs. Prevalence was estimated as 3.45/100,000, with an annual onset incidence of 2.10/100,000. The locations of GI-NETs varied: foregut, 30.4%; midgut, 9.6%; and hindgut, 60.0%. Distant metastases were observed in 6%. Lymph node metastases occurred more frequently as tumor size increased (>1 cm). The frequency of MEN-1 complications was 1%. Physical examination revealed GI-NETs in 44% patients. The frequency of symptomatic GI-NETs was 3.4%. Interestingly, 77.1% of patients with foregut GI-NETs had type A gastritis.
Our results show there are large differences in GEP-NETs between Japan and Western nations, primarily due to differences in the presence of MEN-1 in NF-PETs and the location, symptomatic status, and prevalence of malignancy in GI-NETs.
KeywordsNeuroendocrine tumor Endocrine pancreatic tumor Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors Nationwide survey Epidemiology
The authors are most grateful to the doctors who responded to the questionnaires.
- 1.Berge T, Linell F. Carcinoid tumours. Frequency in a defined population during a 12-year period. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1976;84:322–30.Google Scholar
- 6.Plöckinger U, Rindi G, Arnold R, Eriksson B, Krenning EP, de Herder WW, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumours. A consensus statement on behalf of the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS). Neuroendocrinology. 2004;80:394–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Oberg K, Astrup L, Eriksson B, Falkmer SE, Falkmer UG, Gustafsen J, et al. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (including bronchopulmonary and thymic neoplasms). Part I: general overview. Acta Oncol. 2004;43:617–25.Google Scholar
- 8.Oberg K, Astrup L, Eriksson B, Falkmer SE, Falkmer UG, Gustafsen J, et al. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (including bronchopulmonary and thymic neoplasms). Part II: specific NE tumour types. Acta Oncol. 2004;43:626–36.Google Scholar
- 15.Ohno Y. The nationwide epidemiological survey manual for investigating the number of patients and clinico-epidemiological features of intractable diseases. Tokyo: Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare; 1998 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
- 16.Phan AT, Yao JC. Neuroendocrine tumors: novel approaches in the age of targeted therapy. Oncology (Williston Park). 2008;22:1617–23.Google Scholar