Differential diagnosis of nodular lesions in cirrhotic liver by post-vascular phase contrast-enhanced US with Levovist: comparison with superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance images
- 73 Downloads
We investigated the diagnostic utility of post-vascular phase contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US) and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as compared to the histological diagnosis of differential grades of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).
Forty-nine patients with histologically characterized liver nodules (well-differentiated HCC, n = 20; moderately differentiated HCC, n = 19; poorly differentiated HCC, n = 1; dysplastic nodule, n = 9) received contrast-enhanced US and SPIO-MRI. Subsequently, we quantitatively evaluated the relationships between the images of the nodules and their histological diagnosis and differential grades.
The ratio of the echogenicity of the tumorous area to that of the nontumorous area with post-vascular phase contrast-enhanced US (post-vascular phase ratio) decreased as nodules became less differentiated (P < 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test). The ratio of the intensity of the nontumorous area to that of the tumorous area on SPIO-enhanced MR images (SPIO intensity index) also decreased as nodules became less differentiated (P < 0.01). The post-vascular phase ratio correlated with the SPIO intensity index for HCCs and dysplastic nodules (r = 0.76). The conformity of the result from the post-vascular phase contrast-enhanced US and SPIO-MRI was 96%.
Contrast-enhanced US is a valuable method for predicting the histological grade of HCCs in cirrhotic patients, and may be a good alternative to SPIO-enhanced MRI.
Key wordscontrast-enhanced ultrasonography post-vascular phase SPIO-MRI hepatocellular carcinoma dysplastic nodule
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Blomley, MJ, Albrecht, T, Cosgrove, DO, Eckersley, RJ, Butler-Barnes, J, Jayaram, V, et al. 1999The use of stimulated acoustic emission to image a late liver-specific phase of Levovist: an investigation in normal volunteers and patients with and without liver diseaseUltrasound Med Biol25134152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Mueller, PR, Saini, S, Wittenburg, J, Simeone, J, Hahn, PF, Steiner, E, et al. 1987Feriite particles: a superparamagnetic MR contrast agent for enhanced detection of liver carcinomaRadiology16221722Google Scholar
- 5.Asahina, Y, Izumi, N, Uchihara, M, Noguchi, O, Ueda, K, Inoue, K, et al. 2003Assessment of Kupffer cells by ferrumoxides-enhanced MR imaging is benefical for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of pathological diagnosis and perfusion patterns assessed by CT hepatic arteriography and CT arterioportographyHepatol Res27196204PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.International Working Party1995Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesionsHepatology2298393Google Scholar
- 9.Walday, P, Tolleshaug, H, Gjoen, T, Kindberg, GM, Berg, T, Skotland, T, et al. 1994Biodistributions of air-filled albumin microspheres in rats and pigsBiochem J1543743Google Scholar
- 19.Hayashi, M, Masui, O, Ueda, K 1999Correlation between the blood supply and grade of malignancy of hepatocellular nodules associated with liver cirrhosis: evaluation by CT during intraarterial injection of contrast mediumAJR Am J Roentogenol17296976Google Scholar
- 21.Kudo, M 2003Contrast harmonic imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic tumorsSpringer-VerlagNew York Heidelbery Berlin TokyoGoogle Scholar