Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 396–402

Novel virtual hepatectomy is useful for evaluation of the portal territory for anatomical sectionectomy, segmentectomy, and hemihepatectomy

  • Shun-ichi Ariizumi
  • Yutaka Takahashi
  • Yoshihito Kotera
  • Akiko Omori
  • Godai Yoneda
  • Han Mu
  • Satoshi Katagiri
  • Hiroto Egawa
  • Masakazu Yamamoto
Original article



The novel technique of virtual hepatectomy is useful for evaluation of the portal territory of the liver, since this software program includes functions for liver surgery planning. We evaluated the accuracy of virtual hepatectomy for anatomical hepatectomy.


Between 2010 and 2011, 92 patients with liver tumors underwent virtual hepatectomy preoperatively. The predicted liver volume was compared with the actual liver volume among patients who underwent anatomical sectionectomy, segmentectomy, and hemihepatectomy.


Ninety of 92 patients underwent anatomical hepatectomy on the basis of virtual hepatectomy. According to the surgical procedure, the predicted liver resection volume showed a strong correlation with the actual liver volume in patients who underwent sectionectomy (r = 0.985, p < 0.0001, n = 44, median error rate 9 %), segmentectomy (r = 0.949, p < 0.0001, n = 17, median error rate 12 %), and hemihepatectomy (r = 0.967, p < 0.0001, n = 29, median error rate 7 %).


The novel technique of virtual hepatectomy is useful for evaluation of the portal territory for anatomical sectionectomy, segmentectomy, and hemihepatectomy.


Virtual hepatectomy Simulation Anatomical hepatectomy 


  1. 1.
    Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Otsubo T, Katsuragawa H, Fukuda C, Katagiri S. Effectiveness of systematized hepatectomy with Glisson’s pedicle transection at hepatic hilus for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis. Surgery. 2001;130:443–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, Aoki T, Minagawa M, et al. Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;242:252–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eguchi S, Kanematsu T, Arii S, Okazaki M, Okita K, Omata M, et al. Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey. Surgery. 2008;143:469–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S, Saito A, Yamamoto M, Hanyu F. Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath cord transection at the hepatic hilus. Int Surg. 1990;75:73–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takasaki K. Glissonean pedicle transection method for hepatic resection: a new concept of liver segmentation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5:286–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S. Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985;161:346–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lamadé W, Glombitza G, Fischer L, Chiu P, Cárdenas CE Sr, Thorn M, et al. The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Arch Surg. 2000;135:1256–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rau HG, Schauer R, Helmberger T, Holzknecht N, von Rückmann B, Meyer L, et al. Impact of virtual reality imaging on hepatic liver tumor resection: calculation of risk. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2000;385:162–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wigmore SJ, Redhead DN, Yan XJ, Casey J, Madhavan K, Dejong CH, et al. Virtual hepatic resection using three-dimensional reconstruction of helical computed tomography angioportograms. Ann Surg. 2000;233:221–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saito S, Yamanaka J, Miura K, Nakao N, Nagao T, Sugimoto T, et al. A novel 3D hepatectomy simulation based on liver circulation: application to liver resection and transplantation. Hepatology. 2005;41:1297–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, Schroeder T, Frühauf NR, Malagó M, et al. Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Arch Surg. 2005;140:629–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamanaka J, Saito S, Iimuro Y, Hirano T, Okada T, Kuroda N, et al. The impact of 3-D virtual hepatectomy simulation in living-donor liver transplantation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13:363–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Terminology Committee of the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association: Modified from the Brisbane 2000 Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB. 2000;2:333–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karlo C, Reiner CS, Stolzmann P, Breitenstein S, Marincek B, Weishaupt D, et al. CT- and MRI-based volumetry of resected liver specimen: comparison to intraoperative volume and weight measurements and calculation of conversion factors. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75:107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van der Vorst JR, van Dam RM, van Stiphout RS, van den Broek MA, Hollander IH, Kessels AG, et al. Virtual liver resection and volumetric analysis of the future liver remnant using open source image processing software. World J Surg. 2010;34:2426–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dello SA, Stoot JH, van Stiphout RS, Bloemen JG, Wigmore SJ, Dejong CH, et al. Prospective volumetric assessment of the liver on a personal computer by nonradiologists prior to partial hepatectomy. World J Surg. 2011;35:386–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okamoto E, Kyo A, Yamanaka N, Tanaka N, Kuwata K. Prediction of the safe limits of hepatectomy by combined volumetric and functional measurements in patients with impaired hepatic function. Surgery. 1984;95:586–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Suzuki S, Muto H, Marada M, Yamana Y, et al. Predetermining postoperative hepatic function for hepatectomies. Int Surg. 1980;65:309–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ariizumi S, Yamamoto M, Takasaki K. Right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with an indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes of 10 % or higher. Dig Surg. 2009;26:135–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schindl MJ, Redhead DN, Fearon KC, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ, Edinburgh Liver Surgery and Transplantation Experimental Research Group (eLISTER). The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. Gut. 2005;54:289–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Matsunami H, Hashikura Y, Ikegami T, Chisuwa H, et al. Preoperative measurement of segmental liver volume of donors for living related liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1993;18:1115–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sakamoto S, Uemoto S, Uryuhara K, Kim ID, Kiuchi T, Egawa H, et al. Graft size assessment and analysis of donors for living donor liver transplantation using right lobe. Transplantation. 2001;71:1407–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamanaka J, Saito S, Fujimoto J. Impact of preoperative planning using virtual segmental volumetry on liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg. 2007;31:1249–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Makuuchi M, Hashikura Y, Kawasaki S, Tan D, Kosuge T, Takayama T. Personal experience of right anterior segmentectomy (segments V and VIII) for hepatic malignancies. Surgery. 1993;114:52–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ariizumi S, Katagiri S, Katsuragawa H, Kotera Y, Yamamoto M. Sectionectomy is suitable for patients with T2 hepatocellular carcinoma according to the modified international union against cancer TNM classification. Dig Surg. 2007;24:342–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yamamoto M, Ariizumi S, Katagiri S, Kotera Y, Takahashi Y. The value of anatomical liver sectionectomy for patients with a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma from 2 to 5 cm in greatest diameter. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:585–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yamamoto M, Katagiri S, Ariizumi S, Kotera Y, Takahashi Y. Glissonean pedicle transection method for liver surgery (with video). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:3–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Springer Japan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shun-ichi Ariizumi
    • 1
  • Yutaka Takahashi
    • 1
  • Yoshihito Kotera
    • 1
  • Akiko Omori
    • 1
  • Godai Yoneda
    • 1
  • Han Mu
    • 1
  • Satoshi Katagiri
    • 1
  • Hiroto Egawa
    • 1
  • Masakazu Yamamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Institute of GastroenterologyTokyo Women’s Medical UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations