Regular surveillance by imaging for early detection and better prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients infected with hepatitis C virus
This study evaluated the usefulness of regular check-ups by ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced imaging for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a retrospective analysis.
Patients and methods
From April 2001 to March 2007, 240 consecutive patients with HCC who were infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) were divided into three groups. Patients diagnosed with HCC by repeated imaging constituted Group A (surveillance group). Group B comprised patients in whom HCC was detected during scheduled doctor visits for liver disease or other diseases such as diabetes. Group C comprised non-screened patients.
The prevalence of solitary tumors decreased from Group A through Group B to Group C (66, 48 and 24%, respectively, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients in stages I and II decreased from 83% (103/124) in Group A to 53% (42/79) in Group B and 24% (9/37) in Group C (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who were treated with curative procedures, such as resection or ablation, was highest at 80% (99/124) in Group A, and lower at 53% (42/79) in Group B and 27% (10/37) in Group C (P < 0.001). The cumulative survival rate was better in Group A than B (P < 0.05), and in Group B than C (P < 0.001). Periodical medical check-ups without imaging did not necessarily detect early-stage disease, even when HCC-related markers including des-γ-carboxy prothrombin were tested.
Regular surveillance with ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced imaging is useful for detecting early-stage HCC and increase chances for curative treatments in patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease.
KeywordsHepatocellular carcinoma Early detection Curative procedures Survival rates Surveillance
- 9.Mok TS, Yeo W, Yu S, Lai P, Chan HL, Chan AT, et al. An intensive surveillance program detected a high incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma among hepatitis B virus carriers with abnormal alpha-fetoprotein levels or abdominal ultrasonography results. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8041–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. General rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer. 2nd English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2003.Google Scholar
- 22.Kamada K, Kitamoto M, Aikata H, Kawakami Y, Kono H, Imamura M, et al. Combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using cisplatin-lipiodol suspension and percutaneous ethanol injection for treatment of advanced small hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2002;184:284–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kamada K, Nakanishi T, Kitamoto M, Aikata H, Kawakami Y, Ito K, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of cisplatin lipiodol suspension and doxorubicin hydrochloride emulsion. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:847–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Group formed to establish “Guidelines for evidence-based clinical practice for the treatment of liver cancer”. Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma (in Japanese). Tokyo: Kanehara & Co., Ltd.; 2005.Google Scholar
- 27.Takayasu K. Hepatic angiography. In: Okuda K, Tabor E, editors. Liver cancer. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. p. 347–59.Google Scholar
- 37.Saneto H, Kobayashi M, Kawamura Y, Yatsuji H, Sezaki H, Hosaka T, et al. Clinicopathological features, background liver disease, and survival analysis of HCV-positive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: differences between young and elderly patients. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:975–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar